The Gates Foundation is the nation's largest charitable foundation. It focuses its work on public health issues in developing countries. It has long been clear that Bill Gates wanted to have the same kind of impact in philanthropy that he has had in software.
This is MORNING EDITION, from NPR News. I'm Susan Stamberg.
STEVE INSKEEP, host:
And I'm Steve Inskeep.
Mr. WARREN BUFFETT (Chairman, Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.): I do not believe in inheriting your position in society based on what womb you come from. It isn't in keeping with my view of how the world should operate to create huge amounts of dynastic wealth.
INSKEEP: With those words, Warren Buffett formally signed away most of the fortune that he has amassed during decades of investing. Much has been made of the $30 billion gift to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Now consider this, that $30 billion will amount to only half of the assets that foundation has at its command. NPR's Wendy Kaufman reports on one billionaire's faith in another.
WENDY KAUFMAN reporting:
With his gift, Warren Buffett says a lot about himself and his trust and respect for the Gates Foundation. Buffett has described Bill Gates as the smartest man he ever met, and Buffett believes the foundation will do a much better job of investing his fortune to solve world problems than he could do.
Stacy Palmer, the long-time editor of The Chronicle of Philanthropy, says Buffett looked for efficiency and effectiveness.
Ms. STACY PALMER (Editor-in-chief, The Chronicle of Philanthropy): He very much looked at it in dollars and cents terms, and thinks that they are getting a lot of bang for their buck, and he is very impressed with the amount of results that they're getting for their dollars. And what he's hopeful is that when he combines his resources with theirs that there'll be a lot of ways that they can become even more efficient and even more powerful.
KAUFMAN: Buffett's gift will essentially double the foundation's giving to about $3 billion a year.
From its founding in the year 2000, the Gates Foundation has taken a results-oriented approach to big problems, chief among them, improving global health, and improving education in the U.S. The House initiatives have won the most praise; they focused on research, prevention and treatment for AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and vaccine-preventable childhood diseases.
Helene Gayle recently left her post as head of several health initiatives at the foundation to become the CEO of CARE. Gail says the foundation's focus on measurable results forced everyone to think harder and more carefully about the outcomes of what they were doing.
Dr. HELEN GAYLE (President and CEO, CARE): Did we change behaviors that will lead to a reduction in HIV transmission? Were we able to get people on treatment who didn't have access to treatment before? Are death rates declining in Botswana as a result of more and more people having access to treatment? So, always measuring.
KAUFMAN: The Director of Boston College's Center on Wealth and Philanthropy, Paul Schervish, adds that the Gates Foundation is not simply giving money to other charities; rather, it's creating its own philanthropic enterprises.
Dr. PAUL SCHERVISH (Director, Center on Wealth and Philanthropy, Boston College): You have this entrepreneurial philosophy where the donor not only contributes money, but actually effects the rate of return by personal involvement, the use of the donor's own personal skills and intellectual capital.
KAUFMAN: The foundation's health programs are both short-term, for example, getting children vaccinated, and long-term, things such as inventing new vaccines or creating more effective or less-expensive technologies for healthcare of its delivery. Staffers say Bill and Melinda Gates urge them to think outside the box and not be bound by conventional wisdom or limitations. Trevor Nielsen(ph) is another former foundation staffer.
Mr. TREVOR NIELSEN (Former member, Gates Foundation): It's kind of audacious, if you think about it, that we might actually end AIDS, that we might end malaria. If I think about what Bill brings to the table that is unique, it's that he is audacious. He believes these things actually can be solved.
KAUFMAN: And, says Nielsen, Bill Gates, like any good venture capitalist, is looking for leverage.
Mr. NIELSEN: You only need to look at vaccines and immunizations to understand their notion of leverage. Bill and Melinda looked around and saw that three million children a year die from vaccine-preventable diseases. They saw that with a big infusion of cash, those lives could be saved. And so they made the infusion of cash. They're picking things where, with big infusion of resources, a global change can be found.
KAUFMAN: Bill Gates recently wrote in an e-mail that vaccinations are a lot like software, the upfront costs are very high, but once you have a drug it can benefit everyone because of the low cost to manufacture.
The World Health Organizations says the foundation's work has already saved the lives of 670,000 children through vaccinations, and will save millions more in the coming years. The infusion of $30 billion additional dollars will likely mean many more lives will be saved or improved. What's more, the experts say, the success of the Gates Foundation has spurred other would-be philanthropists to step up and focus their money and know-how to make the world a better place.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.
Microsoft co-founder and chairman Bill Gates, left, answers questions during a news conference in New York with wife Melinda Gates and investment guru Warren Buffett, regarding Buffett's pledge of $31 billion to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Nicholas Roberts/AFP/Getty Images
Nicholas Roberts/AFP/Getty Images
When a Public Health Giant Doubles in Size
The sheer size of the new Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grants will no doubt influence how governments and other foundations choose to spend their public-health dollars, says Gerald Keusch, associate dean for global health at Boston University's School of Public Health.
Here, Keusch talks about how Buffett's gift to Gates may affect other public-health players:
Q: Can it be a bad thing to have so much money concentrated in one foundation?
When you're the 800-pound gorilla, you have a lot of power and impact and potential. It also creates some ambivalence on the part of the other players.
Q: What sorts of problems can crop up?
I worry about the effect that Gates' money has on the investment of others. Say you are the government of Uganda, and you've decided you're going to invest a certain amount of dollars in improving birth outcomes. And now Gates says, we're going to put X million dollars into your country and suddenly the country's own monetary commitment disappears. Then five or 10 years down the road, Gates says, "That's enough," and pulls out. There's no continuity of support. I hope the foundation will now look more at long-term sustainability.
Where would you like to see Gates put this new influx of money?
One hope would be that with this huge amount of additional money, they not only sustain the current kinds of investments but can now pick up on the infrastructure, training and the capacity of developing countries to deliver health care. Those are areas where Gates has not made any significant investment.
Should Warren Buffett have created a new foundation?
No, I think Buffett's philosophy is right on target. It's not a good idea to set up another foundation. The Gates Foundation has made a huge positive contribution, and Buffett's gift is a recognition of the priority they've made of global health in comparison to the other foundations, which have many priority areas.
They have a great opportunity now to get involved in an instructive, creative and complementary manner with their counterparts — other foundations, the governments of developing countries, as well as governments with serious funds for health programs, such as United States and Britain.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was already one of the top players on the global public-health scene; its annual donations — $1.36 billion in 2005 — dwarf those of other private charitable organizations. Now, with its spending set to double thanks to a gift from Warren Buffett, the foundation wields a fortune that holds the potential for even wider-scale change.
The foundation has invested in many areas of public health, from providing childhood immunizations to agricultural research in developing countries. One of the foundation's major priorities is HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment, with more than $350 million given in grants.
Thomas Quinn, who is director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health and has followed the foundation's AIDS work, spoke with NPR about Gates' role in the global effort to stop the disease. The foundation's attractions are not only its deep coffers, says Quinn, but its innovative and adventurous approach to research:
Q: How do the Gates Foundation programs differ from United Nations and World Health Organization global health programs?
The Gates Foundation right now is the largest philanthropic organization supporting global health research. For example, UNAIDS carries out surveillance of programs and makes global recommendations in prevention and treatment, but it doesn't fund major initiatives, like those involving research activities.
So right now, for instance, the Gates Foundation is supporting vaccine research for HIV and childhood diseases. WHO and UNAIDS are awaiting the results of those vaccine trials, and if they show protection, WHO or UNAIDS would then make recommendations to countries to implement these types of interventions. And the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, provides funding for treatment and care — it doesn't fund research.
All of these groups actually work well together, because they target different areas.
As a private group, does the Gates Foundation have more freedom in choosing the types of research it wants to fund?
Yes, the Gates Foundation is trying to fill in the gaps. They're really a transition between the National Institutes of Health and, ultimately, the Global Fund for AIDS, TB and Malaria. The foundation can fund really innovative, thought-provoking studies that perhaps a peer-review group like the NIH might avoid because they're high risk.
We have a trial right now in Uganda. NIH is funding one part of it: the circumcision of HIV-negative people to see if that prevents HIV acquisition. Gates is funding the other part: the circumcision of HIV-positive people to see if that prevents transmission. Both parts of the trial are in the same district and have the same investigators. But NIH felt comfortable funding one part, and Gates felt comfortable funding the other part — that's a little bit riskier, to circumcise people who are HIV-positive.
Are there other differences between an NIH-funded trial and a Gates-funded research?
If you go to the NIH, you might be lucky to get a couple of million dollars to do a research project. You can go to Gates and get $40 million. They think on a bigger scale because they have the funds.
NIH can't match the scale of the Gates Foundation grants, because it has a mandate to fund research in all diseases, most of which have a U.S. or domestic base. They have to cover everything with a budget that is currently capped. Gates has chosen to focus on the big three — AIDS, TB and malaria — and childhood vaccines, and applications of this research to developing countries.
What is the foundation's reputation in the developing countries they work with?
It's superb, they're a godsend to many of these countries. They try and make a difference. Prior to the Gates Foundation, there was a real void. There were some foundations, but they didn't have the richness or financial depth. Ford, Carnegie and Rockefeller, they have also been committed to these health inequalities. But the Gates Foundation spent $1.3 billion last year. That's phenomenal, and that's on an annual basis, that makes a big difference.
Where has the foundation made the most difference so far?
I think they've made a huge difference in immunization programs. They have funded vaccine programs immensely, making them available where they weren't before and saving millions of lives. And from my perspective, that's one of their greatest achievements.
Gates is preparing to devote his work full-time to the foundation. Is that a good thing?
He is extremely bright and loves making a difference in global health. The good news is that he's traveled widely, he knows people who can make a difference, he knows how to run a big organization, and we can all agree he's done pretty well with that. We'll have to see how it plays out, but I think having Gates and his wife, Melinda, more involved on a day-to-day basis will only be good for the entire field of global health.
Editor's Note: Both Quinn and Keusch have been involved in Gates Foundation-funded projects. The Gates Foundation also provides support for coverage of global public health on NPR.