U.S. Could Drive Down Drug Prices By Exercising Patent Rights : Shots - Health News Some members of Congress say the U.S. government should use the patent rights it owns for any drugs that were developed with federal grants to drive down the prices of those drugs.
NPR logo

One Way To Force Down Drug Prices: Have The U.S. Exercise Its Patent Rights

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/520390026/520440825" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
One Way To Force Down Drug Prices: Have The U.S. Exercise Its Patent Rights

One Way To Force Down Drug Prices: Have The U.S. Exercise Its Patent Rights

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/520390026/520440825" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

The Republican plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, doesn't have a measure to lower drug prices, but President Trump has called for major changes repeatedly.

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

Just last week, he tweeted, I am working on a new system where there will be competition in the drug industry. Pricing for the American people will come way down.

CORNISH: We haven't seen any details from the Trump administration, but several ideas are floating around. Today and tomorrow, NPR health policy correspondent Alison Kodjak will take a closer look at two of them. And she starts today with the so-called march-in right which allows the government to step in and control a drug's production.

ALISON KODJAK, BYLINE: March-in rights are spelled out in federal law. Essentially they give the government a license to use the intellectual property, the patents that come from government-funded medical research. Congressman Lloyd Doggett, a Texas democrat, wants the U.S. to exercise those rights to force down drug prices.

LLOYD DOGGETT: I believe that when taxpayers finance research that produces a pharmaceutical, they have an interest in being able to afford that pharmaceutical. And that's not happening now.

KODJAK: What is happening now is that the government, through agencies like the National Institutes of Health, pays for medical research at private companies and universities. When those outside organizations come up with an invention to patent, they have to give the government a license to use the invention. The idea is to ensure that the medications that result are available to the public on, quote, "reasonable terms." Doggett says that's not happening.

DOGGETT: Millions of dollars go out in federal research dollars. Pharmaceuticals result, and then they get priced at such outrageous levels, far more than are charged to the people who didn't pay for the research in other countries. And they're so high that some people cannot afford them.

KODJAK: Last year, Doggett asked the Department of Health and Human Services to use its march-in authority to lower the price of a prostate cancer drug. The agency under former President Obama refused. Then he asked it to just hold some hearings and lay out some guidelines for when it might consider exercising march-in rights in response to price gouging. Again, the agency refused.

DOGGETT: The attitude there seems to be, we're not in the pricing business; we're only in the research business, and we're not too interested in getting into the pricing business.

KODJAK: The question is whether selling a drug developed with federal money at a really high price violates the requirement that it be available to the public. Aaron Kesselheim, a professor at Harvard Medical School, thinks it does.

AARON KESSELHEIM: When you think of the phrase reasonable terms, reasonable terms inherently means I think the - you know, the price that a drug is available for.

KODJAK: He says the government could use its license to contract with another supplier to make the drugs at a lower price, or it could potentially take the license and buy the medications from a foreign manufacturer. A radical move like that could have an effect on drug prices across the board. Here's Sara Fisher Ellison, an economist at MIT.

SARA FISHER ELLISON: Definitely an unusual action like that could have spillover effects on the drug prices of other companies because obviously they might see themselves as the next potential target and might want to sort of make themselves a less attractive target by lowering their prices.

KODJAK: But those lower prices could also make drug companies less eager to invest lots of money in new medications.

FISHER ELLISON: That's a trade-off. That's a trade-off that, you know, has existed forever and will continue to exist.

KODJAK: But it's a trade-off Trump could very well decide is worthwhile.

FISHER ELLISON: Perhaps we as a country would rather have lower drug prices and a little less innovation.

KODJAK: Congressman Doggett hopes Trump might just take that deal.

DOGGETT: This is something where President Trump, if he wants to fulfill a campaign promise, can take action that the last administration refused to take in order to protect consumers.

KODJAK: Alison Kodjak, NPR News, Washington.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.