New Problem For Christie: Audit Of Sandy-Related Spending : The Two-WayThe New Jersey governor's office is already under fire over some seemingly dirty tricks involving the George Washington Bridge. Now there are questions about money spent on ads designed to bring back tourists after Hurricane Sandy.
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, center, in one of the "Stronger Than The Storm" ads aimed at bringing tourists back to his state after Hurricane Sandy.
StrongerThanTheStorm YouTube channel
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is going to examine how the state of New Jersey spent $25 million of the federal aid it received after 2012's Hurricane Sandy, Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., has announced.
At issue in particular: whether it was appropriate to spend nearly $5 million on "Stronger Than The Storm" tourism ads featuring Republican Gov. Chris Christie and his family.
As the Asbury Park Press reported last August, the TV ads were produced by "East Rutherford-based MWW and a subcontractor. ... MWW proposed putting Christie in the ads. The other bidder, a team headed by the Sigma Group, did not. MWW won the contract."
MWW also demanded a higher fee — about $2 million more, the Press reported — than Sigma Group would have charged.
The ads hit the airwaves in 2013, an election year in New Jersey. Christie easily won a second term. He's now widely seen as a potential contender for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination.
The bridge scandal revolves around the actions of some high-ranking Christie aides. Emails show that last September they were involved in orders to close some lanes to the GW bridge from Fort Lee, N.J. At the time, officials said that a traffic study was underway. The emails paint a different picture: of Christie's aides trying to cause problems for one or more local Democratic officials. Traffic was tied up in Fort Lee for the better part of four days.