Copyright ©2010 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

ROBERT SIEGEL, host:

From NPR News, this is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I'm Robert Siegel.

MICHELE NORRIS, host:

And I'm Michele Norris. The recent Iraqi elections and the messy aftermath have left Iraq's neighbors riveted. The surrounding Arab states were thrilled to see pro-Iranian Shiite parties lose ground and to see Sunni Arab voters throw their support behind Ayad Allawi's secular coalition.

But Iraq's neighbors are also fearful that postelection wrangling could destabilize the country. NPR's Peter Kenyon reports.

PETER KENYON: Almost immediately after Iraqi voters defied conventional wisdom by punishing the established Shiite religious parties and handing a narrow victory to a diverse, secular slate of candidates, state-controlled media in nearby Arab states seemed to experience a form of journalistic whiplash.

Even as the news pages hailed the return of Iraq's Sunni minority to politics, editorials and columnists downplayed the vote as a unique result of years of occupation and horrific violence.

Analysts say the message was clear: Arab regimes were glad to see Ayad Allawi upset Iraq's sitting Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, but they're not keen to see unexpected election results in their own countries.

Cairo analyst Mustafa el-Labbad says Arab citizens around the region couldn't help but notice that Iraqi voters displayed a power that they don't have: the power to surprise.

Mr. MUSTAFA EL-LABBAD (Analyst): Iran and most of the Arab countries are suspicious of these elections exactly because of this, because Iraq is giving now a model, how people can go to elect and to practice their rights. It's not the same in Iran, and it's not the same in Saudi Arabia, even Egypt, even Syria. So it's a good example, but this good example will suffer when the winner is not capable to build a government.

KENYON: Among those not surprised by the election results are the Iraqis who were forced to flee during the height of sectarian bloodshed a few years ago.

This restaurant in Amman, Jordan, specializes in Iraqi dishes, and it's packed. As diners select their fish from a large tank, a middle-aged Iraqi man who gives his name as Abu Ali sits and waits for his order.

Abu Ali says he was kidnapped a few years ago in Baghdad and is afraid to give his family name because things are still very uncertain in Iraq. As a Sunni, he was glad to see Allawi win, but he's not optimistic about the negotiations now under way to form a new government.

Mr. ABU ALI: (Through translator) Everybody has his own agenda. No one wants to cooperate and work for the country. And Iran is behind most of them, and as long as Iran has a hand in Iraq, we're not going to see anything good.

KENYON: Arab commentators have made much of the fact that all the major players except Allawi met in Tehran immediately after the election. But the Americans, the Saudis, the Turks and the Syrians are also seeking to influence the outcome.

Jordanian analyst Labib Kamhawi says while a regression into violence is always possible, there are reasons to hope that compromise will prevail over chaos.

Mr. LABIB KAMHAWI (Analyst): You have to look at it in a sober way. The lesser of two evils would prevail. The Saudis, the Egyptians, the Jordanians, they don't want to see a pro-Iranian regime in Iraq. Now the Iranians might try to pull a deal with the Americans. They know the Americans want to make sure that if they start pulling out, the regime in power in Iraq is not in the hands of the Iranians. So they might simply acquiesce to Allawi forming a government under certain conditions.

KENYON: Analysts say all the neighboring states, including Iran, have a strong interest in not seeing Iraq slide back into chaos, and that suggests that, eventually, a compromise will be reached. But whether Iraq will emerge as a stable democracy is another matter.

Jordanian analyst Oraib Rantawi says it will take more than one election to answer that question.

Mr. ORAIB RANTAWI (Analyst): Democracy in general, it's not only about procedures and mechanisms. It's also about values. In Iraq we have the procedures now, we have mechanisms, but when it comes to the values, we don't have that much. Therefore, Maliki remained in power for three to four years, and he wants to stay forever, and he will want to repeat Saddam Hussein's model of ruling a country.

KENYON: The current analysis suggests that neither Maliki nor Allawi will be the next Iraqi prime minister. But whoever emerges from the negotiations will continue to face intense interest and conflicting pressures from the neighbors.

Peter Kenyon, NPR News.

Copyright © 2010 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.