RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:
Time has a way of condensing major historical events into a few key moments, with one-dimensional, legendary figures at the forefront. In his new book, author Todd Andrlik gives life - and depth - to one such event, the American Revolution. He uses newspaper reporting from that era, to provide a sense of the Revolution as it actually unfolded. His book includes eyewitness accounts and battlefield letters - the kind of primary sourcing that is increasingly rare, in our Wikipedia world.
The book is called "Reporting the Revolutionary War: Before It Was History, It Was News." Todd Andrlik joins us in our Washington studios. Thanks for being here.
TODD ANDRLIK: Good to be here, Rachel.
MARTIN: So what drew you to this project?
ANDRLIK: It was love at first sight, it really was. Five years ago, my wife and I took our first family vacation after the birth of our daughter. And we went to Galena, Illinois; this cozy, little - kind of river town, on the Mississippi. And there, on the main street, was a rare bookshop that I just stumbled into; and discovered, in this nondescript kind of container, a newspaper from 1865 that reported the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. And that flipped the switch - holding the historical newspaper in my hand, and reading the first draft of history
MARTIN: So you basically accrued this amazing collection of original newspaper clippings from the time, to retrace the Revolutionary War. Where did you find these things, first of all?
ANDRLIK: Yeah. It's not just newspaper clippings; it's the entire newspapers. These newspapers are not like what we think of today. They're quite different in that they are only four pages in length, and only about 10 by 15 inches tall. So what I did is began the - kind of this quest, finding them from people who had found them in attics, or behind walls of old homes; European book dealers. They're available on the open market, much like fine art - or any other type of historical collectible.
MARTIN: So give us a sense of what the journalism looked like, at that time.
ANDRLIK: It's completely different. For instance, you open up a newspaper, and the first thing that's going to strike you is that there's no headlines. Back then, they used datelines because they were mostly printing news from other newspapers. So today, we have AP and Reuters. Back then, they had a news exchange system where as soon as a printer finished typesetting his edition of the week, he would then send issues to other printers around Colonial America. So if you found a newspaper, and it was a Philadelphia newspaper, and it said Savannah April 14th; chances are, that came from the Georgia Gazette.
MARTIN: So you've brought some of these newspapers with you. Let's take a look at some of these. You can go ahead and grab those.
ANDRLIK: OK, sure.
MARTIN: I mean - we should note, these are very carefully preserved, right?
ANDRLIK: Yes. So these are in an acid-free - kind of mylar, protective folder. And this, here, is the April 21, 1775, New Hampshire Gazette. What's unique about this is that it contains the breaking news of the Battle of Lexington and Concord.
MARTIN: And what did breaking news consist of, back then?
ANDRLIK: Well, breaking news, at that time, was mostly rumor and hearsay.
ANDRLIK: I mean, people were...
MARTIN: And a couple days late.
ANDRLIK: Exactly. So in this case, it's two days after the battle; the messengers had arrived in town. So the newspaper printer took whatever it could and tried to kind of work through what is fact, and what is fiction; and print, in this front-page article, a smorgasbord of what had come in to the print office there.
ANDRLIK: But what's really unique, Rachel, about this particular newspaper - this is only one of two Colonial American newspapers to print the news on its front page. Newspapers, in the 18th century, typically reserved the interior pages for the latest-breaking domestic news because that's what was typeset later in the week, so it could be most current.
ANDRLIK: The other interesting note is that there's a headline here; a centered, two-word headline: "Bloody News." And so that, surely, caught the attention of the colonists reading this newspaper.
MARTIN: You also include some tips, in your book, about how to read these articles, right?
ANDRLIK: Yeah, you have things that you're not used to seeing; such as the Old English S, which looks like an F but better resembles the manuscript S, of the period.
MARTIN: And long sentences.
ANDRLIK: This is before standardized English. So what you see is a lot of run-on sentences. I think I counted once, in a paragraph, there were 40 commas and 22 capital letters.
MARTIN: What did you learn about that time, by spending so many hours rummaging through these articles in these newspapers?
ANDRLIK: I think, for me, it was realizing that there's a lot more than what we gained in our textbooks, in high school and college. The Boston Tea Party - it was not universally celebrated in America. The "shot heard 'round the world" - well, it came very close to happening four months earlier, in New Hampshire. The fact that Paul Revere really wasn't mentioned in the newspapers of the period because they didn't want to kind of let out how they had alerted the countryside - without newspapers, there would have been no Revolution. Newspapers are what fanned the flames of rebellion; they're what sustained loyalty to the cause. And they, ultimately, aided in the outcome of the war.
MARTIN: Todd Andrlik - his new book is called "Reporting the Revolutionary War." He joined us in our studios in Washington. Thanks so much, Todd.
ANDRLIK: Thank you.