How We Pay Attention Can you remember everything you see when you walk into a room? Why does our memory deceive us, even when we're confident we're paying attention? Psychologists Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons discuss what grabs our focus, and why.

How We Pay Attention

How We Pay Attention

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

Can you remember everything you see when you walk into a room? Why does our memory deceive us, even when we're confident we're paying attention? Psychologists Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons discuss what grabs our focus, and why.


Up next, when you walk into a room, do you notice everything in it? Do you pay attention to the stapler sitting on the desk in the corner, or the color the carpet is? What about when you're driving? How aware are you about the traffic, the pedestrians around you, the road rage that you might be getting into?

Do we pay so much attention to one thing that we completely miss something else going on right in front of us? Do we think we're great at multitasking when we're really not?

My guests have written about these things in their book, "The Invisible Gorilla," and if you haven't already, I want you to go over to our website and check out the video that's up there. You can do it later if you like, when you get home from driving. I don't want you to do it in the car now.

You can take the test for your attention yourself. There's a very famous, little test and a follow-up test there that I'd like you to take, right on our website at Also, you can tweet us, @scifri, or phone us, 1-800-989-8255.

Let me introduce my guests. Christopher Chabris is assistant professor of psychology at Union College in Schenectady, New York. Welcome to SCIENCE FRIDAY, Dr. Chabris.

Dr. CHRISTOPHER CHABRIS (Co-author, "The Invisible Gorilla"; Assistant Professor of Psychology, Union College): Thanks for having me.

FLATOW: You're welcome. Daniel Simmons - Simons is professor of psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in Urbana, Illinois. Welcome to SCIENCE FRIDAY, Dr. Simons.

Dr. Daniel Simons (Co-author, "The Invisible Gorilla;" Professor of Psychology, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign): Thanks for having me on.

FLATOW: Let's talk about "The Invisible Gorilla." Now, I think I gave away what the test is all about. But it is a famous test, and we've seen it around the Internet. It's where - it tests your attention span and what you actually miss that's going on in front of you.

Dr. SIMONS: Sure. So this is a study that we did about 12 years ago, and it's based on some earlier work by our colleague Ulric Neisser, but it extends it in an important way.

The task is very simple. All you have to do is watch a video of people passing a basketball, and count how many times the players wearing white pass the ball.

And as you're doing this, in the middle of the video, we have a person wearing a full-body gorilla suit walk into the scene, turn and face the camera, thump its chest at the camera, and then walk off the other side - a total of nine seconds later.

And what we find is that half the people we show this to just don't notice the gorilla, and if you ask them about it, they say, I missed what? You show it to them again, they'll sometimes accuse us of switching the tape.

FLATOW: And then there's a follow-up to it, which you did also.

Dr. SIMONS: Yeah, so I won't give away that one. That one will still work on you after what I just talked about.

FLATOW: Right, you'll get to see whether you see the gorilla again. So how is that we pay attention? What does it mean? Why are we distracted? I think a magician might call this something else, you know - sleight of hand, misdirection. He wants you to look at one thing, and you look at something else. What does this show us, that we're not good at taking in everything in the whole scene?

Dr. CHABRIS: Well, it shows us a couple of things. One is that we actually are very good at paying attention to things, and the fact that we can follow a ball flying around a video at high speed, and actually count the number of times people touch it, is a remarkable cognitive ability that our brains are capable of.

But on the other hand, when we're devoting our attention to that task, the experiment shows that we can completely miss extremely salient things that happen right in front of us.

And incidentally, other research by other laboratories found that some people who missed the gorilla in that original video actually had their eyes looking right at it for up to a full second, and still did not see it.

So looking and seeing are not the same thing. And attention is a great thing, but it doesn't necessarily spread over the entire visual field - or everything you want to do.

FLATOW: All right. We're going to take a short break while you go watch the gorilla video on our website, at We're going to take a break and come back and talk lots more with Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons, authors of "The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways our Intuitions Deceive Us;" 1-800-989-8255 is our number. Don't go away. We'll be right back.

(Soundbite of music)

FLATOW: You're listening to SCIENCE FRIDAY. I'm Ira Flatow. We're talking this hour about how our brains pay attention, with my guests, Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons, author of "The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways our Intuitions Deceive Us."

FLATOW: Let's talk about multitasking is everywhere in the news because people are doing - they're doing - they're tweeting at same time they're typing. They're listening to our show on the radio. They're driving. Is it a fallacy that we're able to multitask? And which one of you want to take that?

Dr. CHABRIS: It's a fallacy that we're able to multitask and do two or three or four or five things at once, just as well as we could do them if we did them one at a time.

The problem is that we don't really get the sense of how badly we're performing these multiple tasks at once, and we think we're doing them just fine.

This is, for example, one of the reasons why some people talk on the cell phone while they're driving - because they don't get the sense that they're driving less well than they actually are. They don't get the sense that they're missing unexpected things because, of course, they don't see what they're missing.

And that's part of the power of the gorilla experiment, actually, is it sort of shows you vividly what you're missing when you're focused on one task. And it gives people an insight that they don't necessarily get in everyday life - when they're multitasking around and don't notice the mistakes they're making, or the errors they might be making.

FLATOW: Daniel, have anything to add to that?

Dr. SIMONS: Yeah, I was going to say one of the other interesting aspects of this is that people often don't really know what they mean by multitasking. So there are different forms of multitasking.

You can have a whole bunch of things to do and be thinking about all of them and switching among them, doing one at a time, and that's very different from trying to do two things at exactly the same time.

So you can think about this like trying to talk and chew gum and whistle at the same time. You can't do all three because your mouth is necessary for all of them and in different ways.

Well, the same's true of our mind. If you're trying to do two things at the same time that require the same cognitive skill or ability, you just can't do both at the same time as well.

FLATOW: How good are we at paying attention to any one thing? Are we designed to do that or - because, you know, we have all this peripheral vision that we're always on the lookout for something else, the jungle mentality, coming out of that jungle.

Dr. SIMONS: Well, I think there's probably a range of individual differences in how well people can stay focused on one thing. But it does seem that our attention system, the way our mind works, is designed to help us focus on one thing, and to filter out things that we don't care about.

It's just, the side consequence of that is we sometimes filter out things that we might care about if we knew they were there.

FLATOW: Is there any one way to get you to focus better, any situation you should put yourself in? One kind of thing I have seen in this generation, meaning the last 20 years - it's certainly true of my kids - they say they focus better with music, while listening to music or doing their homework, which was, you know, absolutely the opposite - my parents would never let me have the TV on or listen to music. But is there any truth to that claim that they can focus better with that kind of distraction?

Dr. CHABRIS: As far as I'm aware, there is no truth to that claim.

(Soundbite of laughter)

Dr. CHABRIS: However, I'm not surprised that kids would make the claim that they can focus on lots of things at once, and that music helps them and that the TV in the background doesn't distract them and so on - because there's something about the way our minds are constructed, you know, teenage minds, adult minds, whatever, that keeps us somewhat out of touch with how well we're performing tasks on a moment-by-moment basis. And we very easily convince ourselves we're doing things well and that certain conditions are good for performance when in fact, we don't have a lot of insight into how well we're doing things.

This leads to phenomena like overconfidence. We don't really know how well we're doing various things. So it's not surprising that people would say, oh, yeah, I can do things really well with all the stimuli I like coming at me all the time.

FLATOW: But what about soothing, classical music in the background? I mean, I know you worked with the Mozart Effect. Tell us about that.

Dr. CHABRIS: Well, the idea of the Mozart Effect, which came on the scene in the early 1990s, didn't have so much to do with background music - although people may have took it that way. It had to do with listening to classical music, specifically Mozart's music, right before taking a test.

And the claim was that if you listen to 10 minutes of Mozart's music and then took an IQ test, you would score nine points higher, and that's really a lot in IQ-test terms. That's like going from like, you know, a C student to a B-plus, or something like that. Wow, 10 minutes of Mozart's music, that's all it takes.

It turns out that many people tried to reproduce that same effect and failed, and there probably is no Mozart Effect. Or, it's just an artifact of you hear music you like, it puts you in a slightly better mood, and it's good to be in a good mood when you take a test. You don't want to be in a bad mood when you're taking a test - no evidence that it really sort of fundamentally changes the brain or re-organizes the way your neurons work, or anything fancy like that.

FLATOW: Talking with the authors of "The Invisible Gorilla," and let's go to the phones, to Michael(ph) in San Antonio. Hi, Mike.

MICHAEL (Caller): Good afternoon, gentlemen.

FLATOW: Hi there.

MICHAEL: I'm a police captain, and when I was an instructor at the academy, of course you want police officers to be very aware of everything that's going on around them. And we used to use the gorilla test for our cadets the very first week of training.

And they were always shocked and amazed at how little they were able to see when someone else came into the room to speak to the instructor. For maybe 30, 60 seconds, the individual left the room, and then the instructor would turn to the class, start asking questions about identifying the person that just left the room.

And in most cases, well over 90 percent of the class couldn't tell you what color hair he had, whether he was 6-foot tall or 4-foot tall. And it really comes as a shock to them - for them to realize how little they were aware of the individual. And it kind of shocks them into a situation where they become hypersensitive, after that class, of everything that's going on around them.

FLATOW: Gentlemen, do you have a comment?

Dr. SIMONS: Yeah, this is Dan. I think it's fantastic that you're using this sort of video, and this sort of demonstration, for that purpose. And I think you've tapped into exactly what's interesting about this sort of effect, which is that it's counterintuitive.

When you realize what you've just missed, it's jarring because it forces you to confront the fact that you actually aren't noticing everything. And that's particularly true for professions like police work, where the people who are going into police work kind of pride themselves on being attentive and noticing and looking very carefully, and being able to spot everything.

And the reality is, nobody can. It's just a limit of how our minds work.

FLATOW: What about the eyewitnesses, who supposedly can remember what happened at the scene?

Dr. SIMONS: Well, that's the real danger - that we tend to assume that we're going to see things and remember them accurately, and that when we recall those details, that they're just as accurate as if we were replaying the event for ourselves like a videotape.

FLATOW: Michael, did you do the second part of the test on our website today?

MICHAEL: Yes, yes - we do.

FLATOW: Don't give it away. Did you notice the difference?

MICHAEL: Okay. I did.

(Soundbite of laughter)

Dr. SIMONS: You're among the rare few.

MICHAEL: I was looking for something, and I knew it had to be there. So I was probably more attentive than your average individual.

FLATOW: Do you find with your officers that you can train them to be more attentive after they see that test?

MICHAEL: Oh, absolutely, yeah. And we find that they practice it, especially during their time at the academy. We're talking about a 16-week course and of course, every once in a while, you know, you give a little surprise test based on their acuity.

Yeah, each and every one of them, when questioned individually, you can see an improvement from week to week because they are very much paying attention, where they hadn't been before.

FLATOW: Well, thank you very much for calling, Captain. Have a good weekend.

MICHAEL: My pleasure.

FLATOW: Bye-bye.

Dr. SIMONS: That's a really interesting point. There's actually surprisingly little evidence that you can train these abilities to the point that you can actually notice everything.

What you can do - and that's likely what's going on in this sort of training - is, you can train people to look for particular kinds of things.

So script supervisors, the people who work on movie sets, know how to look for particular kinds of mistakes that might end up into a movie that would be noticed. And they look for specifically those - and they ignore the other stuff that's never going to matter, or the stuff that's never going to end up across a cut.

What they know, that most people don't, is that their memory is lousy, that they can't rely on their memory. And they know to take all sorts of notes and keep careful track of the things that are likely to matter.

FLATOW: Let's see if we can get one more question, from Ray(ph) in Sacramento. Hi, Ray.

RAY (Caller): Hi, I was going to ask you to speak about the small number of people who actually can pass the test consistently.

FLATOW: Yeah, that's a good question, Dan?

Dr. SIMONS: Let's let Chris do that one.

FLATOW: Okay, Chris?

Dr. CHABRIS: If you mean the small number of people who actually notice the gorilla, it turns out - as far as we've been able to figure out, and Dan has done research on this and so have others - there is no thing that predicts consistently who is going to notice, and who isn't going to notice.

That's one of the most common questions that we get after people see this video -is, if they notice, they say, well, what does that say about me? Or if their brother didn't notice, then they say, well, am I smarter than him or something? And the answer is, as far as we can tell, no.

It's circumstance and chance, and the particular environment and background, and what's going on in your head when you see it.

It's not an intelligence test. It's not that much of a personality test, and we don't believe that there are people who consistently always notice these things. It's basically a feature of the human mind that we all share, and we might miss this stuff at any given point.

FLATOW: So is there a general overall theme or message of your research - or your book, "The Invisible Gorilla"?

Dr. SIMONS: Yeah, I think the overall theme of our book is that the intuitions we have about the workings of our mind, they're based on our experiences. They're based on our day-to-day experience of the world. But that day-to-day experience of the world, and of our own minds, is misleading. And it can lead us to conclusions about how our minds work that isn't right.

So if you're multitasking, you don't realize how distracted you are. You don't realize the impact it has on you. If you're driving and talking on the cell phone, you don't realize how distracted you are. And that applies to memory and confidence and reasoning, and our beliefs about how we think and decide.

FLATOW: Interesting book, gentlemen. I want to thank you for taking time to be with us today.

Dr. CHABRIS: Thanks for having us.

FLATOW: Good read, "The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us." Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons, thanks again.

Dr. SIMONS: Thanks.

Copyright © 2010 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.