'Pictures By Women': A Too-Ambitious Exhibition? : The Picture Show The title of a new exhibition promises an interesting show. But do the photographs stand up?

'Pictures By Women': A Too-Ambitious Exhibition?

There's a new exhibition on New York City's radar: "Pictures by Women: A History of Modern Photography" at the Museum of Modern Art. And as a female photo-phile, I was excited by the prospect.

Granted, I have the misfortune of being in another city, so I have not yet been to see it in person. But with a title like "A History of Modern Photography" and a sponsor like the MOMA, I have high expectations. I'd hope to see an impressive representation of the female contribution to the medium. Unfortunately, if the few press photos are any representation of the show on the whole, I'd have to say: I'm disappointed.

The Cindy Sherman photo, for example, is hardly representative of her enormous contribution to the medium. The somewhat one-dimensional portrait by Lucia Moholy doesn't even begin to describe her rich portfolio. And I can't help but think: if it doesn't excite me, whom will it excite?

To be fair, the exhibition was put together from MOMA's holdings. No museum can have the best prints from every photographer spanning a century. I mean, maybe my disappoinment stems from the fact that women, on the whole, just haven't been as prominent in photography as men. And if that's the case, then MOMA is not to blame.

In any case, I look forward to visiting the exhibition and being proved wrong. I don't know, New York. What do you think?