NPR logo

Why Wasn't New Orleans Better Prepared?

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Why Wasn't New Orleans Better Prepared?

Katrina & Beyond

Why Wasn't New Orleans Better Prepared?

Why Wasn't New Orleans Better Prepared?

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
A man walks alone in New Orleans' floodwaters i

A New Orleans resident walks through floodwaters in the downtown area, Sept. 1, 2005. Reuters hide caption

toggle caption Reuters
A man walks alone in New Orleans' floodwaters

A New Orleans resident walks through floodwaters in the downtown area, Sept. 1, 2005.


Emergency managers in New Orleans had been debating whether the levee system would work in a major hurricane before Katrina hit. Federal funding cuts left many projects undone and local engineers were not surprised when water surged into New Orleans.


This is MORNING EDITION from NPR News. I'm Renee Montagne.

For years, a lot of people in New Orleans were sounding the alarm. The city's levee and flood control system, they said, was not adequate. Complaints about cuts in federal funding got widespread coverage in the local media and even representatives of the US Army Corps of Engineers worried about projects left undone. Still, there's disagreement over whether more money would have had an impact on the current disaster. NPR's Pam Fessler reports.

PAM FESSLER reporting:

Joe Suhayda spent years working with emergency managers in the New Orleans area talking about levee systems and what would and wouldn't work in a major hurricane. The former engineering professor at Louisiana State University says officials conducted multiple disaster exercises, including one held last summer.

Former Professor JOE SUHAYDA (Louisiana State University): Exactly this scenario was played out. There were simulations made. I got the document in front of me because it's one of those things that's just eerie because of the prescience of it, you know, the foresight.

FESSLER: The exercise involved a fictitious storm called Hurricane Pam. Suhayda reads the scenario setup.

Mr. SUHAYDA: A hurricane packing winds of a hundred and twenty miles per hour and a storm surge that tops 17-foot levees slams into New Orleans, killing an untold number of persons, trapping half of the area's residents in attics, on rooftops and in makeshift refuges. Parts of the city are flooded with up to 20 feet of water and 80 percent of the buildings in the area are severely damaged.

FESSLER: And so he says what happens this week should have come as no surprise. There had long been concerns among emergency managers that the city's levee system was only designed to withstand a Category 3 hurricane, not the stronger one that hit this week. And there were complaints that even this lower level of protection was inadequately funded. Al Naomi, a senior project manager with the Corps of Engineers in New Orleans, said in a magazine article in June that a pending a $71 million budget cut would delay some crucial levee projects. But Naomi told NPR that those projects were unrelated to the flood walls breached in this week's storm and that the funding would not have made a difference.

Mr. AL NAOMI (Corps of Engineers, New Orleans): As far as the Corps was concerned, those flood walls were completed and did not have to be readdressed. The Corps was satisfied that those flood walls were designed properly and were at the proper elevation prior to this event that would have survived the designed storm.

FESSLER: Unfortunately, the designed storm was not as strong as the real one. Naomi says he's been pushing for years for a stronger system to withstand a Category 5 storm, but he's had little luck. Richard Wagenaar, commander of the New Orleans Corps of Engineers District, says there's a difficult trade-off he doesn't like but understands.

Mr. RICHARD WAGENAAR (Commander, New Orleans Corps of Engineers District): Do you spend billions and billions and billions of dollars for an event that has never occurred in the history of the United States? Or don't you? How do you prioritize that with all the other national priorities in the last 15 or 20 years? I mean, that's the balancing that past administrations, current administrations and all the congresses have made.

FESSLER: One person who's well aware of those trade-offs is Mike Parker, a former congressman for Mississippi. Parker was named by President Bush to head the Corps of Engineers in 2001, but he was forced to resign shortly after because of disputes he had with the White House over the size of his agency's budget. He thinks adequate funding would have limited this week's flooding, but he says it can't be blamed on the current administration.

Former Congressman MIKE PARKER (Mississippi): We're talking about decisions that were made in the 1960s, '70s and '80s. We're talking a long time ago.

FESSLER: That's because levee projects are years in the making. Parker says both Republican and Democratic administrations have shortchanged the Corps, often dismissing these projects as pork barrel spending.

Mr. PARKER: I promise you, you can go down to New Orleans right now, look in the face of any person that is there and ask them, `Are infrastructure levees that protect the city of New Orleans from flooding, is that pork?' And they will look at you in all sincerity and say, `No, it is not pork.'

FESSLER: Parker hopes some lessons will be learned from the current tragedy. Yesterday, White House spokesman Scott McClellan dismissed criticism that the administration hadn't provided enough funding for New Orleans' levee systems. He said the middle of a crisis is not the time to point fingers. Pam Fessler, NPR News, Washington.

Copyright © 2005 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.



Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.