February 1, 2007
Leah Yoon, NPR




Washington, DC; February 1, 2007 – In an interview with NPR’s Steve Inskeep that aired today on NPR News Morning Edition, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns, addressed the diplomatic challenges in protecting U.S. interests in the Middle East. Undersecretary Burns discusses the ambiguous relations among the U.S., Iran and Iraq, saying “Iran is seeking a position of dominance in the Middle East. It’s very clear. Iran has a regional agenda which is very much at odds with that of the United States.”

A rushed transcript of the interview with Undersecretary Burns, which aired this morning, Thursday, February 1, on NPR News Morning Edition is below. Excerpts must be credited to NPR News Morning Edition. The audio is available now at http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7107364.

Morning Edition is public radio's most listened-to program with nearly 13 million weekly listeners. The two-hour program, now in its third decade, airs weekdays and is hosted by Steve Inskeep in Washington, D.C. and Renée Montagne from NPR West in Culver City, Calif.


STEVE INSKEEP: Have you linked Iranian involvement to a specific incident or operation?

NICHOLAS BURNS: Well, we’ve been tracking this for about two years, and there’s been increased evidence over that time that Iran has given this kind of assistance to the Shi’a insurgency groups. In southern Iraq, they’ve attacked British soldiers near Basra, and they’ve now begun to mount those operations throughout the country, at least in the Baghdad region as well. And so we’re very concerned about it.

Now we warned Iran privately on a number of occasions over the last year and a half, and the Iranians of course did not appear to listen to that, so now we’ve begun to detain those Iranian officials. And we think it’s absolutely within our rights to do so under Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, which is self-defense. Iran should not seek this type of role in Iraq. It should try to become a force for unity in Iraq itself, but it’s not choosing that path right now.

MR. INSKEEP: There’s been much interest in a particular incident in recent days near the city of Karbala, where a number of insurgents in U.S. military uniforms – or what looked like them anyway – got past a number of checkpoints and were involved in a gunfight in which a number of Americans were killed. Do you believe Iran had a role in that specific incident?

MR. BURNS: That was a despicable event, and we did lose five young Americans in that attack. We don’t know who was responsible; that’s under investigation.

MR. INSKEEP: Are you looking at Iran?

MR. BURNS: You know, Steve, it’s hard to say. I don’t want to say anything that would be inaccurate, and obviously we’re looking at all sources, and we’ll try to find those who are responsible and hold them accountable. But right now it’s not possible to say exactly who those people were.

But the larger point is this: Iran is seeking a position of dominance in the Middle East. It’s very clear. Iran has a regional agenda which is very much at odds with that of the United States.

MR. INSKEEP: Mr. Burns, you mentioned that the United States has the right of self-defense here. Does that right of self-defense give the United States the right to strike targets within Iran in response to this, should the president choose to do so?

MR. BURNS: Well, the president has said – and others have said – that we don’t intend to strike into Iran itself. We are concerned with our obligations and our interests within Iraq. As you know, American military forces are in Iraq under a United Nations resolution, so we have every right to be there. We’re there at the invitation of the Iraqi government.

The Iranian paramilitary and intelligence forces, who we believe are in Iraq, are not there under U.N. authorization or at the invitation of the Iraqi government, so there’s a clear legal and, I would say, political and moral difference between what the United States is doing, which is to try to unify Iraq and bring the country to a greater measure of stability, and what the Iranians are doing.

MR. INSKEEP: I just want to clarify something here. President Bush, in an interview with NPR earlier this week, said that the United States did not intend to invade Iran. Are you saying the United States does not intend to strike Iran in any way – which I suppose would say you don’t intend an air strike or any other kind of military operation?

MR. BURNS: Well, you know, we have said for a number of years that all options are on the table concerning Iran. But we’ve also said very clearly – and we’ve followed this very assiduously – that we’re on a diplomatic path. We believe it can be resolved by diplomatic means.

MR. INSKEEP: But I want to understand which of those statements is operative: you don’t intend to invade or you don’t intend to strike, given this particular –

MR. BURNS: We’ve been very clear we don’t intend to cross the border into Iran, we don’t intend to strike into Iran, in terms of what we are doing in Iraq.

MR. INSKEEP: In terms of what you’re doing in Iraq.

MR. BURNS: Exactly.

MR. INSKEEP: All options may be on the table with other issues like Iran’s nuclear program.

MR. BURNS: Well, that’s been American policy for many, many years. In fact, that predates the Bush administration.

MR. INSKEEP: Mr. Burns, one other question. On this program we heard from a professor Ali Ansari, director of the Institute of Iranian Studies at Scotland’s St. Andrews University. He was talking about the consequences of this confrontation and he said – this is a quote – “By raising the tension and by raising the level of armed forces in the region, even if both sides are not interested in military conflict, you’re increasing the likelihood that an accidental escalation is going to take place.” Is there any truth in that?

MR. BURNS: I would see it differently. I don’t believe that a military conflict with Iran is inevitable. I think that if we’re patient and we’re skillful, we can have a diplomatic solution to these problems. We are trying for that diplomatic solution. But it’s not reasonable to suggest that because the United States has put carrier battle groups into the Gulf, we are being provocative. You know, we’ve defended Gulf security for six decades. Our carriers have been there throughout that time.

So it’s not us who are being provocative or raising the stakes here. We’re simply trying to protect our interests in Iraq, the security of the Gulf Arab states, and of the wider Middle East. And this has been the American position now through many administrations, and the Iranians need to understand, they can’t come barging into a situation and express what they want and seek a position of dominance without some kind of reaction from the moderate Arab states and from the United States. We’re trying to convince the Iranians that it’s in their best interest to sit down and talk with the United States. That is the basis of American policy.

MR. INSKEEP: Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, thanks very much for speaking with us.

MR. BURNS: Thank you, Steve.