AIG Bonuses May Tarnish Other Bailouts How will the AIG bonuses affect the government's approach to repairing other crippled financial institutions? For some perspective, Renee Montagne talks with David Wessel of The Wall Street Journal.
NPR logo

AIG Bonuses May Tarnish Other Bailouts

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
AIG Bonuses May Tarnish Other Bailouts

AIG Bonuses May Tarnish Other Bailouts

AIG Bonuses May Tarnish Other Bailouts

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

How will the AIG bonuses affect the government's approach to repairing other crippled financial institutions? For some perspective, Renee Montagne talks with David Wessel of The Wall Street Journal.


Let's find out now how all that outrage about the AIG bonuses might affect the government's approach to repairing other crippled financial institutions. David Wessel joins us on the line. He's economics editor of the Wall Street Journal. Good morning.

Mr. DAVID WESSEL (Economics Editor, Wall Street Journal): Good morning, Renee.

MONTAGNE: You know, two of the questions of those bonuses, though, David, when you add it all up, the fact is they are the tiny fraction of the billions the government spent bailing out this company. So is this outrage coming from a sense that these guys are taking taxpayers for the ride, sort of thumbing their nose at us?

Mr. WESSEL: I think it's a symptom of a broader public anger that so much taxpayer money is being spent on bailing out the very institutions and people who made the mistakes that led to this huge financial crisis. People don't understand why it is that we have to pay them more money when they went and steered the economy off the cliff.

In fact, some of the money going to AIG is going to big foreign banks that had placed bets with AIG that went sour. It's the kind of public uproar that we saw last fall when the House of Representatives rejected President Bush's request for the first $700 billion of bailout money.

MONTAGNE: Well, then, beyond getting the bonuses back, what else might Congress do regarding AIG and other financial institutions?

Mr. WESSEL: Well, that's a good question. I mean, everybody's preoccupied with AIG at the moment because it's so much easier to understand than all the other complexities and acronyms that surround this thing. I suspect that this will force Congress, or Congress will use this opportunity to force the Treasury and the Fed to think harder about the overall structure of the AIG rescue, which isn't going very well, or maybe to put even more restrictions on what financial firms can pay their executives.

But the big pressing issue is that at some point, it looks like President Obama and Fed Chairman Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Geithner are going to have to go on their knees to Congress and say we need more money to fix the financial system. And in this climate, it'll be very difficult for them to get Congress to go along because Congress is responding to the anger from the American people. And the American people don't see why we need to put more money into this rat hole, as Senator Bond said.

MONTAGNE: Yeah, but so if Congress is reluctant to approve more money to fix the banks, I mean, does that mean that the government will just stay on the sidelines?

Mr. WESSEL: No, I don't think so. I mean, that's important. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation still has quite a bit of money to help a failing bank and pay off the depositors. And Congress is looking for ways to put more money into that agency, which is substantially more popular than some of the other agencies.

And they're also looking to stretch out the money they have, the money that's already been approved by Congress, either using it a lure to get private money into the banking system or to use it as leverage to get more money from the Fed, which has this wonderful feature that it doesn't need congressional okay to come up with billions and billions and billions of dollars.

MONTAGNE: And as Fed officials wrap up their regularly scheduled meeting today in Washington, is AIG going to be on their agenda?

Mr. WESSEL: It's not on their formal agenda, but I'd be surprised if it wasn't discussed. It's become a huge problem for the Fed, both in terms of their - the mechanical thing of how are they going to manage this company, and also the political uproar.

But I think that the main focus of their meeting is being, with the economy still doing very poorly, with interest - although there are some signs that maybe we're touching bottom - interest rates are at zero, the Fed has to decide whether they want to use their ability to put even more credit into the economy by buying some mortgages in the market or even buying long-term Treasury bonds to try and bring down those important interest rates.

MONTAGNE: Let me - just finally, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner was at the New York Federal Reserve when AIG was first bailed out - now Treasury secretary, of course. How is this affecting his ability to do his job?

Mr. WESSEL: Well, it certainly isn't helping. I mean, Secretary Geithner got off to a fairly slow start because he had these problems with his personal taxes. And now while they're trying to put together a very complex and actually, in some respects, well-thought-out plan to rescue the financial system, this becomes a real sideshow.

And the fact that his hands were dirty because he was in it at the beginning of AIG, that makes it just all the worse.

MONTAGNE: David, thanks very much. David Wessel is economics editor of the Wall Street Journal.

And you're listening to MORNING EDITION from NPR News.

Copyright © 2009 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

AIG Chief Asks Execs To Return Half Of Bonuses

Edward Liddy, chief executive officer of American International Group, is sworn in prior to testifying before a House subcommittee Wednesday. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Edward Liddy, chief executive officer of American International Group, is sworn in prior to testifying before a House subcommittee Wednesday.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


The head of American International Group told a congressional panel Wednesday that he asked his company's executives to give back part of the retention bonuses that have sparked widespread anger among taxpayers amid a government bailout of the ailing insurer.

"This morning, I have asked the employees of AIG financial products to step up and do the right thing," AIG Chairman and CEO Edward Liddy testified before a House Financial Services subcommittee.

"Specifically, I've asked those who received retention payments in excess of $100,000 or more to return at least half of those payments," he said. "Some have already stepped up and agreed to return 100 percent of those payments."

But Liddy defended $165 million in bonuses that were given out even as the company received billions in government bailout funds. He acknowledged that U.S. taxpayers' patience was "wearing thin" but said his hands were tied by competitive realities.

'Mistakes Were Made'

"It was distasteful to have to make these payments, but we concluded that the risk to the company and therefore the financial system and the economy were unacceptably high," he said, adding that if the bonuses were not paid, the company could lose vital talent that would precipitate a collapse.

"Americans are asking quite simply, 'Why pay these people anything at all?' " Liddy said. "Here's why: I am trying desperately to prevent an uncontrolled collapse of that business."

Liddy also told the subcommittee that "mistakes were made at AIG on a scale few could have ever imagined possible."

"We have been the beneficiary of the American people's forbearance and patience," he said. "And we are acutely aware not only that we must be good stewards of the public funds we have received, but that the patience of America's taxpayers is indeed wearing thin."

Congress, Public Seethe Over Payments

Following Liddy's opening remarks, Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), chairman of the full House committee, announced that he intended to ask for the names of those who received bonuses.

"If Mr. Liddy declines to give us the names, then I will convene the committee to vote a subpoena for the names," Frank said. "We do intend to use our power to get the names."

Liddy declined to name names out of concern for the safety of his employees, citing threats of violence that had been received.

The bonus issue has exploded since the payments, including 73 of $1 million or more, were made public last week. Average Americans — many of them facing job losses and foreclosures amid the deepening recession — are wondering why their tax dollars should go to highly paid executives who ran their company to the verge of collapse.

The outrage comes at a time when Congress and the White House are still struggling to deal with the faltering economy. The Federal Reserve announced Wednesday that it will start buying long-term government bonds, its latest step to try to lift the country out of recession. The Fed's move to buy up to $300 billion in Treasury securities over the next six months could drive down long-term interest rates.

"Job losses, declining equity and housing wealth, and tight credit conditions have weighed on consumer sentiment and spending," the central bank said in a statement.

The Fed infused an initial $85 billion into AIG last September as the company teetered under the weight of its risky investment insurance business, largely collateralized with toxic subprime mortgages.

Speaking at the White House on Wednesday, President Obama said he had metwith his economic team to draft plans for a "resolution authority" similar to the FDIC that would exert more control over financial institutions.

Acknowledging that "people are rightly outraged by these particular bonuses," the president said that "they should be equally outraged by a culture that these bonuses are a symptom of."

Ultimately, he said, "the buck stops with me."

Seeking To Recover Bonus Money

On Tuesday, Senate Democrats wrote a letter to Liddy demanding that he rescind the bonuses.

In the House, two bills were introduced specifically targeting the AIG bonuses. The bills would slap hefty excise taxes on the payments in an effort to recover at least some of the money.

Frank said he hopes a Depression-era law that allowed $85 billion in Federal Reserve money to go to AIG can be rewritten by Congress to allow legislative oversight.

"I do believe that it is time for us to assert our ownership rights under this arrangement," he said before the subcommittee. "The bonuses are wholly unjustified, and they are an example of the problem with the financial incentives that compensation gives in general."

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has been criticized for his oversight of AIG. The White House has defended Geithner, saying he first learned of the bonuses a week ago Tuesday and told administration officials about them Thursday. The bonus checks reportedly were mailed out the next day.

On Wednesday, the president defended Geithner, saying he was "making all the right moves" in playing a bad hand.

Deals Cut Early Last Year

According to documents provided by AIG to the Treasury Department, the awards ranged from $1,000 to nearly $6.5 million. Seven employees were to receive more than $3 million.

Liddy, who was tapped last year by then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to head the ailing company, will not receive a bonus. In a letter to Geithner over the weekend, the CEO said the deals for the payments were cut early last year, well before he took over AIG.

Geithner told congressional leaders in a letter Tuesday that AIG would be required "to pay the Treasury from the operations of the company the amount of the retention awards just paid."

"In addition, we will deduct from the $30 billion in assistance an amount equal to the amount of those payments," he wrote.

Liddy testified Wednesday that AIG was "too complex, too unwieldy and too opaque ... to be well managed."