Afghanistan, Pakistan Forge Closer Ties
RENEE MONTAGNE, Host:
SHUJA NAWAZ: Good morning.
MONTAGNE: In the early years of the war, Afghan President Hamid Karzai, and then the president of Pakistan, Pervez Musharraf, they did not get along. In fact, sometimes it seems as if they could hardly stand each other. Now, Pakistani officials regularly visit Karzai and visit the government of Afghanistan and may even be having secret talks between the two governments. What has changed?
NAWAZ: I think they realize that the United States and the coalition will be leaving, and they realize that they will remain in the neighborhood, and therefore it's important for them to have a relationship. This doesn't mean that they have completely eliminated decades of mistrust between the two countries. But tremendous amount of public opinion inside Afghanistan is very anti-Pakistan. But it's clear that Pakistan wants very much either a neutral or a friendly Afghan government, and the Pakistani perception is fed by very powerful Indian economic and political presence inside Afghanistan.
MONTAGNE: You know, it's understandable why Pakistan would want to help out Afghanistan because by being friendly, it stands to have more influence in its neighbor, Afghanistan. But there are those who say that Afghan President Karzai's interest here is born of desperation. He himself is reported to have said that he doesn't think that NATO and the U.S. will win the war, and that he's looking for allies where he can find them. And if that's Pakistan, a country that he, himself has long had antipathy for, then so be it.
NAWAZ: A stable Afghanistan would allow Afghanistan and Pakistan to open much more trade, and also to open links with Central Asia. And there is always still the possibility that once India and Pakistan reach some kind of an entente on their border, that there would be links with India which would allow Afghanistan and Pakistan to benefit from that transit trade and the fees associated with it.
MONTAGNE: Although that sounds logical what you're saying, but Pakistan's rivalry with India, might that not prevent it from allowing what seems like a positive all-around from actually happening?
NAWAZ: I think there is increasingly an awareness that this is not to be seen as a zero-sum game, that there would be advantages to all the players by opening borders. That is behind some of the recent discussions that have taken place. So some baby steps, but in the right direction.
MONTAGNE: In what ways might this moving closer together of Pakistan and Afghanistan, in what ways might it backfire?
NAWAZ: The worst case scenario is that the more radical militant groups reach Kabul and manage to displace the government at some point. The possibility then of an effect on the border regions of Pakistan where they would want to export their ideology and their militancy would then increase tremendously.
MONTAGNE: Well, just finally, whichever way it goes, it does seem as if Pakistan's relationship is growing stronger with Afghanistan. How do you see that affecting the other big player in the region, the U.S.?
NAWAZ: But centralizing power, creating autocratic systems of government is really moving in the wrong direction. So The United States' great interest is to have stable, developing, political entities, and the U.S. should do much more than it's been doing, particularly in Pakistan, to help that.
MONTAGNE: Shuja Nawaz is the director of the Atlantic Council's South Asia Center.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.