Alito Wrote Abortion Isn't a Protected Right The U.S. Department of Justice released more papers that shed new light on how Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito may rule on abortion cases in the future.


Alito Wrote Abortion Isn't a Protected Right

Alito Wrote Abortion Isn't a Protected Right

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

Documents from Samuel Alito's 30-year career are now being plumbed for clues to his views on abortion. Corbis hide caption

toggle caption

Documents released Monday shed new light on how Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito may rule on abortion cases in the future.

Among some 200 pages made available by the Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush Presidential Libraries is a 1985 job application in which Alito makes his case for a position in the office of then-U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese. At the time, Meese was pushing for a wholesale reevaluation of government legal policy along conservative lines.


Read Samuel Alito's views on abortion in a 1985 job application:

"I am and always have been a conservative and an adherent to the same philosophical views that I believe are central to this Administration," Alito wrote on the application's personal qualifications statement. "I am particularly proud of my contributions in recent cases in which the government has argued in the Supreme Court that racial and ethnic quotas should not be allowed, and that the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion."

At the time, Alito had spent his entire career as a government attorney, and was trying to land his first position as a political appointee. As such, it was in his best interests to portray himself as a staunch conservative — just as it is now in his best interests to portray himself as someone who is not an ideologue.

The new documents are hardly a revelation. Soon after Alito was nominated, his mother told reporters that "of course" her son opposes abortion. As a judge on the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, Alito voted in favor of part of a law that would have required wives to notify their husbands before getting an abortion. The Supreme Court later disagreed with him — in the case of Planned Parenthood vs. Casey, the 1992 case that reaffirmed the validity of the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion.

Most senators — liberal and conservative — believe that Alito personally objects to abortion. But the question remains as to whether he would overturn Roe v. Wade. At the center of that debate is whether Alito views the Roe decision as "settled law." The case has been upheld repeatedly over the past three decades since it was decided in 1973. Even if Alito would have personally decided the case differently had he been on the court back then, his respect for precedent — or what's known in legal circles as "stare decisis" — is a factor to consider when trying to forecast how he would rule on abortion cases as a Supreme Court Justice. In fact, Alito has said in private meetings with Democratic senators that Roe "deserved great respect."

That said, stare decisis is not absolute, and there are reasons to overturn cases even if they are settled law, as Chief Justice John Roberts made a point of mentioning at his confirmation hearings in September.

Roberts himself wrote many controversial government documents during his career. But during his confirmation hearings, he successfully made the case that they were the views of his employer at the time, not his own.

That argument won't fly with this letter, however, because Alito writes in the letter itself that these are legal positions in which he personally believes very strongly. Still, he can likely defend himself against other documents he may have written as a government lawyer with the explanation that he was writing on behalf of his client.