NPR logo

Dems Test Bush's Pledge to Veto Budget-Busters

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/15579667/15583489" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Dems Test Bush's Pledge to Veto Budget-Busters

Politics

Dems Test Bush's Pledge to Veto Budget-Busters

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/15579667/15583489" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

STEVE INSKEEP, host:

President Bush has said he will veto spending bills if they cost more than what he requested. And Congress apparently is willing to let him try. The Senate last night passed a health and education funding bill that exceeds the president's budget by nearly $9 billion.

NPR's David Welna reports.

DAVID WELNA: If there's one annual spending measure nearly every lawmaker has a stake in, it's the huge labor, health and human services bill. Not only does it bankroll education programs, health services and research benefiting constituents across the nation, the Senate version also has $400 million worth of earmarks for both Democrats and Republicans.

Democrats are portraying President Bush's threat to veto this bill as heartless, just as they did when he vetoed expanding health care coverage for low-income children. In an appeal to the voting public, New Jersey Democrat Bob Menendez put it in terms of guns for that war versus butter for the American people.

Senator ROBERT MENENDEZ (Democrat, New Jersey): Congress is going to ask the president flat out if you're worth our support. And right now President Bush is saying he's going to take his pen and write N-O, no.

WELNA: It's a fight Democrats seem to relish. They've cast themselves as the champions of domestic priorities in contrast to a president wed to a widely unpopular war on the other side of the world.

The Senate's number two Democrat, Dick Durbin, says the cost of that war is what President Bush and others who call themselves fiscal conservatives should really be upset about.

Senator RICHARD DURBIN (Illinois, Democrat): He's asking for almost $200 billion for this war in Iraq, and quibbling and fighting with us over $22 billion so that we can deal with some of the issues we face at home. We want to make that difference between the president and the Congress very clear.

WELNA: There's no mystery what's going on here, says University of Pennsylvania budget expert Donald Kettl. President Bush needs his fellow Republicans in Congress to sustain vetoes. So Kettl says Democrats have decided to send him bills that could cause considerable pain at the polls for Republicans who side with him.

Dr. DONALD KETTL (University of Pennsylvania): The Democrats are trying very hard to set President Bush up for bills that, on the one hand, he doesn't want to sign, but on the other hand can give them the issues that they want going into next year's campaign.

WELNA: The question is whether congressional Republicans will continue siding with their president in the brewing spending battle. Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell bets they will.

Senator MITCH McCONNELL (Senate Minority Leader; Kentucky, Democrat): I think there is substantial feeling in my conference that we ought to hold these discretionary accounts to the overall amount that the president requested in order to show some willingness to restrain spending.

WELNA: And yet the White House wants to see more willingness to unleash spending as long as it's for the war in Iraq. White House Secretary Dana Perino said yesterday that President Bush wants lawmakers to approve his war funding request by year's end.

Ms. DANA PERINO (White House Press Secretary): So the president is going to call on them to get this work done before they leave for the holidays. It's the least that they could do for the troops.

Representative DAVID OBEY (Democrat, Wisconsin): We can look at it next year, but I have no intention of considering that supplemental this year.

WELNA: That's the unhurried chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, Democrat David Obey. He is ready to defy President Bush's many veto threats. Still, Obey thinks Mr. Bush, in the end, could prevail.

Rep. OBEY: He thinks he can govern this country with one-third plus one, which is enough to sustain any veto. And he thinks that he can run the country with, in essence, a minority government. And he has an advantage in that so long as he's got enough lemmings in the Congress to follow him over the cliff.

WELNA: That might help Democrats win more seats in Congress next year, but it also means that in this fight President Bush could have the upper hand.

David Welna, NPR News, the Capitol.

Copyright © 2007 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Comments

 

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.