Steve Cohen Fights Back Against Claims Of Insider Trading

  • Playlist
  • Download
  • Embed
    <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

Last week the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused SAC founder, Steven Cohen of negligence. The complaint alleges Cohen failed to supervise employees the SEC believes were engaged in insider trading. On Tuesday, Cohen and SAC fired back.


From NPR News, this is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I'm Melissa Block. Billionaire Steven Cohen is fighting back. He faces federal charges that he didn't do enough to prevent insider trading at his hedge fund SAC Capital.

As The Wall Street Journal reported this morning, Cohen's firm issued a rebuttal, claiming that he never saw an email that's an important part of the government's case. Here's NPR's Jim Zarroli.

JIM ZARROLI, BYLINE: On Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission finally brought charges against 57-year-old Steven Cohen. He wasn't accused of insider trading, but the government did file civil charges against him. It said Cohen allowed insider trading to happen at his firm by failing to adequately supervise his employees. And perhaps most alarmingly for Cohen, the government wants to get him barred for life from handling other people's money.

Today, The Wall Street Journal said Cohen's lawyers have compiled a point-by-point rebuttal of the government's case. Jacob Frenkel is a securities lawyer who has been following the case.

JACOB FRENKEL: It's a communication directed at the employees of SAC, to give them comfort that Steve Cohen intends to fight the allegations and why they are baseless.

ZARROLI: According to the Journal, the paper addresses an email about Dell computers that was sent to Cohen by one of his employees in August 2008. The government says Cohen should have known, based on the contents of the email, that it contained illegally obtained information. In the white paper to employees, Cohen's lawyers said he receives a thousand emails and instant messages a day, and there's no evidence he ever read the one in question. Columbia Law School professor John Coffee is skeptical about Cohen's argument.

JOHN COFFEE: He's famous for wanting all the information he can get about an issuer. So it doesn't seem totally credible that he would ignore late-breaking emails from the people who were, at the point, collecting all the available information.

ZARROLI: The white paper also addresses another transaction highlighted by the government. The SEC says Cohen's firm traded shares of two drug companies based on inside information about the results of a drug trial. But Cohen's lawyers say the shares were traded because they had risen so much in value over the preceding months, and it was time for a little profit-taking.

The white paper is likely to form a kind of rough outline of what Cohen's defense will be, once the case is heard by a judge.

Jim Zarroli, NPR News, New York.

Copyright © 2013 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.



Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

NPR thanks our sponsors

Become an NPR sponsor

Support comes from