STEVE INSKEEP, host:
It's MORNING EDITION from NPR News. Good morning, Im Steve Inskeep.
Today, President Obama meets leading senators, they will discuss a nomination he has yet to make - his choice for a Supreme Court seat. When he meets those senators, he will know they have yet to act on scores of his other nominations. Those nominees are being held hostage by a Senate tradition any senator can privately put a hold on a nomination, meaning that the choice for a government office is stopped; and Republicans have done that again and again.
Now, Democrats have gone on the offensive.
NPR's David Welna reports.
DAVID WELNA: As the week began, 99 of President Obama's executive and judicial branch nominees were stalled by holds, in some cases for more than a year. A hold is essentially a threat to filibuster a nomination.
Rhode Island Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse says Republicans are simply trying to score political points against the president.
Senator SHELDON WHITEHOUSE (Democrat, Rhode Island): This is not about controversial nominees. This is about politics, plain and simple; bare-knuckled politics of obstruction.
WELNA: What it's led to is a pileup of nominations and a lot of bad blood.
Professor PAUL LIGHT (Wagner School of Public Service, New York University): It is the worst ever.
WELNA: That's presidential nominations expert Paul Light of New York University. He says dragging out confirmations is nothing new, and both Democrats and Republicans have done it. But, he says, the delays now are unprecedented, and word has spread that the nomination ordeal is not worth it.
Prof. LIGHT: Anecdotally, what I hear is that two, three, four people are refusing invitations to serve before they get to one who'll go through this process. It has just become a very ugly process, very dispiriting.
WELNA: Take, for example, a nominee the Senate did finally confirm yesterday. Half the Republicans and all the Democrats voted to confirm Lael Brainard as the Treasury Department's undersecretary for international affairs - 13 months after she was nominated. Republicans raised questions about tax deductions she'd taken.
Kentucky Republican Jim Bunning urged colleagues not to confirm her.
Senator JIM BUNNING (Republican, Kentucky): This is not just a matter of taxes, it is a matter of trust.
WELNA: Unlike most of the current holds, Bunning's was public. As Missouri Democrat Claire McCaskill pointed out yesterday, most senators won't acknowledge having put holds on nominees.
Senator CLAIRE MCCASKILL (Democrat, Missouri): You want to know why the country doesn't trust us. It's 'cause of this kind of nonsense, this kind of secret hold shenanigans.
WELNA: McCaskill says 80 or so nominees remain stalled by secret holds, and she's trying to reveal the holds' authors by demanding votes on those nominees.
Yesterday, Number Two Senate Republican Jon Kyl objected to McCaskill's requests for votes. He did so on behalf of colleagues whose names he did not reveal. Kyl says fewer holds would be better.
Senator JON KYL (Republican, Arizona): I am not defending a lot of holds. And I - though I was...
WELNA: Do you think they're excessive right now?
Sen. KYL: They might well be. I don't know.
WELNA: The irony, says nominations expert Paul Light, is that President Obama has had to go around the Senate to fill out his team.
Prof. LIGHT: There are a lot of these jobs that are now filled by acting officials or non-Senate confirmed presidential appointees, and the Senate should be outraged by it. Yet, they dither with these holds that result in very significant problems with governing.
WELNA: The Democrats' nomination offensive does seem to be working. Two long-stalled district court judges got confirmed yesterday. And holds were lifted on a nominee for assistant attorney general and two for circuit courts - they'll be voted on today and tomorrow.
David Welna, NPR News, the Capitol.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.