'Poisoning The Press' Recounts Nixon-Anderson Feud Mark Feldstein's gripping new account of the long-running rivalry between Richard Nixon and columnist Jack Anderson examines what is likely the all-time low point in American journalist-politician relations. His analysis of their relationship is even-handed, and hard to put down.
NPR logo 'Poisoning The Press' Recounts Nixon-Anderson Feud


Book Reviews

'Poisoning The Press' Recounts Nixon-Anderson Feud

Poisoning The Press
Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washington's Modern Scandal Culture
By Mark Feldstein
Hardcover, 480 pages
Farrar, Straus and Giroux
List Price: $30

Read An Excerpt

Mark Feldstein was an on-air correspondent and investigative reporter for CNN, ABC News and NBC News for more than 20 years. morgan-ashcom hide caption

toggle caption

Mark Feldstein was an on-air correspondent and investigative reporter for CNN, ABC News and NBC News for more than 20 years.


If Richard Nixon and Jack Anderson hadn't spent the majority of their professional lives hating each other quite so intensely, they might have become kindred spirits. The former president and the famed muckraking columnist led strangely parallel lives -- both were raised in religious families with temperamental, intimidating fathers; both had initially bright careers in Washington that would eventually end badly. And though the two men spent essentially the entire 1960s trying to ruin each other's careers through a series of escalating dirty tricks, their troubled relationship is probably most remembered for its shocking point of no return -- the 1972 plot by Nixon's "White House Plumbers" team to assassinate Anderson.

In Poisoning the Press, a gripping new account of the long-running feud between Nixon and Anderson, investigative reporter Mark Feldstein examines what is likely the all-time low point in American journalist-politician relations. The hatred between the two men started in earnest in 1960, when Anderson and his co-author Drew Pearson dedicated much of their popular "Washington Merry-Go-Round" column to a financial scandal involving Nixon's brother and Howard Hughes. It was, writes Feldstein, this "brilliant and chillingly ruthless political hit" that ensured Anderson a spot on Nixon's so-called enemies list. Anderson would reprise these political hits many times in the next decade, hounding Nixon when he ran for California governor in 1962 and when he ran for president in 1968.

Nixon would, of course, retaliate, first getting the CIA to spy (fruitlessly) on the columnist. When nothing turned up, Nixon finally asked an aide to "stop Anderson at all costs." Nixon's team discussed a variety of options, including, most oddly, putting LSD on the steering wheel of Anderson's car, in the hopes that he would hallucinate while driving and die in an accident. The trippy assassination never happened, of course, and it's still unclear how much Nixon knew about the plot.

Nixon and Anderson were both extremely controversial figures, but Feldstein proves remarkably calm and even-handed throughout the book, even while discussing some of the men's lowest moments (Nixon's resignation in 1974; Anderson's inexplicable decision to censor his own expose on the Iran-Contra scandal). Feldstein has remarkable narrative skills -- if the names weren't so familiar, and the setting weren't decades ago, you could almost think you're reading a dystopian political thriller. And though the book deals in scandal, it's never lurid; Feldstein is engaging, but never sensationalistic. He writes with the kind of restraint and responsibility that always evaded his two main subjects, and the result isn't just interesting -- it's an absolutely essential book for anyone interested in American political history.

Excerpt: 'Poisoning the Press'

Poisoning The Press
Poisoning the Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, and the Rise of Washington's Scandal Culture
By Mark Feldstein
Hardcover, 480 pages
Farrar, Straus and Giroux
List Price: $30


It seemed an unlikely spot to plan an assassination. After all, the Hay-Adams was once one of Washington’s most venerable old mansions, adorned with plush leather chairs, rich walnut paneling, and ornate oil paintings, located on Lafayette Square directly across the street from the White House. But on a chilly afternoon in March 1972, in one of the most bizarre and overlooked chapters of American political history, the luxury hotel did indeed serve as a launching pad for a murder conspiracy. More surprising still was the target of this assassination scheme, syndicated columnist Jack Anderson, then the most famous investigative reporter in the United States, whose exposes had plagued President Richard Nixon since he had first entered politics more than two decades earlier. Most astonishing of all, the men who plotted to execute the journalist were covert Nixon operatives dispatched after the President himself darkly informed aides that Anderson was "a thorn in [his] side" and that "we’ve got to do something with this son of a bitch."

The conspirators included former agents of the FBI and CIA who had been trained in a variety of clandestine techniques, including assassinations, and who would later go to prison for their notorious break-in at Democratic Party headquarters in the Watergate building. According to their own testimony, the men weighed various methods of eliminating the columnist: by spiking one of his drinks or his aspirin bottle with a special poison that would go undetected in an autopsy, or by putting LSD on his steering wheel so that he would absorb it through his skin while driving and die in a hallucination-crazed auto crash.

In one sense, the White House plot to poison a newsman was unprecedented. Certainly no other president in American history had ever been suspected of ordering a Mafia-style hit to silence a journalistic critic. Yet it was also an extreme and literal example of a larger conspiracy to contaminate the rest of the media as well, a metaphor for what would become a generation of toxic conflict between the press and the politicians they covered. It was not just that Nixon’s administration wiretapped journalists, put them on enemies lists, audited their tax returns, censored their newspapers, and moved to revoke their broadcasting licenses. It was, more lastingly, that Nixon and his staff pioneered the modern White House propaganda machine, using mass-market advertising techniques to manipulate its message in ways that all subsequent administrations would be forced to emulate. Nixon simultaneously introduced the notion of liberal media bias even as he launched a host of spinmeisters who assembled a network of conservative news outlets that would drive the political agenda into the twenty-first century. At the same time, Nixon and subsequent presidents effectively bought off news corporations by deregulating them, allowing them to gorge themselves on a noxious diet of sensationalism and trivialities that reaped record profits while debasing public discourse.

How did all of this come to pass? In many ways, the rise of Washington’s modern scandal culture began with Richard Nixon and Jack Anderson, and their blistering twenty-five-year battle symbolized and accelerated the growing conflict between the presidency and the press in the Cold War era. This bitter struggle between the most embattled politician and reviled investigative reporter of their time would lead to bribery and blackmail, forgery and burglary, sexual smears and secret surveillance -- as well as the assassination plot. Their story reveals not only how one president sabotaged the press, but also how this rancorous relationship continues to the present day. It was Richard Nixon’s ultimate revenge.

It was this very lust for revenge -- Nixon’s obsession with enemies -- that would destroy him in the end. In the President’s eyes, his antagonists in what he called the "Eastern establishment" were legion: liberals, activists, intellectuals, members of Congress, the federal bureaucracy. But none was more roundly despised than the news media, and none in the media more than Jack Anderson, a bulldog of a reporter who pounded out his blunt accusations on the green keys of an old brown manual typewriter in an office three blocks from the White House. Although largely forgotten today, Anderson was once the most widely read and feared newsman in the United States, a self-proclaimed Paul Revere of journalism with a confrontational style that matched his beefy physique. Part freedom fighter, part carnival huckster, part righteous rogue, the flamboyant columnist was the last descendant of the crusading muckrakers of the early twentieth century. He held their lonely banner aloft in the conformist decades afterward, when deference to authority characterized American journalism and politics alike.

At his peak, Anderson reached an audience approaching seventy million people -- nearly the entire voting populace -- in radio and television broadcasts, magazines, newsletters, books, and speeches. But it was his daily 750-word exposé, the "Washington Merry-Go-Round," that was the primary source of his power; published in nearly one thousand newspapers, it became the longest- running and most popular syndicated column in the nation. Anderson’s exposes -- acquired by eavesdropping, rifling through garbage, and swiping classified documents -- sent politicians to prison and led targets to commit suicide. He epitomized everything that Richard Nixon abhorred.

The President had always believed the press was out to get him, and in Anderson he found confirmation of his deepest anxieties. The newsman had a hand in virtually every key slash-and-burn attack on Nixon during his career, from the young congressman’s earliest Red-baiting in the 1940s to his financial impropriety in the White House during the 1970s. Even Nixon’s most intimate psychiatric secrets were fodder for Anderson’s column. The battle between the two men lasted a generation, triggered by differences of politics and personality, centered on the most inflammatory Washington scandals of their era. In the beginning, Anderson’s relentless reporting helped plant the first seeds of Nixonian press paranoia. In the end, Anderson’s disclosures led to criminal convictions of senior presidential advisers and portions of articles of impeachment against the Chief Executive himself. The columnist both exposed and fueled the worst abuses of the Nixon White House, which eventually reached their apogee in the Watergate scandal that ended his presidency in disgrace.

Excerpted from Poisoning The Press: Richard Nixon, Jack Anderson, And The Rise Of Washington's Scandal Culture by Mark Feldstein. Copyright 2010 by Mark Feldstein. Excerpted by permission of Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Correction Sept. 29, 2010

This story initially gave an incorrect date for President Nixon's resignation. He resigned in August 1974.

Books Featured In This Story