Europeans Concur: Not Pulling Our Weight In NATO
STEVE INSKEEP, Host:
Our colleague Philip Reeves in London has been asking of what Europeans make of what's happening to the North Atlantic Alliance.
PHILIP REEVES: Ask experts here if Europe is pulling its weight in NATO, and you'll likely get the same reply. U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates is quite right, they'll say. Europe's obviously not shouldering its share.
CHRIS BELLAMY: Mr. Gates was citing reality. The Americans are getting fed up with carrying the defense and security burden for the rest of the Western world.
REEVES: Sarwar Kashmeri, an expert on U.S.-European relations, says the Libya operation is making that clear.
SARWAR KASHMERI: Because of the headlines, because of the coverage, a lot of people realize what the insiders knew, which was that the emperor not just doesn't have any clothes but doesn't have anything under the clothes.
REEVES: Kashmeri says the Libyan conflict has exposed all sorts of flaws, including a lack of technological coordination.
KASHMERI: And it was very perplexing for a lot of people to find out that when the countries of NATO, who are acting in Libya, ran out of laser-guided bombs, America had thousands of them in the aircraft carriers but they couldn't be used because they wouldn't fit on the French and British aircraft.
REEVES: Kashmeri doesn't agree that NATO's European members must invest more on defense. He says they already shell out $300 billion a year. It's a question of being far more efficient, and the only way to make that happen is for the U.S. to cut funding.
KASHMERI: Once the Europeans are faced with the prospect of not being able to defend themselves, versus having the luxury of all these inefficiencies, they will make the decision to defend themselves. I mean they've done that over the centuries, so why shouldn't they do that now?
REEVES: Some believe NATO's problems are more fundamental. Constanze Stelzenmuller, of the German Marshall Fund in Berlin, says the U.S. and Europeans are failing to acknowledge the alliance has a new role of collective risk management. As Libya illustrates, there'll inevitably be disagreements within the alliance over what constitutes a risk. NATO urgently needs to learn how to handle that, she says.
CONSTANZE STELZENMULLER: It's not the end of the alliance if we have legitimate disagreements. It is the end of the alliance, or it will I think create considerable damage if we let those disagreements fester.
REEVES: Stelzenmuller says the Libya intervention has revealed deep flaws in Europe's decision-making processes.
STELZENMULLER: They're ponderous. They produce lowest common denominator results. And while I think it's normal that we have divisions, we seem to be almost unable to then come together and try to hammer them out.
REEVES: Chris Bellamy, again.
BELLAMY: My view of the future would be that the European Joint Defense should move to the European Union. And that the Americans should withdraw to some extent and NATO would naturally disappear.
REEVES: Look at NATO's structure, he says. You have the technologically advanced all-powerful Americans taking the lead, supported by several European heavyweights like Britain and France. There are some smaller players - Denmark and Norway, and so on - then some ill-equipped Eastern European minnows that get a lot out of NATO, but put nothing in.
BELLAMY: So we've got, you know, at least four levels within NATO. And if you have a structure like that, inevitably it's going to disintegrate over time.
REEVES: Philip Reeves, NPR News, London.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
INSKEEP: It's MORNING EDITION from NPR News.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.