NPR logo

Winners and Losers in Bear Stearns' Downfall

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/88382466/88382443" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Winners and Losers in Bear Stearns' Downfall

Business

Winners and Losers in Bear Stearns' Downfall

Winners and Losers in Bear Stearns' Downfall

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/88382466/88382443" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

When the dust settled from the dramatic downfall of Bear Stearns, one of Wall Street's most storied investment banks, rival JP Morgan Chase wound up taking control of it. The stunning collapse marks a significant loss for some investors, like Bear Stearns employees, who owned 30 percent of the bank.

STEVE INSKEEP, host:

So investors in JP Morgan are happy about events on Wall Street, though you cannot say the same for investors in Bear Stearns.

NPR's Scott Horsley reports on who's losing out as a result of the weekend firesale.

SCOTT HORSLEY: In about 48 hours, Bear Stearns saw it's share price tumble from New York strip steak to Hamburger Helper. JP Morgan Chase is paying just $2 a share for its venerable Wall Street rival. And for Bear Stearns investors it's a tough mouthful to swallow. As recently as last month, Bear Stearns was trading for about $80 a share. But the firm lost half it's value on Friday and most of the rest over the weekend.

Among the big losers in Bear's collapse is British billionaire Joseph Lewis. According to the Wall Street Journal, Lewis had been snapping up Bear shares since last summer, shortly after the firm revealed that two internal hedge funds had collapsed under the weight of bad bets in the subprime mortgage market.

Lewis apparently figured the market had overreacted to bad news and continued to grow his stake, even as the stock price fell. By December he owned nearly 10 percent of the investment bank. His losses since the first of the year would top $800 million.

A Dallas money management firm, Barrow, Hanley, McWhinney and Strauss, is the biggest institutional investors with more than 11 million shares, now worth just two bucks a piece.

And Bear Stearns employees owned about 30 percent of the company. Their investments are mostly gone now. They're still waiting to hear about their jobs.

Scott Horsley, NPR News.

Copyright © 2008 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Fed's Moves Highlight Fragile State of Markets

Stock traders negotiate in Sao Paolo Monday morning. Brazil's stock market dropped amid fears the global credit crisis that sank Bear Stearns would spread. hide caption

toggle caption

Stock traders negotiate in Sao Paolo Monday morning. Brazil's stock market dropped amid fears the global credit crisis that sank Bear Stearns would spread.

Listener Q&A

It's no easy task to keep up with all the intricacies of the housing crisis, the credit crunch and the rest of the economy's doldrums. NPR's Adam Davidson and former Federal Reserve governor Laurence Meyer answer listeners' questions.

The Federal Reserve took dramatic measures over the weekend to reassure the increasingly anxious investment community, including negotiating the bargain-basement sale of Bear Stearns, one of Wall Street's biggest and most storied banks. The Fed's moves raise questions about just how deep the financial industry's woes go — and what other banks might be at risk.

Here, a look at what happened and what it means for the markets:

What was the Fed's role in the sale of Bear Stearns to JP Morgan?

The Fed extended JPMorgan Chase a $30 billion credit line to help it buy rival Bear Stearns, a firm with an 85-year history on Wall Street that was on the verge of collapsing due to losses in the mortgage market. JPMorgan is getting Bear Stearns for the rock-bottom price of about $2 a share — or about $236 million. That's a stunningly low price when one considers that Bear Stearns' shares were trading at $30 each on Friday, and that its company headquarters building in New York is valued at $1 billion by itself.

Why did Bear Stearns agree to be purchased for such a fire-sale price?

Bear Stearns really had no choice. The bank is facing an onslaught of rumors about its losses in the mortgage industry, and on Friday it reported some major liquidity problems — investors were pulling their money out and the bank was short on cash. The only way for Bear Stearns to keep doing business was to let itself be bought by another firm like JPMorgan. But the deal effectively wipes out most of Bear Stearns' shareholder wealth, and it's not clear whether it will win shareholders' approval.

What about customers of Bear Stearns? Will their investments be affected?

Bear Stearns customers will become customers of JPMorgan Chase. Their accounts will transfer automatically; they don't have to do anything, says Laurence Meyer, a former Federal Reserve governor.

What would have happened if the government had not stepped in and instead allowed Bear Stearns to go bankrupt?

Bear Stearns doesn't just have its own assets — it serves as what's called a "counterparty," meaning it works as the middleman for billions of dollars in transactions. So, working people have retirement funds there, for example, and smaller banks and hedge funds can trade stocks or securities through Bear Stearns.

If the bank did go bankrupt, an unbelievably long and complex legal process would begin. Thousands of Bear Stearns customers — from individual retirees to massive hedge funds — would have huge amounts of money just frozen. Imagine how complicated a personal bankruptcy is and multiply that by tens of billions of dollars in assets. The Federal Reserve wanted to avoid that.

What other measures did the Fed take?

Perhaps the Fed's most significant move over the weekend was the creation of a new program to give emergency loans directly to the 20 largest so-called "primary dealers." These are investment banks that do business directly with the Fed and which purchase the majority of Treasury securities.

In addition, the Fed lowered the discount-lending rate — that's the rate which it charges banks for very short-term loans — by a quarter-point, to 3.25, on Sunday. It followed that on Tuesday with a cut of three-quarters of a percentage point to another key interest rate, the federal funds rate.

Why did the Fed feel the need to take such dramatic action?

It's an indication of just how precarious things are in the financial markets. The fear is that if an investment giant like Bear Stearns fails, it could spark a run on other banks with sizable exposure to troubled credit markets, creating a domino effect of defaults.

Investment banks like Bear Stearns are the lifeblood of capital markets, providing the cash flow that keeps economic gears turning. They facilitate short-term loans to businesses, raise money for corporate expansions and IPOs and assist the trading of securities. Without them, financial markets would grind to a halt.

Does the Fed's intervention mean that things might be worse on Wall Street than they appear?

It certainly feeds those suspicions. The current credit crisis is largely being fueled by fear and uncertainty. Because they are not traded on a daily basis, mortgage-backed securities are difficult to value even in the best of times. Now that the mortgage market is in free fall, it's almost impossible to gauge just how much bad debt these banks have been left holding. That has made banks extremely nervous about making even short-term loans to each other.

Are other banks in serious trouble?

Yes, and everyone is asking who's most at risk. Some of the names mentioned most frequently are UBS and Lehman Brothers, both of which have a lot of exposure to subprime and mortgage-related securities.

Why do the markets feel comfortable with the Fed actions to help JPMorgan buy Bear Stearns, but not with government action to provide relief to homeowners who cannot pay their mortgages?

Actually, the Fed's action is quite controversial. "People do worry about moral hazard, although I think that Bear Stearns was significantly punished," says former Fed governor Meyer. The Fed has taken credit risk onto its portfolio that it wasn't really set up to do, but global investment banks are really too big to simply go out of business, he adds.

But when it comes to homeowners, it's important to understand that there are actions the Federal Reserve can take, and actions that the administration and Congress would have to handle. Helping out homeowners is up to the latter. "Again, there's moral hazard issues as to whether you should do that," Meyer says. "But the problem is so significant here ... I think you could reasonably argue that it is a time for [the Treasury Department] and the administration to put some taxpayers' money at risk here, in order to reduce the risks ... and help homeowners."

With reporting by NPR's Jim Zarroli, Chris Arnold, Adam Davidson and Uri Berliner

We no longer support commenting on NPR.org stories, but you can find us every day on Facebook, Twitter, email, and many other platforms. Learn more or contact us.