Everyone's Likely To Be Sad At This Year's Hugos The Hugo Awards celebrate the best in science fiction and fantasy, but this year they're fraught with controversy after a self-identified conservative coalition organized to dominate the nominations.

Everyone's Likely To Be Sad At This Year's Hugos

World Science Fiction Society
The Hugo Award
World Science Fiction Society

The annual World Science Fiction Convention is happening now in Spokane, Wash., packed with the usual discussion panels, author readings and autograph sessions. In most ways, it's like any other WorldCon — five days of mingling between fans and creators of genre-related media from novels to paintings to music to podcasts. WorldCon has been held nearly every year since 1939 (World War II necessitated a break), rotating through different cities around the globe. Like any fan-driven convention, it's meant as a getaway, a chance for participants to hobnob with likeminded people in a friendly environment.

But this year is unusual. This is the year the politics got ugly at WorldCon. And no matter what happens this weekend, it's likely to leave a lot of people frustrated and unsatisfied, whether they're at the convention or not. This is the year the Puppies took over.

The Sad Puppies saga may not make sense to people who don't spend a lot of time on the Internet, tracking the ideological fights that go on at the heart of every fandom. In any field of interest that drives desperate devotion — academia, sports, modern-day medieval costuming — people online stake out what they love about their favorite hobbies, then get frothingly angry at other people who like the same thing, but in a different way, or for a different reason. The Puppies are one such group: A small Gamergate-aligned coalition who feel the Hugos, the annual science-fiction and fantasy awards voted on by people with WorldCon memberships, are becoming too liberal, leftist and inclusive. The coalition argues that conservative, straight, white (and mostly male) writers are being shut out by "affirmative action" voting. So for three years running, they've mounted a campaign to take over the Hugos and fill the ballot with their preferred brand of nominees. This is the year they succeeded.

Who did it, how they did it, why they did it, and what can be done about it have all been written about at great length. Endless interested parties have weighed in, from fan-favorite authors like Connie Willis, John Scalzi and Game Of Thrones' George R.R. Martin to news sites from Slate and Salon to National Review. What nobody knows yet, though, is what will happen tonight, when the Hugo winners are announced. Once the Puppy group dominated the finalist ballot, voters were left with few options except to accept the Puppy choices, ignore this year's Hugos or protest by voting "No Award" in most categories. It's unlikely, but always possible, that this could be the year nobody wins a Hugo.

To most of the world, none of this matters. The Hugos are billed as the most prestigious awards in SF/F fandom, the awards that come from the fans themselves. But they've always had a small voting base, which is how the Puppy coalition was able to game them. If no podcast, fan artist, or short story is named 2015's best, most people won't notice.

But it matters to the fans, because con-going fandom is an insular, protective world. (The habit of calling non-fans "mundanes" goes back many decades, and carries the same sort of pitying dismissal as the word "Muggles" in J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter novels.) And many con-goers feel like outsiders have invaded their refuge to push a narrow political agenda.

And it matters to the nominees, including some deserving creators who stand to have any victory tainted by the furious rift going on in SF fandom right now. (A couple of nominees have withdrawn from the competition rather than face that prospect.) It matters to the WorldCon organizers, who have to figure out whether and how to change the voting system. It matters to everyone who follows the field, and wonders how this will affect controversy-shy editors and publishers looking for the next hit book or story, not the next online grudge match.

What's going on with WorldCon is nothing new; the Hugos are just the latest battleground in the increasingly polarized, extremist world of Internet disputes. But it feels particularly ugly given that the fight has spread into a field that both sides say should be driven by fun, escapism and hope for the future, not mired in present politics. No matter how tonight comes out, it's likely to leave everyone involved as sad puppies.

The Hugo awards ceremony will take place at 8 p.m. PT, and will stream live online.

Tasha Robinson is a freelance writer and a former Senior Editor at The Dissolve and The A.V. Club.