MELISSA BLOCK, HOST:
Across the high plains, from the Nebraska to Texas, farmers depend on water from vast underground aquifers to grow their crops. But that pool of water is shrinking, putting entire towns at risk. In one small section of northwestern Kansas, all the farmers have now agreed to pump less water out of the ground.
As NPR's Dan Charles reports, the agreement is unprecedented and fragile.
DAN CHARLES, BYLINE: Hoxie, Kansas is the kind of place where people keep track of how many children go to the town's school. It's a barometer of the town's chances of survival.
MITCHELL BAALMAN: I don't know, when I was in high school, we had 36 to 42 kids in every class.
CHARLES: This is Mitchell Baalman, a farmer, 38 years old.
BAALMAN: Now these classes are down to 15 - probably 10 to 15 in a class.
CHARLES: But things have been turning around lately, Baalman says. There are more kids in the younger grades. There are a few more jobs keeping families around.
(SOUNDBITE OF A VEHICLE)
CHARLES: We're driving down Highway 24 with a semi-trailer filled with 25 tons of corn.
BAALMAN: We'll be taking it to Hoxie feed yard over here, feed 60,000 head of cattle.
CHARLES: Corn and cattle are what bring money into Hoxie. And those businesses are built on water.
BAALMAN: Rain makes grain. I mean, we are in an arid climate. We've been averaging, I think, 18 inches of rain a year.
CHARLES: That's enough rainfall enough to grow a modest corn crop, but not a big one. And sometimes the rains don't come at all. So farmers here pump water from the aquifer. Irrigation rigs called pivots spread it across circles of land half a mile in diameter. Each cornfield like this has been getting about 50 million gallons of water every year.
BAALMAN: We always used to take it for granted that that water was just going to be there. Well, now we're kind of thinking, hey, we're starting to think about these things.
CHARLES: A few years ago, officials in Kansas who monitor the groundwater situation came to the farmers of Hoxie and they said the water table here in your area is falling fast. They drew a line around an area covering 99 square miles, west of town, and called together the farmers in that area, about a hundred of them, for a series of meetings. They told the farmers, if you pump less water it'll stay there. You'll have more, later.
Now, there have been other places on the High Plains where government officials proposed cutbacks in irrigation. And farmers usually treated it like a declaration of war. Ray Luhman, who works for the groundwater management district, that includes Hoxie, says you can understand why.
RAY LUHMAN: Many of them feel like that that water right, or the right to use that water, is their lifeblood.
CHARLES: It's also their property. It's not clear the government can legally tell them to use less of it. But in Hoxie, the conversation took a different turn. Some influential farmers, including Mitchell Baalman, pushed for everybody to pump less water. Baalman talked about his four children, how he wanted to preserve the water for them. And he talked about the town; how much it depended on irrigated agriculture, so it would be better for the town to manage that water to keep it flowing in the future.
BAALMAN: We are wanting to keep people moving back, keep our businesses going and our downtowns, and these little towns, our restaurants.
CHARLES: Last fall, the farmers of Hoxie did something unprecedented. They agreed to pump 20 percent less water over the next five years. The state government then made it a formal requirement. State officials will check the water meters on each pump to make sure it happens.
Scott Foote, who runs Hoxie Feedyard, the biggest business in town, says the key to what happened in Hoxie was the community.
SCOTT FOOTE: It was a lot of neighbors got together that know each other personally, go to church with each other, kids go to school with each other. And honestly, it's just a very tight knit community.
CHARLES: But remember, this agreement is just for five years. It's like a trial period. And the big question is will the farmers stick with this? Mitchell Baalman certainly wants them to.
BAALMAN: I'm going to fight hard that we renew it. I mean, it's my farm, my name at stake. And I don't want to sound selfish like this, but I don't want to let my kids down. We've got a great core of youth in Sheridan County, Thomas County. I don't want to let them down.
CHARLES: But there are farmers who are not quite so sure about this water saving agreement. I found one who's dead set against it.
KEVIN WARK: Well, let's go down the road here a little bit further and I'll show you something about how arbitrary this is.
CHARLES: Kevin Wark lives half an hour from Hoxie. But he has one field just inside the border of the area where you can't pump as much water. And he shows it to me.
WARK: I resent being in this territory. We've been taking basically, roughly 50 percent of the value of the crops we can grow for the next five years away from us. So how's that fair to me, with the guy across the road can just keep doing it, what he's been doing.
CHARLES: Wark says he thought about fighting the restrictions in court. But he decided not to; nobody in Hoxie seemed willing to join him.
Another farmer, Gary Moss, says he supports the agreement for now but he's really waiting to see if farmers in other parts of western Kansas are ready to do something similar. We don't want to be the only ones using less water, he says, it wouldn't be fair.
GARY MOSS: And I think, if nobody else is jumping on board, I think there's a lot people who are going to say, we're not doing any good, we're just hurting ourselves.
CHARLES: So here's the paradox. This agreement to pump less water only happened because it was small, just a conversation among neighbors who cared about their town. But it may not survive unless it gets much bigger, with farmers pumping less water all across the High Plains aquifer.
Dan Charles, NPR News.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.