AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:
It's ALL THINGS CONSIDERED, from NPR News. I'm Audie Cornish.
ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:
And I'm Robert Siegel.
New research suggests that some women in their 40s would benefit from routine mammograms every two years. As NPR's Rob Stein reports, researchers are trying to resolve a long debate over the benefits and harms of mammography in younger women.
ROB STEIN, BYLINE: For years, the mantra was that mammograms save lives. So many people were stunned back in 2009, when an influential panel of experts basically said, wait a minute. The panel questioned whether all women in their 40s should routinely get a mammogram every year or two. Michael LeFevre is on that panel.
DR. MICHAEL LEFEVRE: The benefit of mammography in the 40s is not as large as it is later in life, and it's not as large as most people assume it to be. And there are some harms associated with mammography.
STEIN: Those harms include scaring women with false alarms, making them come back for repeated X-rays, getting biopsies, surgery, radiation and chemo they don't need.
DR. JEANE MANDELBLATT: Mammography may pick up small tumors that never would have progressed to harm them in their lifetimes.
STEIN: That's Jeane Mandelblatt of Georgetown University.
MANDELBLATT: Yet, they'll undergo treatment for breast cancer when that disease, if it had been never detected, would have never bothered the woman.
STEIN: The expert panel did conclude that a mammogram every other year is a good idea for women in their 50s. So Mandelblatt and her colleagues decided to see if there were some 40-somethings who had about the same risk as women in their 50s. They analyzed data from millions of women - mammograms and breast cancer cases - from dozens of published studies and huge databases.
MANDELBLATT: The studies were designed to identify what was the risk level that would be the tipping point so that the balance of benefits and harms would be the same as what's currently recommended for starting at age 50.
STEIN: Their conclusion? Getting a mammogram every couple of years does make sense for some women in their 40s - those who have very dense breasts, and those who have a close relative - a mother, sister or daughter - who had breast cancer.
MANDELBLATT: They're twice as likely to develop breast cancer as the average woman. And that higher risk of developing breast cancer tips the balance to having more benefit to the harms.
STEIN: The researchers say the findings will help guide women. Dr. Karla Kerlikowske is a San Francisco breast cancer expert who worked on the studies.
DR. KARLA KERLIKOWSKE: Whether you're in your 40s, 50s or your 60s, your screening should be based on what your risk is. And if you're a 40-year-old who's at high risk of breast cancer, then undergoing mammography every two years makes sense for that person. If you're a 40-year-old person who is at very low risk, waiting till you're 50 is reasonable.
STEIN: But for a lot of women, according to Fran Visco of the National Breast Cancer Coalition, the answer still remains far from clear.
DR. FRAN VISCO: There is no absolute answer for women in their 40s, or even in their 50s. There is no absolute answer. You fall into this category, you should be screened, that will save your life - it's just not that simple.
STEIN: But not everyone agrees. Radiologist Daniel Kopans, at Harvard, argues screening all women in their 40s, clearly, saves lives.
DR. DANIEL KOPANS: These papers are just several more in a series of papers that, I think, are misleading women and their physicians. And I think if women really appreciated what they're being told, they would be outraged.
STEIN: Dr. Carol Lee, of the American College of Radiology, worries the research could end up costing lives.
DR. CAROL LEE: This may discourage women who don't have an identifiable risk factor from seeking screening and therefore, the potential life-saving benefit of screening won't be realized.
STEIN: The American Cancer Society still recommends all women in their 40s get screened every year. Otis Brawley, the society's chief medical officer, says he's not ready to change that profile.
DR. OTIS BRAWLEY: I don't think that we're ready to actually have, as a widespread policy, that we would use these profiles to determine who should get screened and who should not get screened.
STEIN: But, he says, the new studies are clearly a step in that direction.
BRAWLEY: I can easily see, in the next several years, that we would be using these profiles.
STEIN: In the meantime, it's up to doctors and their patients to weigh the pros and cons of mammograms for women in their 40s themselves.
Rob Stein, NPR News.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.