RENEE MONTAGNE, host:

The Federal Communications Commission will unveil a long-awaited national plan for the Internet, tomorrow. It is supposed to allow more Americans to go online, via a broadband connection. Joel Rose has some details on the plan and what critics are saying about it.

JOEL ROSE: FCC officials wanted to know more about how people in other countries connect to the Internet, so they commissioned a study from Yochai Benkler at Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet and Society. Benkler says broadband in other developed countries is generally faster and cheaper.

Mr. YOCHAI BENKLER (Harvard's Berkman Center): You're looking at prices in the leading countries that are a third or a fifth of the prices that we are paying, and they're getting better speeds for it. So the differences are not subtle, based on what we found.

ROSE: When it comes to speed and price of Internet connections, Benkler found that American cities trail far behind their counterparts in South Korea, Sweden, even eastern Slovakia. The big reason, says Benkler, is competition. You need lots of different companies competing for your Internet business. The way other countries do this is by essentially, forcing the big companies to share their wires with the smaller ones. Benkler admits that won't be an easy sell in the U.S.

Prof. BENKLER: There will be enormous political resistance. But at the same time, the FCC has to get the next-generation market structure right. This is the moment to do it. Either you're willing to take the step to get to more competition, or you're engaged in cosmetics.

ROSE: The FCC got Benkler's report and basically said, thanks but no thanks. Blair Levin is executive director of the FCC's broadband initiative. He says what's called open access just won't work here.

Mr. BLAIR LEVIN (Executive Director, FCC Broadband Initiative): Other countries tend to have broadband dominated by a single telecom carrier, the phone company. The United States is very different. The majority of broadband subscribers actually subscribe through cable. So it's not always an apples-to-apples comparison.

ROSE: There's a bigger problem: money. Levin was also at the FCC in the 1990s, when the commission tried to impose open access on the U.S. telephone industry. The phone companies fought tooth and nail and eventually won. Private investors have not forgotten that fight, says Paul Gallant, an analyst at Concept Capital. Gallant says any start-up looking to compete with the big boys will have a tough time finding investors.

Dr. PAUL GALLANT (Analyst, Concept Capital): You have to have a stomach for a fair amount of risk. And you have to have some pretty good lawyers on your staff who could tell you that, in the end, you're going to survive the judicial gauntlet that you know the cable and phone companies are going to throw at you.

ROSE: It's unlikely the FCC or Congress would want to pick that kind of fight in an election year, says Ben Scott, policy director at the Washington, D.C., nonprofit Free Press.

Mr. BEN SCOTT (Policy Director, Free Press): Even if it's the right answer to the question which the academics at Harvard have told us it is the ways of Washington are such that tangling with the combined might of the industry on that question, I think, is not one that they're going to take on.

ROSE: But Blair Levin, at the FCC, says there's another way to get faster, cheaper broadband to U.S. consumers: Take back some of the airwaves that TV broadcasters aren't using, for wireless Internet connections.

Mr. LEVIN: If we want broadband to be available everywhere, wireless has got to be part of it. If we want it to be affordable everywhere, wireless has got to be part of it. So we don't know, necessarily, whether wireless is going to provide perfect competition to wired. But we do know it's a very important piece of the puzzle.

ROSE: In a few years, Levin says, the next generation of wireless companies may be able to compete with the big phone and cable companies that dominate Internet service today. Right now, the big players seem to like what they know about the FCC plan, to be announced in full tomorrow. That's exactly what worries Ben Scott, at Free Press.

Mr. SCOTT: If the incumbents - who have caused the problem that we have a plan to solve in the first place - are cheering that the plan is good for them, I think we have to question whether it's real reform, and whether it's going to get the job done.

ROSE: If it doesn't, the FCC may find itself looking to eastern Slovakia for better answers.

For NPR News, Im Joel Rose.

MONTAGNE: This is MORNING EDITION from NPR News.

Copyright © 2010 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.