NPR logo

Europe's Dilemma: More Integration Or Less?

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Europe's Dilemma: More Integration Or Less?


Europe's Dilemma: More Integration Or Less?

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

STEVE INSKEEP, host: It's MORNING EDITION from NPR News. Good morning. I'm Steve Inskeep.

DAVID GREENE, host: And I'm David Greene. European nations still haven't settled on a solution to the problem that's endangering their prosperity.

INSKEEP: Some European nations are financially weak - especially Greece, whose leaders are in emergency meetings as they edge near default.

GREENE: Some nations are financially strong - especially Germany, Europe's biggest economy.

INSKEEP: The weak nations need help. The strong nations don't want to pay for other's mistakes. But many are bound together by a common currency - the euro.

GREENE: Which means they're affected by each other's fates. NPR's Tom Gjelten says Europeans seem to be struggling to decide if they should come together or drift apart.

TOM GJELTEN: Years from now, historians will no doubt say this was a crisis waiting to happen. The people who came up with the idea of a eurozone stopped halfway. The participating countries would use a common currency, but they wouldn't have common tax and spending policies - a monetary union, but not a fiscal union. The debt crisis has now shown governments it's hard to have it both ways. Either they coordinate their tax and spending policies, or they face a breakup of their currency union.

Jacob Kirkegaard, of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, says it's like the Europeans built only half a house - and half a house can't stand on its own.

JACOB KIRKEGAARD: Europe basically faces a choice. It can either dismantle the piece that they built earlier, or they can build the other half of the house, so to speak.

GJELTEN: Dismantling the European house would mean moving away from that common euro currency. This could present serious problems. Governments could default on their euro currency debts. The banks that have loaned those governments money would themselves be put in jeopardy. Interbank lending could freeze up. U.S. banks would be hurt. On the other hand, finishing that European house - adding the fiscal union to the monetary union - would also bring dramatic changes. George Friedman heads Stratfor, a private intelligence firm.

GEORGE FRIEDMAN: Europe, at its center, would be dictating things like budgets, would be controlling deficits.

GJELTEN: Telling government when to raise taxes and by how much. Jacob Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute says a change like this could require years of legal reform.

KIRKEGAARD: Not only do you have to change the European treaty, which we know is in itself a multiyear process, but you quite likely also have to change the German constitution.

GJELTEN: Because as it's written, it strictly limits how the German government can spend money, provisions that would keep Germany from joining a European fiscal union. Fundamentally, this is all a problem for the Europeans to resolve, but the United States is hardly indifferent to the crisis. The Obama administration has said it wants the Europeans to move ahead on building their common house.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner actually got himself invited to a European finance ministers' meeting in Poland last Friday. Before going, he told CNBC that the Europeans need to do what it takes, quote, to hold this thing together.

Secretary TIMOTHY GEITHNER: I think they recognize they've been behind the curve. And I think they recognize that they're going to have to do more to earn the confidence of the world, that they have the political will to do this.

GJELTEN: In Poland, Geithner pressed the Europeans, but there was little sign after the meeting that the ministers were ready to take the kind of bold action Geithner was advocating. George Friedman says Geithner should not have been surprised.

FRIEDMAN: From the American point of view, this is a financial crisis. To the extent that it's a political crisis, the United States has to simply stand by and watch the Europeans play this out. We really aren't in a position to influence the political crisis.

GJELTEN: With so much at stake and such strong arguments on both sides, it's hard to predict now which way the Europeans will go - toward more unity or less. But George Friedman says one thing is clear: When this crisis is finally resolved, there will be a new definition of Europe.

FRIEDMAN: We have seen Europe for 20 years in prosperity, where many of these issues were submerged. We're now seeing a Europe in which they have emerged, and everybody is taking a very close second look at it.

GJELTEN: That means there's uncertainty. And if there's one thing investors don't like, it is uncertainty. No wonder, says Jacob Kirkegaard, that stock and bond markets in the United States as well as in Europe reflect great anxiety right now.

KIRKEGAARD: I think the markets are correct in their assessment that there is a number of problems facing the European economies that European political leaders have not owned up to.

GJELTEN: But time is running out, and big decisions about Europe's future can't be put off much longer. Tom Gjelten, NPR News, Washington.

Copyright © 2011 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.