Copyright ©2011 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

DAVID GREENE, host:

It's MORNING EDITION from NPR News. Good morning. I'm David Greene.

RENEE MONTAGNE, host:

And I'm Renee Montagne.

In scientific meetings and science departments at universities, you won't see a lot of African-American faces. And a study in the journal Science finds that black scientists who do start careers in medical research are at a big disadvantage when it comes to funding. NPR's Richard Harris reports.

RICHARD HARRIS: People have been trying to do something about racial disparities in the world of science for several decades. Dr. William Lawson, who's chairman of the psychiatry department at Howard University in Washington, D.C., has thought a lot about how to increase the number of black research psychiatrists. He says for one thing, they're more likely to study issues important to that group.

Dr. WILLIAM LAWSON (Howard University): First of all, just becoming a scientist is, for many of them, a challenging part of their lives as well, because all along the line there are many barriers towards reaching that level.

HARRIS: He says African-Americans who do get jobs in academia tend to focus on teaching and clinical practice, which they see as serving their communities, instead of research. And blacks often come into science without all the personal connections that others may have.

Dr. LAWSON: A research enterprise, like any business or anything else, it helps to know the folks who have been successful and involved.

HARRIS: Once black scientists get academic jobs, their challenges don't end. That's where the latest study comes in. Dr. Raynard Kington, president of Grinnell College, wondered whether black scientists got as much grant support from the National Institutes of Health as other scientists. He's a former deputy director of the NIH.

Kington and his colleagues took into account factors like the nature of institutions where black scientists work, their training and their history of landing research grants.

Dr. RAYNARD KINGTON (President, Grinnell College): My personal expectation was that we would be able to explain lots of the differences that we saw. I thought we'd see differences and that we'd be able to explain by factors like that. And that really hasn't - that turned out not to be the case.

HARRIS: And that grant gap was quite substantial. Getting a grant is never easy, but in round numbers, white researchers succeeded about 25 percent of the time, and blacks succeeded about 15 percent of the time. An obvious question is whether this is the result of overt racism.

Dr. KINGTON: We can't rule it out, but that's not what we think is happening. I think the more compelling case is that it is unconscious in various ways.

HARRIS: The review teams who decide who should get scarce research dollars may be picking up subtle clues from the applications, Kington suggests.

Dr. KINGTON: Although race is not identified in applications, it remains fairly easy, I would argue, to infer race for many applicants.

HARRIS: And there's lots of research that shows people in the general public have subtle biases against people with, for example, black-sounding names.

Dr. KINGTON: Scientists are human. Scientists have the biases of society in many ways, in spite of their scientific training.

HARRIS: So he says it's worth investigating whether that's playing a role in the committees that hand out grants. Kington says it's also a much broader issue than one of racial discrimination. It could mean that grants aren't being awarded on pure merit.

Dr. KINGTON: If indeed we are biased in the way that we review some of our applications, that means that the American people's money may not be going to the strongest scientific ideas.

HARRIS: The new research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, which has been trying to address these discrepancies. Dr. Francis Collins, the NIH director, was not happy to hear the results.

Dr. FRANCIS COLLINS (Director, NIH): That's a huge discrepancy, and something that we are deeply troubled about and are determined to do something about.

HARRIS: One idea is to recruit more up-and-coming black scientists to serve on the committees that actually evaluate the grant applications.

Dr. COLLINS: It's clear that that experience, where you get a chance to see other applications, and how they fare in the peer-review process, is very helpful when one sits down to write one's own grant.

HARRIS: Collins is also interested in expanding mentoring programs, though Kington, a black scientist,�says that's a two-edged sword.

Dr. KINGTON: Every institution I've been at, I would regularly get requests from minority students, to mentor them, and almost always at a rate substantially higher than my peers. Some people refer to that as the black tax.

HARRIS: So the issues here appear to be deep, without easy answers.

Richard Harris, NPR News.

Copyright © 2011 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Support comes from: