Copyright ©2010 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

STEVE INSKEEP, host:

You just heard the phrase no actual surprise. Let's consider that for a moment. Many of the leaked documents reveal something we don't expect in a cynical age: American diplomats were telling the truth. Many private cables confirm the outlines of what U.S. diplomats have said in public. Consider corruption in Afghanistan. Americans have said it's a problem. Although the leaks do add to our understanding of that problem, as NPR's Jackie Northam reports.

JACKIE NORTHAM: This latest round of leaked diplomatic cables highlights two pervasive challenges the U.S. faces in Afghanistan: corruption and dealing with President Hamid Karzai. The cables clearly show how pervasive, corrosive, and just how far up the political ladder the corruption reaches.

Patrick Cronin, a senior advisor at the Center for a New American Security, says much of the information was already known, but there's more to be gleaned from the cables.

Mr. PATRICK CRONIN (Center for a New American Security): You can find new insights into our own conduct of this war, our own conduct of our diplomacy. Even though there's nothing new, there are new vivid details about corruption, about the challenge that we face, really, toward trying to achieve a political objective and an outcome.

NORTHAM: And while much of this information has come out in congressional hearings or through the media, Cronin says it makes a difference to see the concerns and complaints written down on paper.

Mr. CRONIN: To see something in print makes a difference. It does give it more impact. To see the actual cable arrests your mind and says, my goodness, this is serious.

NORTHAM: Some of the diplomatic cables illustrate the scale of the graft: officials taking vast sums of money or paying huge bribes to secure lucrative positions of power.

One cable talks about the brother of a revered military commander, Ahmed Shah Massoud, who was killed by suspected al-Qaida militants. The brother, Ahmed Zia Massoud, is a politician with a salary of a few hundred dollars a month. The diplomatic cable says last year he was caught carrying $50 million on arrival in Dubai. Massoud denies the allegation.

Mr. AHMED ZIA MASSOUD: (Through translator) How one person can carry $50 million - where is the proof of this $50 million? I am ready to answer anywhere I am required. This is completely wrong and incorrect.

NORTHAM: Other cables describe how efforts by U.S. anti-corruption officials, along with their Afghan counterparts, trying to curb graft were thwarted by senior government officials, including President Karzai. Many of the secret messages to Washington paint Karzai as a deeply troubled and insecure man. Cables written by U.S. Ambassador Karl Eikenberry point to Karzai's mood swings and his tendency to blame the U.S. for all that's wrong in Afghanistan.

Christine Fair with Georgetown University's Peace and Security Studies Program says none of these criticisms will be new to Karzai.

Ms. CHRISTINE FAIR (Georgetown University): It's easy to point the finger at Karzai because he is so deeply culpable of so many problems. But it really has to be remembered that this is a synergistic relationship and the way in which we have dealt with Karzai, local strongmen, to serve the purposes of our counterinsurgency, is quite frankly hypocritical at best.

NORTHAM: For example, Fair says look at the way the U.S. treats Karzai's brother, Ahmed Wali Karzai, who's head of the provincial council in Kandahar. Several cables focus on his alleged ties to Afghanistan's opium trade.

Ms. FAIR: It's one thing to be very clear that he is a part of an enormous drug-trafficking network that nets all sorts of proceeds that go into various pockets, but how about the reality that he's been on the CIA payroll?

NORTHAM: But the diplomatic cables are not meant to analyze or offer solutions, says Thomas Johnson, an Afghanistan expert at the Naval Postgraduate School. The cables are just raw data and observations, but when they're leaked like this, they can send out the wrong signal, says Johnson.

Mr. THOMAS JOHNSON (Naval Postgraduate School): The average Afghan looks at us and says, why is it taking so long, and they've completely lost confidence in us. So many of the average Afghans will look at this and say, hey, you know, their perception is the United States just isn't doing enough. There's some truth in that, but there's a much bigger story, actually.

NORTHAM: Johnson says at least this batch of leaked documents has not put anybody's life in danger. The last time WikiLeaks revealed secret and confidential documents on Afghanistan, local translators and informers were named, placing them in jeopardy.

Jackie Northam, NPR News, Washington.

INSKEEP: You hear some of the most thorough coverage of Afghanistan right here on MORNING EDITION from NPR News.

Copyright © 2010 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Support comes from: