Conservative Media Stokes New Black Panther Story

Malik Zulu Shabazz i i

Malik Zulu Shabazz is chairman of the New Black Panther Party, which has been designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center and Anti-Defamation League. Manny Ceneta/Getty Images hide caption

itoggle caption Manny Ceneta/Getty Images
Malik Zulu Shabazz

Malik Zulu Shabazz is chairman of the New Black Panther Party, which has been designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center and Anti-Defamation League.

Manny Ceneta/Getty Images

This story starts, as so many do these days, with videotape. In this case, it was taken by a couple of conservatives from the University of Pennsylvania.

They captured an exchange on Election Day in November 2008 with a few members of the New Black Panther Party, who were swaggering outside a polling station in a heavily black part of Philadelphia.

Much of the conversation had to do with the nightstick being brandished by one of the New Black Panthers. The video, which prompted coverage from the Fox News Channel and others that very day, would ultimately lead to criminal charges, allegations of reverse discrimination and a media storm that's continued to today.

In late 2008 — during the waning weeks of the Bush administration — the Justice Department filed voter intimidation charges against the New Black Panther Party and several of its members, but charges against the group itself were dropped in May 2009. Justice officials argued there was no compelling evidence that the party itself was involved. In the end, only one person was actually sanctioned, and a brief flap ensued.

Then, late last month, former Justice Department civil rights attorney and Bush political appointee J. Christian Adams rekindled the story by suggesting that under President Obama, the department is now unwilling to prosecute blacks for civil rights violations.

"As I have said under oath, this is the easiest case," Adams told NPR's Michel Martin. "I mean, there's plenty of evidence that this was a violation of federal law. And don't forget — this is also important — federal law bans the attempt to intimidate."

The New Black Panthers can be an intimidating bunch. They are a "distinctly anti-white, anti-gay, anti-Jewish organization," says Mark Potok, director of the Intelligence Project for the Southern Poverty Law Center, a liberal civil rights outfit that monitors hate groups. "As a matter of fact, some of its leaders have said things like, 'We ought to kill all white people, then bury them in the ground, and then dig them up and kill them again.'"

Potok's organization has been listing the New Black Panthers as a hate group for about a decade. He says that despite the group's small size and lack of a violent record, he finds the Election Day incident troubling. According to Potok, the federal investigation and even the charges ultimately levied were warranted.

And while Potok believes the November 2008 incident to be relatively minor, it's actually inspired a tremendous amount of coverage — especially from the Fox News Channel.

According to the liberal watchdog group Media Matters, Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly had 45 segments totaling more than 3 1/2 hours from June 30 through July 14 on the subject of the New Black Panthers and Adams' allegations.

Kelly also assailed others for failing to cover the story, including CBS chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer. On Sunday, CNN's Howard Kurtz asked Schieffer about his failure to ask Attorney General Eric Holder about Adams' allegations when Holder appeared on Schieffer's Face the Nation.

"I was on vacation the week this happened; apparently it got very little publicity," Schieffer said. "I just didn't know about it. You know, God knows everything, but I'm not quite that good."

Others seemed to suggest that some mainstream news outlets needed to catch up, including the Washington Post's ombudsman and one of its senior editors.

Conservatives argue the episode fits a pattern of protecting the Obama administration from embarrassing stories, such as the ACORN tapes or the incendiary beliefs of the president's former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

"These stories kept building, building, building in this undermedia," argues Andrew Breitbart, who runs a network of conservative blogs. "You can call it Fox News; you can call it Breitbart sites; you can call it the Drudge Report; you can call it whatever you like — but this undermedia builds up stories."

Still some conservatives, including Linda Chavez, the former staff director of the Commission on Civil Rights under former President Ronald Reagan; and Abigail Thernstrom, that commission's current Republican vice chairwoman, say the New Black Panther story is overblown.

Potok, who's been monitoring the New Black Panthers ever since they made it onto his list of hate groups, agrees.

"Frankly, I think that what has been raised by the conservative and right-wing press, and the tone that it's been raised in, has amounted to a tempest in a teacup," Potok says. "I just see a lot of screaming hypocrisy on the part of outfits like Fox News and some of the other conservative news outlets."



Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.