Copyright ©2011 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.

(Soundbite of music)


Of all the subjects a first-time novelist might attempt, America in the wake of September 11th would seem like a really unwise choice. It's too ambitious, too fraught, just too much. Fortunately, says book critic Maureen Corrigan, Amy Waldman didn't get that memo. Waldman served as co-chief of the South Asia bureau of The New York Times, and her short fiction has been published in The Atlantic. Her debut novel about September 11th is called "The Submission," and Maureen calls it a triumph.

MAUREEN CORRIGAN: "The Submission" is a gorgeously written novel of ideas about America in the wake of September 11th. It tackles subjects like identity politics, undocumented immigrants and the stress fractures of democracy. Maybe the most audacious question that's posed by Amy Waldman's debut novel, however, is the implicit one that lingers long after a reader finishes it: Namely, could it be that a decade after the attacks, America finally has the 9/11 novel - one that does justice, artistically and historically, to the aftershocks of that day?

Of course, there have been other serious fiction contenders that have ruminated on September 11th: among them, Joseph O'Neill's "Netherland," Deborah Eisenberg's short story collection, "Twilight of the Superheroes," Don DeLillo's "Falling Man," and Ken Kalfus' dark tour de force, "A Disorder Peculiar to the Country." But "The Submission" distinguishes itself by its panoramic scope and, also, by the ease with which it pulls off the literary magic trick of being at once, poetic and polemical.

Arguments about America are hashed out relentlessly on the pages of this novel, and yet, Waldman never stints on character development, plot or the pleasures of her inventive language. Ever the English teacher, I even found myself making lists of all the startling verbs and metaphors Waldman comes up with. For instance, describing a tough woman laughing, meanly, at another's expense Waldman writes: Her laugh burst forth, breaking up her face like jackhammered cement. This is an assured, ambitious novel that appeals to both a reader's senses and intelligence.

The central situation here will sound more contrived in my summary than it is in Waldman's execution. Here goes: Two years after the attacks, a jury of artists, academics and one non-credentialed civilian - a 9/11 widow - has been convened to sift through some 5,000 blind design entries for a memorial at the site of ground zero. In the opening chapter, a winner is chosen, and then, the dumbfounded jury learns that their pick is a Muslim-American architect named Mohammed Khan. The chief champion of Khan's design was the 9/11 widow, Claire Burwell.

Waldman succinctly characterizes Claire's grief for her late husband this way: It had been two years. He appeared in her dreams but vanished on waking, and she spoke of him in qualities - positive, ebullient, smart, principled - that had no texture. Claire initially loves the design for a rectangular walled garden as a memorial - especially, the fact that it would be composed of both life-affirming greenery, as well as steel trees made out of salvaged scraps from the World Trade Center. But, as soon as Khan's name is leaked to the public, controversy rages about the identity of the architect and his garden design. It seems Islamic to some critics. In fact, Lou Sarge, a Rush Limbaugh-like radio personality, charges that the garden is Mohammed Khan's sly strategy to construct an Islamic martyr's paradise on ground zero. Claire finds herself pressured to rethink her support for the garden. At a raucous public hearing in New York, one bereaved father poignantly states his objections. We, who have carried the weight of loss, are now being asked to carry the weight of proving America's tolerance.

Khan himself is an aloof guy who doesn't play well to the media: He's outraged that, as an American, he should even be called upon to justify his patriotism. As more and more voices pile into the national debate, the arguments become more complicated. A scholar opines that the World Trade Center Towers, themselves, contained Islamic architectural features. another 9/11 widow speaks out to ask if there will even be a place for her husband's name on whatever memorial will be built, given that he was one of the many undocumented immigrants who worked at the Towers, cleaning bathrooms and hallways.

"The Submission" is sure to generate a lot of discussion in book clubs across the land about the promises of democracy. In so doing, Waldman's novel itself serves as a powerful memorial to 9/11 and the struggles of America in its aftermath.

GROSS: Maureen Corrigan teaches literature at Georgetown University. She reviewed "The Submission" by Amy Waldman. You can read an excerpt on our website,, where you can download Podcasts of our show.

I'm Terry Gross.

(Soundbite of music)

Copyright © 2011 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.



Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the Community rules and Terms of Use. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.