From Our Listeners

Letters: The Firing Of Shirley Sherrod

  • Playlist
  • Download
  • Embed
    <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

Robert Siegel and Michele Norris read from listeners' e-mails about our coverage of the fallout from the firing of former USDA official Shirley Sherrod.


Our coverage yesterday of the fallout from Shirley Sherrod's firing sent many of you to your keyboard.


Sherrod is the former USDA official who was forced out of her job after a conservative blogger posted a video clip of her recalling her reluctance, 24 years ago, to help a white farmer.

But the clip was part of a longer speech about how she recognized and overcame her feelings and ultimately helped the farmer, who has since come to her defense. The White House apologized to Sherrod yesterday.

NORRIS: Here's some of what you had to say about our coverage of the story. Frank Holk(ph) of Wytheville, Virginia, writes this: I found it distressing that you spent the entire time talking about the actions of the administration with barely a mention of Andrew Breitbart and Fox News.

Holk continues: Wouldn't it have been more appropriate to discuss their role in the matter? How about a discussion of Fox's sleazy reporting and Breitbart's fraudulent video editing.

SIEGEL: I could not be more furious. That's from Michael Walker(ph) of Mountain Grove, Missouri. He felt our reporting came up short, taking specific issue with our statement that conservative activists have blurred the lines between journalism and advocacy.

Mr. Walker says: Andrew Breitbart has done no such thing. He has eradicated the line between fact and fiction, or if you will, between the truth and a lie. If NPR cannot call the actions of this prevaricating charlatan a falsehood, then who will?

NORRIS: But Phil Corsello(ph) of Denver, Colorado, believes Sherrod's firing revealed, in his words, an insecure administration. He writes: It was major for what it revealed, the White House's willingness to sacrifice one of their people before the facts were known in an attempt to quell the Republican propaganda machine.

The action was, from the get-go, amateurish, unsavory and disloyal, not a declaration but a whimper.

SIEGEL: Send us your thoughts on anything you hear on our program at Just click on contact us at the bottom of the page.

Copyright © 2010 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.



Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

NPR thanks our sponsors

Become an NPR sponsor

Support comes from