STEVE INSKEEP, host:
As some people rethink the environment, commentator Frank Deford is rethinking a reputation. In particular, it's the reputation of Bill Belichick. As head coach of the New England Patriots, Belichick has led his team to three Super Bowl titles. This season started much less gloriously. Belichick and the New England Patriots were fined $750,000 for using a video camera to record the opposing team's signals. For Deford, it was not the first disappointment.
FRANK DEFORD: I'm always touched when, after all the savagery of a football game, the opposing players and coaches mingle pleasantly in the middle of the gridiron. So it is that my lasting image of Bill Belichick came at the conclusion of the AFC championship game in January after his Patriots had been beaten by Indianapolis.
The Colts' magnificent quarterback, Peyton Manning, spotted Belichick and sought him out in a crowd. But Belichick ducked away, brushed by Manning, refusing to pay homage to the man who had been most responsible for his team's defeat. The look on Manning's face: some embarrassment, but mostly, it seemed, disappointment mixed with surprise.
Somehow it struck me as all the sadder, because Manning and Belichick were not just football ships passing in the night. They are shared heirs of the game. And more sweetly, they are triumph, the children of devotion: Manning, the son of the gallant Archie, who was himself a superior quarterback doomed to bad teams - Belichick, the son of a lifelong coach who toiled in the vineyards, never approaching the glory his son would enjoy.
Belichick's biographer, the late David Halberstam, gamely played up this angle, desperately trying to infuse some warm blood into his cold, cold veins.
Now, though, we see Belichick as not merely surly and ungracious - a pigskin match for the diamond grouch who bares his duplicate initials - BB, Barry Bonds - but, likewise, a defiler of his game.
To me, in fact, Belichick is most analogous to Richard Nixon. Both men were so smart, yet so uncomfortable. Both could never accept the success they carved out for themselves. Perhaps, even after three Super Bowls, Belichick never feels that he deserves to be in the best company, for he himself was no good as a player.
And for both - oh, so pointless. Everything else aside about Watergate, it wasn't necessary. Nixon was a lock to win the next election, and he did, taking 49 states. What intelligence could he possibly steal from the Democrats? Belichick's Patriots are better than ever. What could possibly be gained by stealing signals from some hopelessly outmanned opponent?
Commissioner Roger Goodell could have punished Belichick even more harshly than he chose to. But then, why bother? The shame that Bill Belichick suffers is worse than any penalty. He cheated the game of football, tarnishing the one thing he seems to care for. His genius and his victories alike will forever be suspect. At least Nixon always had China.
INSKEEP: Frank Deford joins us each Wednesday from member station WSHU in Fairfield, Connecticut.
By the way, you can read a brief history of cheating in sports, from the Chicago Black Sox scandal to the case of the betting NBA referee, at npr.org.
(Soundbite of music)
INSKEEP: It's MORNING EDITION from NPR News. I'm Steve Inskeep.
RENEE MONTAGNE, host:
And I'm Renee Montagne.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.