NPR logo

Comparing Sports, Arts Is Dangerous Business

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/16262355/16281077" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Comparing Sports, Arts Is Dangerous Business

Comparing Sports, Arts Is Dangerous Business

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/16262355/16281077" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

STEVE INSKEEP, host:

Okay, every Wednesday morning, we hear from our weekly sports commentator, Frank Deford, and lately, Frank has been hearing a lot from you.

FRANK DEFORD: A few weeks ago, in this time, I offered up the thoughts of Gary Walters, the distinguished athletic director of Princeton, that sports should be held in the same high regard as art. I thought it was a rather interesting and cogent opinion for someone to posit, but in the fabled words of a longtime football announcer Keith Jackson: Whoa, Nellie. Never have I suffered such a battering. I think the nicest thing I was called in the responses that poured in, dripping with blood, was apologist dingbat.

But then, after I withdrew the slings and arrows from my person and assessed the reaction, I realize how almost all the responses didn't really bother to address the question posed: whether, in fact, sport might be an art. No, they were just mad, full of rage and fury. But it did serve to inform me all the more how much antipathy there does exist toward the American system of school sports.

Let me just read you a few of the more restrained comments.

(Reading) Spare me, please. Primary and secondary art and music programs are going the way of the passenger pigeon while college coaching staffs are compensated like CEOs.

When was the last time we heard a news report about the bands or orchestra at some powerhouse involved in a scandal where students did not take the test themselves?

High school building and renovation plans always include gymnasiums and weight rooms, but auditoriums are more viewed as unnecessary expenditures.

I think what exasperates so many people is that the situation only grows more lopsided that sports in our schools and colleges are not only ascendant, but greedier and more invulnerable than ever. For prime example, The Chronicle of Higher Education has reported that donations to athletic departments have increased dramatically. College stadiums only become more opulent, so called student-athletes more outrageous.

I'm afraid the game is over. In our American academia, the arts must be satisfied with the leftovers. Just consider the frank words of surrender spoken recently by John V. Lombardi, the president of the Louisiana state university system.

Mega college athletics prospers because for the most part we - our faculty, our staff, our alumni, our trustees - want it. We can easily change it, if most of us wanted to change it. All protestations to the contrary, we do not want to change it.

But Mr. Lombardi is only echoing what a certain Groucho Marx said in the movie "Horse Feathers," when as President Quincy Adams Wagstaff, he asked the faculty: Have we got a stadium? Have we got a college? Well, we can't support both. Tomorrow we start tearing down the college.

That was 75 years ago. It hasn't changed. And I'm sorry, but good people of the arts: it won't.

INSKEEP: This fact isn't changing either, Frank Deford joins us each Wednesday from member station WSHU in Fairfield, Connecticut.

Copyright © 2007 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.