The National Review: A Follow-Up Appointment

Partner content from The National Review

President Barack Obama i

President Barack Obama looks towards reporters as he walks from the White House to the Blair House in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 25, 2010, as he continued the health care summit with Republican and Democratic lawmakers. Charles Dharapak/AP Photo hide caption

itoggle caption Charles Dharapak/AP Photo
President Barack Obama

President Barack Obama looks towards reporters as he walks from the White House to the Blair House in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 25, 2010, as he continued the health care summit with Republican and Democratic lawmakers.

Charles Dharapak/AP Photo

Several things were accomplished at the summit. The Democrats failed to make their case — which, in itself, was an accomplishment of sorts for the country. President Obama's mystique was further reduced, as the event made him appear more like the first among equals than like the undisputed leader of a coordinate branch. And Republicans, given a much better forum than usual, gave voice to what the American people so oppose about the Democrats' proposed health-care overhaul.

Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.), who was excellent, forcefully laid out how Obamacare would raise health-care costs and budget deficits. Many other members — including Sen. Lamar Alexander (R., Tenn.) and Sen. Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) — made key points and helped set the respectful, but not overly deferential, tone of the exchange. Republicans should ride their momentum from this event, keep making a strong case against government-run health care, and keep advancing proposals for real reform.

The primary impression, however, that I take away from the summit is this: I can't imagine that most of those who were watching on television would want the 30 or so people in that room to design a health-care system for the entire country. The 60 or so people who met in Independence Hall in 1787 didn't think they needed to design such systems. Rather, they created a government to secure the liberty of the American people to design such systems themselves, piece by piece, person by person, company by company, through the countless free choices of a free citizenry.

The fundamental difference between the two sides is that one wants to have a small group of people in Washington design and control the society in which we will live, and the other one doesn't. As Sen. Jon Kyl said, "We cannot paper over" that difference.

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.