ROBERT SIEGEL, host:
This is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. I'm Robert Siegel.
In Saddam Hussein's Iraq, the court system was a weapon wielded by a brutal regime. Saddam drummed up charges against political rivals, and he intimidated judges into doing his bidding.
Well, five years after the U.S. invasion, NPR's Dina Temple-Raston reports that not much has changed, and the abuse of some laws has actually gotten worse.
DINA TEMPLE-RASTON: Iraq's secular legal system is based largely on the continental European model. In Iraq, judges are both prosecutor and magistrate. They conduct a criminal investigation before referring the case to a panel of three trial judges, who essentially weigh the evidence and then issue a sentence.
On trial days, spectators mill outside the courtroom. Inside, there's the judge's bench and a rail docket for defendants, but there's little else that suggest justice as we know it.
In a recent human rights report, the U.N. worried aloud that Iraqi defendants have no timely access to counsel. They rarely get to examine the evidence against them, have no opportunity to cross examine witnesses or produce exculpatory evidence, and in one case, it took a panel of judges just 50 minutes to hear all the evidence against two defendants and make their ruling: life in prison.
William Gallo is the director of the U.S. Army's Law and Order Task Force, which is trying to help Iraq develop a rule of law.
Mr. WILLIAM GALLO (Director, U.S. Army Law and Order Task Force): We have a kind of fledgling judicial system that's sort of growing and feeling its way through the dark, and things may change in time.
TEMPLE-RASTON: The caseload hardly provides time for contemplation. One of the central criminal courts in Baghdad handled nearly 24,000 cases last year. A little over half of those cases were dismissed, and almost 7,500 of them went to trial. And that's just one court in Iraq.
Judge Faiq Zaidan is the chief investigative judge at the court. To American television viewers, he would look more like a beat cop than a judge. He's beafy and has close-cropped hair and a pencil moustache, and he's partial to shiny pastel-colored ties. He says he can understand why Iraqis think the justice system is broken.
Judge FAIQ ZAIDAN (Chief Investigative Judge, Baghdad Central Criminal Court): (Through translator) This is something that will require time. It is a challenging issue. As you know, we have moved from a dictator's regime to a democratic regime. Black cannot turn overnight into white. We are in a gray area.
TEMPLE-RASTON: One particularly gray area that rankles ordinary Iraqis has been the inability of the system to bring charges against high-ranking Iraqi officials. Increasingly, they've hidden behind a law known as 136B - a 1971 addition to the criminal code that was originally intended to protect low-level officials, such as police officers, from criminal prosecution. High-ranking officials are using it now to get away with sectarian crimes and rampant corruption.
Basically, the rule requires investigators to get ministerial permission to investigate someone who works for the ministry. A refusal means investigations can't move forward.
Kalil Hashim, a prosecutor at the Central Criminal Court, says the rule is frustrating.
Mr. KALIL HASHIM (Prosecutor, Central Criminal Court): (Through translator) There had been previous cases of 136B protecting high-ranking officials during the Saddam era, but they were rare. Now, it is happening all the time.
TEMPLE-RASTON: Consider the case of General Mehdi al-Gharwari, a former high-ranking Interior Ministry official. Iraqi prosecutors suspect he was one of the masterminds behind an infamous prison in the basement of one of the ministry's buildings known as Site 4.
During the sectarian violence of 2005 and 2006, hundreds of mostly Sunni detainees were tortured there. Before investigators could formally bring charges against the general, the current minister of the interior invoked 136B. The general is now dividing his time between the Green Zone and Cairo -untouchable, a free man. Judge Faiq says he has been campaigning against the law for years.
Judge ZAIDAN: (Through translator) Even during the Saddam era, I asked it be taken out. The problem is that the article politicizes the law. It gives ministers a judicial role. Ministers get to decide who becomes the one who goes free and who is innocent. It is a disaster.
TEMPLE-RASTON: Faiq says the rule ends up casting doubt over the entire judicial system in Iraq.
Judge ZAIDAN: (Through translator) Ministers are using this to protect criminals. This, I would say, is a ticking time bomb.
TEMPLE-RASTON: According to U.S. officials, 136B has derailed corruption cases at 11 ministries and the government's Central Bank. The U.S. Embassy has been pushing the Iraqi government to roll it back, but both American and Iraqi officials say privately they can't see that happening because that would open the current government to investigation as well.
Dina Temple-Raston, NPR News, Baghdad.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.