World Reacts To Obama's Nobel World leaders have urged President Obama to seize the surprise award of the Nobel Peace Prize as a chance to increase diplomatic efforts to forge peace in the globe's trouble spots. The announcement is being interpreted by many in Europe as a bid to encourage Obama's diplomatic overtures toward America's enemies.
NPR logo

World Reacts To Obama's Nobel

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/113677732/113677719" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
World Reacts To Obama's Nobel

World Reacts To Obama's Nobel

World Reacts To Obama's Nobel

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/113677732/113677719" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

World leaders have urged President Obama to seize the surprise award of the Nobel Peace Prize as a chance to increase diplomatic efforts to forge peace in the globe's trouble spots. The announcement is being interpreted by many in Europe as a bid to encourage Obama's diplomatic overtures toward America's enemies.

MELISSA BLOCK, Host:

From NPR News, this is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I'm Melissa Block.

MICHELE NORRIS, Host:

And we start with NPR's Rob Gifford who's been gathering reaction outside the U.S.

ROB GIFFORD: There were audible gasps in the hall in Oslo as leader of the Norwegian Nobel Committee Thorbjoern Jagland announced that President Obama had won this year's Nobel Peace Prize. Though it was known he had been nominated, few people seriously believed that he would receive the prize, among a crowded field of global politicians and activists. But said Jagland, President Obama was the unanimous choice of the five member committee.

THORBJOERN JAGLAND: His diplomacy is founded in the concept of those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population.

GIFFORD: Jagland said that under President Obama, multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position and he lauded the president's pledges to reduce the world's stock of nuclear weapons, ease conflicts with Muslim nations and strengthen the U.S. role in combating climate change. Congratulations then poured in for President Obama from world leaders, such as German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

ANGELA MERKEL: (Foreign Language Speaking)

GIFFORD: In a short time, Merkel said, President Obama has established a new tone creating a willingness for dialogue that everyone should support. Other former laureates such a Shimon Peres, Mikhail Gorbachev, Desmond Tutu and Nelson Mandela, all congratulated President Obama. Mohamed ElBaradei won the prize in 2005 as head of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

MOHAMED ELBARADEI: Nobody today in my view who is more deserving of that peace prize than Barack Obama. He is restoring the basic core values that every one of us should live by - dialogue, respect, democracy, due process, human rights, a security system that does not depend on nuclear weapons.

GIFFORD: But not everyone took part in the transatlantic love-in. Some critics were scornful that President Obama was being rewarded for his intentions rather than his achievements, or even that he was simply receiving the award just for not being President Bush. Others such as Mehdi Hasan, a senior editor at the New Statesman magazine in London, are angry at the president's continuation of Bush administration policies.

MEHDI HASAN: This is a president, who, for right reasons or wrong reasons, has escalated the war in Afghanistan over the past nine months. He's doubled the size of the U.S. military contingent there, doubled the size of bases like Bagram. He's killed through air strikes more civilians in Pakistan in nine months than Bush killed in the whole of 2008. So, it does slightly stick in my throat to see him getting a peace prize.

GIFFORD: Rob Gifford, NPR News, London.

Copyright © 2009 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Obama's Nobel Peace Prize A Mixed Blessing At Home

President Obama watches as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas shake hands in New York on Sept. 22. The Nobel Committee recognized President Obama for his efforts to change the tenor abroad. But at home, Obama's win is unlikely to either move or hamper his agenda. Charles Dharapak/AP hide caption

toggle caption
Charles Dharapak/AP

President Obama watches as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas shake hands in New York on Sept. 22. The Nobel Committee recognized President Obama for his efforts to change the tenor abroad. But at home, Obama's win is unlikely to either move or hamper his agenda.

Charles Dharapak/AP

President Obama's stunning Nobel Peace Prize win may help solidify his international reputation and cement the prize committee's clear desire to repudiate former President George W. Bush.

Back home, however, where the president is grappling with near-record unemployment, an epic health care struggle and wars on two fronts, the honor was, at best, a mixed blessing. Even those who generally support Obama say it carries more than a dollop of political peril.

"It seems so inappropriate, so premature, that it gives sustenance to critics who say he's a celebrity honored for his existence and aspirations, not for his accomplishments," says Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution.

"With friends like the prize committee," Mann says, "who needs enemies?"

A Wash Domestically?

Though there has been a predictable flurry of criticism from Republicans, strategists from both sides of the aisle say Obama's international recognition won't move, or hamper, his domestic agenda.

"With everything going on, the lines are too well established here for this to make much of a difference," says Carl Forti, a conservative GOP strategist who worked on Republican Mitt Romney's 2008 presidential campaign.

"Obama has been well-received on the world stage, but that doesn't help him operate domestically," he says.

In Obama's own late-morning comments, he also attempted to downplay the prize — and blunt GOP criticism that had already begun. The president said he doesn't deserve to be in the company of those who have been honored before him.

"I am both surprised and deeply humbled by the decision of the Nobel Committee," he said.

"Let me be clear," he said. "I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments, but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations."

The Right Tone

The tone of his brief speech was intended, in part, to counter the morning's Republican talking points and liberal pushback.

GOP Chairman Michael Steele in a statement said it was unfortunate that Obama's "star power" outshined the "real achievements" of others. The conservative Heritage Foundation referred to the award as the "Nobel Intentions Prize."

Meanwhile, the Democratic National Committee and the liberal watchdog site Media Matters wasted no time in comparing the GOP's reaction to that of the Taliban, whose spokesman condemned the award. (The DNC also lumped Republicans in with Hamas, for good measure.)

However, politicos on Capitol Hill were generally more circumspect, leaving the vitriol to other party apparatchiks.

On CNN, Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona, Obama's opponent in the 2008 presidential race, expressed surprise at the award but said, "Americans are always pleased when their president is recognized by something on this order."

A senior GOP Senate staffer said he would counsel Republicans on Capitol Hill to avoid getting too snarky about the award, because it will have so little influence on pressing domestic issues before Congress, from health care and climate change to proposed overhauls of the nation's financial system.

Ted Widmer, a former speechwriter for President Clinton who is now director of Brown University's John Carter Brown Library, predicted that there would be no negative effect on the president — "except among people who have already decided to hate him forever."

An Impact On Afghanistan Policy?

The question of whether the peace prize will affect how Obama decides to proceed in Afghanistan is trickier.

His liberal Democratic base has been agitating for withdrawal — and may be perplexed at the Nobel committee's decision. In fact, the head of the grass-roots organization Peace Action said that the president's "modest" policy changes in his first nine months in office do not warrant a peace prize, particularly since he is considering sending more troops to Afghanistan.

Conservatives have gotten behind Obama's handpicked commander in Afghanistan, who has called for an Iraq-type surge.

Marina Ottaway at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace predicted that the award won't circumscribe the president's action.

"It could probably make it more difficult for him to declare a major escalation of the war," she says. "On the other hand, all indications have been that he has no intention of doing that in the first place."

"I don't see it as forcing his hand into doing something he wasn't going to do," she said.

The president's decisions on Afghanistan, Widmer says, are based on each day's changing reality on the ground there, and not on any prize.

Though there is no denying that with the prize come expectations of a path to be followed, experts say.

Early Honor

The general consensus is that if Obama handles the prize humbly, as he did in his speech Friday morning, his political clout at home will remain about the same: neither enhanced nor degraded.

"I think the Nobel Committee did this because they want to encourage him both personally and politically," says Jeffrey Kimball, a presidential historian and professor emeritus at Miami University of Ohio.

"Maybe by winning an election, that's part of what he did to earn the prize," Kimball says. "After all, in its history, the committee over the past century has given awards to encourage statesmanship — and also to people who many think should not have won the prize."

Among the more controversial picks was former Nixon Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in 1973, at the end of the Vietnam War.

But former Democratic Sen. Sam Nunn of Georgia, a foreign policy expert, was among those who hailed the committee's decision as recognition of the new diplomatic path Obama has embarked upon in the post-Bush era.

"He has changed the tone of U.S. foreign policy by making it clear to the world that we are in a race between cooperation and catastrophe," Nunn said in a statement. "And he has reshaped the global focus and debate."

Deepti Choubey, a nuclear proliferation expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, echoed Nunn.

"The award underscores how much the international community wants and needs American leadership — and that's something all Americans appreciate," Choubey said.

So, whether the president looks at the prize as a gift or an albatross, it's now his to make of it what he will. And, in that, there is opportunity and peril — though far less of either than partisans would like to believe.