MELISSA BLOCK, host: From NPR News, this is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I'm Melissa Block.

ROBERT SIEGEL, host: And I'm Robert Siegel.

President Obama spoke to the American Legion today in Minneapolis, and he said America's military is the best that it's ever been.

President BARACK OBAMA: We saw that most recently in the skill and precision of our brave forces who helped the Libyan people finally break free from the grip of Moammar Gadhafi.

SIEGEL: The nature of U.S. involvement in Libya has been controversial. NPR's Ari Shapiro reports on whether the outcome, at least so far, vindicates President Obama's approach to the conflict.

ARI SHAPIRO: President Obama has only given one major speech on the U.S. mission in Libya. It was five months ago, at the National Defense University here in Washington.

OBAMA: We are naturally reluctant to use force to solve the world's many challenges. But when our interests and values are at stake, we have a responsibility to act.

SHAPIRO: He described an approach to foreign intervention that emphasizes international coalitions and acknowledges the real world limitations on American power. People looking for a clear Obama doctrine had a hard time finding it.

That lack of ideological purity seems appropriate to Aaron David Miller of the Woodrow Wilson International Center. Miller was an advisor to Republican and Democratic secretaries of state on the Middle East. And he says rigid doctrines tend to get the U.S. into trouble.

Dr. AARON DAVID MILLER: Doctrine is not the issue. The issue when it comes to American foreign policy should cut across one divide. Is it smart because it protects American national interests in a way that is possible? Or is it dumb? And the reality is, in Libya, the president's policy seems to be on the smart side.

SHAPIRO: Miller says the U.S. approach to Libya has hardly been perfect, but in the end, the approach succeeded. To the President's critics, that ultimate success is not enough. They want a clearer road map.

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney spoke today to the Veterans of Foreign Wars' national convention in San Antonio.

MITT ROMNEY (REPUBLICAN, PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE): Our involvement in Libya was marked by inadequate clarity of purpose before we began the mission, and then mission muddle during the operation, and ongoing confusion as to our role in the future.

SHAPIRO: But other Republicans applaud the president's success in Libya, even if it the outcome occasionally seemed uncertain. Robert Kagan is a senior fellow in foreign policy at the Brookings Institution.

Dr. ROBERT KAGAN: A lot of pieces fell into place that made this work. But the administration deserves tremendous credit for seeing it through, and against a lot of, I think, unreasonable criticism from all sides.

SHAPIRO: President Obama's leadership style has always valued pragmatism over idealism, and not only in foreign policy. He says he's more interested in solving problems than in sticking to a rigid dogma. That can be frustrating to his friends and critics alike, who complain that they don't know what the president believes in from one situation to the next.

Ben Rhodes is the White House's deputy national security advisor for strategic communications. He says the administration is focused on how best to achieve American interests on a case by case basis.

BEN RHODES: I don't think you want to have a doctrine that is so broad that it would lead you to intervene in country after country, and send you down a slippery slope of military interventions that we don't want to pursue.

SHAPIRO: He says the U.S. does apply universal principles to every country.

RHODES: We oppose violence by governments against their citizens. We support the universal rights of people around the world - the right to choose their own leaders and have basic fundamental freedoms. And we are supporting across the Middle East and North Africa a process of political and economic change that's responsive to the people of the region.

SHAPIRO: That support sometimes comes in the form of sanctions or simply words. But that wasn't enough in Libya, where military power came into play. And it may not be enough for people seeking revolution in other countries, either.

Michele Dunne directs the Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East at the Atlantic Council.

Dr. MICHELE DUNNE: Certainly the question of U.S. involvement is going to be raised increasingly now in places like Syria, Yemen, and, who knows, perhaps Iran in the future, because of Libya. Libya has now created a different model.

SHAPIRO: A different model perhaps but, in the eyes of the Obama White House, not a universal one.

Ari Shapiro, NPR News, Washington.

Copyright © 2011 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.