Other Nations Wary of Tough Talk on Iran

President Bush meets his National Security team i i

President Bush meets with his National Security team in the White House Situation Room March 10, 2006. Reuters/Reuters hide caption

itoggle caption Reuters/Reuters
President Bush meets his National Security team

President Bush meets with his National Security team in the White House Situation Room March 10, 2006.

Reuters/Reuters

The rhetoric has been escalating in Washington as the U.N. Security Council considers how to push Iran to abandon a suspected nuclear weapons program. The United States wants to isolate Iran and its leaders, but other nations are far more cautious, given the Bush administration's record in Iraq.

Copyright © 2006 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

MELISSA BLOCK, host:

President Bush today described Iran as an issue of grave national security concern. The rhetoric in Washington has been escalating as the U.N. Security Council considers how to push Iran to abandon suspected nuclear weapons programs.

The U.S. has laid out a diplomatic strategy to isolate Iran and its leaders, possibly with targeted sanctions. Russia and other countries are far more cautious, given the Bush Administration's record on Iraq.

NPR's Michele Kelemen reports.

MICHELE KELEMEN reporting:

For Sergei Lavrov, the discussions on Iran sound all too familiar. He was the Russian ambassador to the United Nations in the run up to the war on Iraq. Now, as Russia's Foreign Minister, he's being asked whether his country would back U.N. resolutions that could punish Iran for an alleged weapons program.

Mr. SERGEI LAVROV (Russian Foreign Affairs Minister): Well it looks so déjà vu, that, you know, I've been answering these questions regarding Iraq, and I don't believe that we should engage in something which might become self-fulfilling prophecy. We are convinced that there is no military solution to this crisis.

KELEMEN: Bush administration officials will not take the military option off the table, but they insist they are committed to the diplomatic path regarding Iran. The plan is to start slowly, with a Security Council statement that diplomats hope to approve next week, urging Iran to comply with the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., John Bolton, is leading the effort.

Mr. JOHN BOLTON (United States Ambassador to the United Nations): The first question to ask is, do you care if Iran adheres to the resolutions of the International Atomic Energy Agency? And if you care, as we do, then you can understand why we're here at the Security Council pursuing multilateral diplomacy in an effort to thwart this threat to international peace and security by peaceful and diplomatic means. So if that's déjà vu, then so be it.

KELEMEN: Bolton sees Iran as a test case for the Security Council, and administration officials have been talking tough all week. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, for instance, accused Iran of being a central banker of terrorism and said the U.S. may face no greater challenge from a single country than from Iran.

Ms. CONDOLEEZZA RICE (Secretary of State): If you can take that and multiply it by several hundred, you can imagine an Iran with a nuclear weapon and the threat that they would then pose to that region.

KELEMEN: Listening to such rhetoric gives Joseph Cirincione pause. He's a nonproliferation expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and says the language is eerily similar to the talk about Iraq before the war.

Mr. JOSEPH CIRINCIONE (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace): She calls Iran our greatest challenge. This at a time when U.S. soldiers are dying every day in Iraq and we're spending over a billion dollars a week, and the country's on the verge of civil war. But Iran is our biggest challenge? We have North Korea that actually has material for nuclear weapons, but she's calling Iran our greatest challenge.

KELEMEN: Cirincione accuses the Bush administration of exaggerating the threat.

Mr. CIRINCIONE: We have to stop Iran from getting this technology. But we have years to do this. And all this talk about point of no return, or moments in the next few months where Iran will have the capability, this is nonsense. Iran is a good five to ten years away from building a bomb. Who says so? Our own national intelligence estimate.

KELEMEN: Cirincione says getting a U.N. Security Council statement next week will be the easy part. But the tough talk in Washington could make U.N. diplomats nervous for the next stage of diplomacy, a Security Council resolution that could open the door to punitive measures.

Michele Kelemen, NPR News, in Washington.

Copyright © 2006 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.