NPR logo

In Election, Mexicans Faced a Dichotomy

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
In Election, Mexicans Faced a Dichotomy


In Election, Mexicans Faced a Dichotomy

In Election, Mexicans Faced a Dichotomy

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

Michele Norris talks with Mexican political analyst and reporter Sergio Quezada about the Mexican presidential elections, which have been determined too close to call. Both leading candidates are claiming victory, and have said they'll respect a "valid" outcome. Both men, however, also say they are confident they have won by a sizable margin.


For more on the electoral stalemate in Mexico we turn to Sergio Aguayo. He's a professor at the College of Mexico and a political and social analyst for the Reformer newspaper. Professor Aguayo, thanks so much for being with us.

Dr. SERGIO AGUAYO (College of Mexico): The pleasure is mine.

NORRIS: What does this election say about the state of democracy in Mexico?

Dr. AGUAYO: Oh, it says so many things. First, that we have the capacity to organize relatively free and relatively fair elections. Now, this is perhaps the toughest test so far because there is one point separating Mr. Calderon, from the Conservative National Election Party, and Mr. Lopez Obrador, from the leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution.

And what we are going to see in the near future is more challenges to our electoral system because Mr. Lopez Obrador is going to search for evidence that perhaps some of those votes for the conservative right were not achieved in the right way and they will have a number of legal challenges that will be surrounded by media and political infighting among the two different parties. And so, in short, the country will be divided for the next few weeks.

NORRIS: One of Mexico's greatest advances has been to clean up its electoral system. If this indeed was a test of this new system to move away from a one-party system and this election was indeed largely free and transparent, it's interesting because at this point we still have two candidates and no clear winner.

Dr. AGUAYO: Yes, but what happens is that this election had no precedent in Mexico because, in the past, in our political system, there was something called the ideology of the Mexican revolution that prevented us from a clearly identified left and right. So this is the first time that we have a clearly identified election with a left and right.

Second, this is the first election that is so close, therefore there is going to be simultaneously an ideological fight and also a political and legal challenge and we don't know if the electoral system is going to sustain the attacks on it. I hope it does because otherwise we will have a period of instability and uncertainty over us.

NORRIS: You've got a close election, very big turnout and an electorate that's greatly polarized, greatly divided, so how might this impact Mexican society in the long run?

Dr. AGUAYO: That is a very good question and nobody, I think, has a clear answer because, of course, we do believe in democracy. We want democracy, but democracy has also its complexities and it can be very brutal and this time, we also saw how negative campaigning, imported from the U.S., tainted the ambiance and polarized us because all of a sudden, the conservative right started to use negative campaigning to destroy the reputation of Mr. Lopez Obrador and, of course, he and his party reacted in the same way and we had a very nasty campaign in which all sorts of attacks come from one against the other.

And this can polarize society if the candidates, media and the government does not handle in a proper, civilized way, in order not to let the country to become a social conflict.

NORRIS: Is it realistic to expect that this will be resolved in just a few weeks, or might it take longer?

Dr. AGUAYO: I think it will take a few weeks, because on Wednesday, the electoral authority is going to scrutinize each one of the polling booths and gradually there will be results legitimized, legalized by the electoral authority. But, simultaneously, the political parties are going to scrutinize the ambience of the election, how the election took place.

It will take weeks before the electoral authority and the electoral tribunal come out with a conclusion and in that period, we will have to look closely at the kind of democracy we want. Because I personally was shocked but the nastiness of the negative campaigning.

NORRIS: Sergio Aguayo is a professor at the College of Mexico. He's an analyst for the Reformer newspaper. Professor Aguayo, thanks so much.

Dr. AGUAYO: Thanks to you.

Copyright © 2006 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Will Mexico Veer Left in Upcoming Vote?

Felipe Calderon, the Mexican presidential candidate of the National Action Party (PAN), delivers a speech during a campaign rally in Acapulco, Mexico. Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption
Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP/Getty Images

Felipe Calderon, the Mexican presidential candidate of the National Action Party (PAN), delivers a speech during a campaign rally in Acapulco, Mexico.

Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP/Getty Images

The presidential candidate of the Revolution Democratic Party (PRD), Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, waves his party's flag at a political rally in Veracruz, Mexico. Alfredo Estrella/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption
Alfredo Estrella/AFP/Getty Images

Mexican presidential candidate Roberto Madrazo of the Revolutionary Institutional Party (PRI) meets supporters during a rally in Torreon City, Coahuila State, Mexico. Alfredo Estrella/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption
Alfredo Estrella/AFP/Getty Images

As Mexico's July 2 election approaches, the race has tightened between two candidates with sharply different views, illuminating a yawning ideological divide among Mexican voters.

The two leading candidates vying for the presidency come from opposite ends of the political spectrum, and Mexicans must choose which economic model they want the country to follow. The leftist Lopez Obrador wants to spend big to create jobs. The candidate further to the right, Calderon, wants to follow the free-market policies put in place by outgoing President Vicente Fox.

Until Fox's election in 2000, Mexico had been dominated by one political party — the Institutional Revolutionary Party, or PRI. For 71 years, PRI ruled the country through a system of patronage in which sitting presidents chose their successors. That stranglehold on the nation was broken when Fox, representing the conservative National Action Party, won the presidency. As Fox nears the end of his term, his approval ratings remain high, though many have been disappointed by his lackluster presidency.

A vicious negative campaign has exacerbated tensions ahead of next Sunday's vote. A win by Lopez Obrador would continue Latin America's shift to the left. Below, a look at the candidates and the issues involved:


Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador — PRD: Those who love Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador see him as a savior who will lift Mexicans out of poverty. Those who hate him say he is a dangerous demagogue. Few Mexicans are indifferent to "AMLO," as Lopez Obrador is known in Mexico City.

Lopez Obrador was born in the state of Tabasco on Nov. 13, 1953. He was the first son of shopkeeper parents and the eldest of what would be seven siblings. He became an Indian rights activist and was a founder of the leftist Party of the Democratic Revolution (the acronym for which is PRD in Spanish). He's now running on the party's ticket.

Lopez Obrador emerged as a national force in politics when he was elected mayor of Mexico City in 2000. His policies focused mainly on lower-income residents of the capital and led to widespread popular support. Many residents came out to support him when he faced impeachment proceedings in an obscure land-deal case.

Lopez Obrador survived the impeachment hearings. But the case was widely viewed as a political plot aimed at preventing him from running for president.

Lopez Obrador's tenure as mayor was again tainted when several high-profile officials within his administration were filmed receiving bribes. Lopez Obrador was not implicated in the case.

His economic proposals focus on a large campaign of public spending to boost the economy. He emphasizes creating jobs for the 40 million Mexicans who live in poverty. He wants a new overland shipping route that will rival the Panama Canal, a high-speed railway connecting cities, and the planting of one million acres of furniture-grade forest to provide jobs. He's also promising subsidies that will lower the cost of fuel and electricity.

Felipe Calderon — PAN: Felipe de Jesus Calderon was born on Oct. 18, 1962, in Morelia. He is PAN royalty. His father was a founder and influential member of PAN — the Spanish acronym for the National Action Party. Calderon trained as a lawyer in Mexico and then went on to study public policy at Harvard. He became energy secretary under President Vicente Fox. He had little name recognition when he sought the PAN nomination, and he was not Fox's choice. He is a devout Catholic and is considered a solid technocrat, somewhat lacking in charisma.

Calderon's big strength, however, is his "clean hands" image. He has promised to stamp out corruption and create a transparent government. His economic policies are focused on a free-market model that seeks to continue Fox's path of economic stability through trade and low inflation. Not surprisingly, he is the favorite of Mexico's business community.

Early in the game, Calderon was in third place in the polls, but a campaign of attack ads that sought to portray his rival Lopez Obrador as a "danger to Mexico" resonated among the middle class, and the race between the two has tightened.

Lopez Obrador struck back in the last debate, accusing Calderon of nepotism in dealings with his brother-in-law. At one point, Calderon had pulled ahead of Lopez Obrador in the polls, but he is once again trailing the former mayor of Mexico City.

Roberto Madrazo — PRI: Roberto Madrazo was born July 30, 1952, in Villahermosa, Tabasco. His family history is as tumultuous as that of the PRI itself. His parents died in a plane crash when he was 17, and some think the crash was arranged to kill Madrazo's father, a PRI president intent on reforming the party.

Madrazo studied law and earned a master's at the University of California. He has served as governor of his home state of Tabasco, which is also the home state of Lopez Obrador. The two are old rivals who ran against each other in the gubernatorial election.

Madrazo followed in his father's footsteps and became the PRI president in 2002. He is credited with re-organizing the party after the devastating 2000 election, which ended 71 years of one-party rule.

Critics say Madrazo is an old-style party boss. He's been accused of corruption and tax evasion and is running a distant third in the polls. Some key PRI leaders have said they will not support him in the election.

Madrazo is trying to occupy the middle ground by advocating social programs that focus on regional development and education. And while he may not win the election, the PRI is expected to do well in Congress. However, his defeat will probably mean a new shakeup for the party as it tries to re-brand itself.


Mexicans are interested in two things: jobs and security.

The Economy: Under the leadership of Vicente Fox, inflation has been low and the peso has been stable, but jobs are still scarce. Analysts say 1 million new jobs need to be created each year in Mexico in order to provide employment to those who are entering the work force. That hasn't happened, and economic growth has been lackluster. Nearly 50 percent of Mexicans live on less than $4 a day, yet the third-richest man in the world, Carlos Slim, is Mexican.

Crime: Drug crime. Kidnappings. Assassinations. Mexico is one of the most violent countries in the world. A recent spate of beheadings of police officers has given drug violence a new twist. Mexico is the main corridor for drugs entering the United States, and gangs are fighting for control of the trade route from Cancun to Acapulco to the border. Police are often implicated in crimes, and a tiny fraction of criminals are prosecuted.