STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Many college athletes are already hard at work training for the next season. And our commentator Frank Deford is waiting for the day when some get paid.
FRANK DEFORD, BYLINE: There have been two recent developments regarding big-time college athletics. And while both are tremendously significant, the conclusions in both cases were foreshadowed and there don't appear to be any devils in the details. (Laughter) But the big Satan amateurism did take the hardest hit. And understand, most important of all, this is only the beginning. Many more changes in the NCAA and it's synchronistic rules lie ahead.
But first for the record - in what has been known as the O'Bannon case, federal judge Claudia Wilken rules that the NCAA was in violation of anti-trust law and using the images of players in videogames without compensating them. Since payment must come in the form of postgraduate trust funds, this only makes college amateurs a little bit pregnant professionally. But the ruling boldly acknowledges that you cannot withhold payment from entertainments just because they're students. The jig is up. Meanwhile, the NCAA has permitted the five major power conferences - the Atlantic Coast, the Pac 12, the Big 10, the Big 12 and the very, very, very big Southeastern - to henceforth operate under more liberal rules than other Division I schools. Yes, some animals are more equal than others.
These new rights for the power five conferences pretty much only acknowledge reality. The big-timers maintain that they're doing it all for their dear student-athletes, when in fact they're acting primarily in their own self-interest. They should've caught on a long time ago that the unfair amateur system couldn't hold up, not while coaches were making millions and TV was handing out billions and then throwing their players a bone, which is what they're finally doing now. But thank you, it's too late. You see on the near horizon looms an even broader anti-trust case for Judge Wilkin where not only the NCAA, but the power conferences specifically are the defendants. It's being argued for the plaintiffs - both football and basketball players - by a superb sports and labor lawyer named Jeffrey Kessler. The case maintains that athletes are just like other students must be compensated commensurately.
Now, if the judge has already ruled that collegians must be paid for their images, doesn't it follow that they also should share television money and box office receipts for their live performances? On the actual athletic front, football shouldn't be affected. The SEC and it's four littler big-pigs dominate every year anyway. However, basketball's March Madness may be diminished. After all, the current champion UConn is not in one of the power conferences. Can it and other basketball schools still fairly compete? There go all the popular Cinderella's in your brackets. Goodbye Butler, toot-a-loo Florida Gulf Coast. But finally, none of this has anything whatsoever to do with improving education. The concept of the student athlete as a real student is still a joke. But at least now the erstwhile amateurs will have some walking around money.
INSKEEP: He's no amateur. That's Frank Deford, who joins us each Wednesday on MORNING EDITION from NPR News. I'm Steve Inskeep.
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
And I'm David Greene.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.