Bush Administration the First Steered by Oilmen The Bush White House is the first to be headed by a president and vice president with backgrounds in the oil business. The administration has produced a consistent approach to energy policy: finding new supplies and securing the old.
NPR logo

Bush Administration the First Steered by Oilmen

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/16315117/16314362" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Bush Administration the First Steered by Oilmen

Bush Administration the First Steered by Oilmen

Bush Administration the First Steered by Oilmen

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/16315117/16314362" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

At first, the watchword was incentive — and the byword was secrecy. Vice President Dick Cheney led a task force on energy that would not even reveal its own members or advisors. Later, the administration acted aggressively on at least one task force recommendation — that drilling be allowed in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and in certain sensitive offshore areas previously closed to exploration and development.

Those who urged more conservation — or less dependence on foreign oil — were told that cutting back would never make enough difference and that only a big technological breakthrough, such as fuel cells, would lower the American demand for oil.

No one ever said the demand might not rise, however, and that has been the trajectory. With the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the price of oil resumed the kind of leaping increases associated with the early and late 1970s. This year, fears about the war widening from Iraq into Iran (and from Afghanistan into Pakistan) helped push the price to a historic high.

In the second Bush term, the growing global demand for oil and the continued disruption of supplies caused by the Iraq war has increased upward pressure on prices at the wellhead. A barrel of crude went from about $25 at its low point in the first Bush term to nearly $100, with many experts saying it would go far higher — and faster — than anyone had expected just a few years earlier.

New Message, Same Approach

Along the way, President Bush changed his message and moderated his pro-production stance. He even bemoaned how the U.S. had become "addicted" to oil in his 2006 State of the Union address to Congress.

Still, policy did not change to match the rhetorical shift. The administration backed greater use of ethanol in motor fuels and showed more interest in energy saving, but it refused to raise gasoline taxes to decrease consumption, continuing instead to pump more oil into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which many critics had argued could be reduced as a means of lowering prices.

David Kirsch spent 16 years working on energy issues at the State Department, part of it during the administration of George W. Bush. He left that job in 2006 and now works for PFC Energy, a global energy consultant.

"What this administration has been looking for is a technological fix, something that will change the nation's addiction to oil without actually forcing Americans to change their behavior," he said.

Attack on Iran Remains a Concern

He said the administration has done things that have made the problem of oil prices worse. The Iraq war definitely drove up prices by creating worries about supply, though he adds that it is impossible to quantify just how much of the jump in prices is a result of the war.

"The main worry out there is that the administration could still bomb Iran," he said. "It's now or never, and that is the key worry out there in the markets for the next 14 months."

The Bush administration downplays such connections.

White House Press Secretary Dana Perino recently said that the price of oil has been building for a decade. When asked if tensions with Iran will drive prices even higher, she declined to comment on market conditions or potential market movements.

Oil Approaches $100 a Barrel. What Now?

As the price of oil nears $100 a barrel, expect to pay more at the pumps as well as to fly, to mail packages and to heat homes. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images hide caption

Graphic: Historical Prices of Crude Oil and Gas (in the U.S.)
toggle caption
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

The average price for a barrel of crude for all of 1980 was more than $93. It's taken more than a quarter century, but oil prices are once again approaching that level. hide caption

toggle caption

The average price for a barrel of crude for all of 1980 was more than $93. It's taken more than a quarter century, but oil prices are once again approaching that level.

Oil prices are nearing $100 a barrel these days. Prices have more than quadrupled since 2002 and seem to be heading in only one direction: up. The higher oil prices affect everyone from a factory worker in China to a farmer in Iowa. The global oil industry is vast and, at times, confusing. Here are some questions — and answers — raised by the recent spike in oil prices.

Why have oil prices risen so steeply? Is there a single reason?

There are many reasons, analysts say, ranging from a weak dollar to tensions between the U.S. and Iran. At the heart of the problem, though, is the fact that global demand is currently outstripping global supply. Countries such as China and India are thirsty for oil to fuel their economic growth, yet the world's oil-producing regions are producing less oil. In Nigeria, tensions in the Niger Delta region have curtailed production by nearly a million barrels a day. Fears of war between the U.S. and Iran, one of the world's biggest oil producers, have driven up prices further. And some of the world's major oil fields — the Cantarell Field in Mexico, for instance — are yielding disappointing amounts of crude oil this year, for geological, not geopolitical reasons.

Can't some oil-rich nations simply start producing more oil and bring prices down?

Not necessarily. Most of the world's oil producers are already working at full capacity, pumping every barrel of oil they can. Only one country in the world, Saudi Arabia, has excess production capacity — and no one but the Saudis knows exactly how much excess capacity.

What about tapping into new oil reserves?

That's always a possibility, but it's not clear where the most promising reserves lie — and some regions, such as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, are environmentally sensitive. In any event, it takes many years before a newly discovered oil field can begin producing crude.

What is the immediate impact of higher oil prices for consumers?

Expect to pay more at the pumps, of course. But the pain doesn't end there. Airlines are already adding fuel surcharges to the price of tickets. Delivery companies such as Federal Express and U.P.S. are also charging more. Heating oil will cost more this winter (especially a problem in the Northeast.) Food costs also rise in tandem with oil prices, since farmers spend more on fuel for their tractors and other equipment, and transport costs also rise. Even the price of plastic goods might increase, since plastic is a petrochemical product. Economists worry about a "ripple effect": As people spend more on gasoline, heating oil and other staples, they have less money available to spend on other items. Consumer spending accounts for two-thirds of all economic activity.

So might higher oil prices tip the economy into recession?

It's possible — that's what happened in 1973 — but most economists say it's unlikely this time. One reason is that the U.S. economy has shifted from a largely manufacturing to a service economy, and therefore our energy needs (as a percentage of GDP) are lower. Also, cars and airplanes are, overall, significantly more efficient today than they were 35 years ago. True, other economic liabilities — the fallout from subprime mortgages, a weak dollar — don't help matters, but high oil prices alone aren't likely to cause a recession, economists say.

With oil so expensive, somebody must be making a lot of money.

Yes. The oil companies are doing very well, but not equally well. Companies that specialize in withdrawing crude oil from the ground are making the most money. Those that also refine the oil into gasoline (and other products) are earning slightly less money, since the cost of refining has increased recently, as companies shut down portions of refineries for maintenance and repairs in anticipation of winter demand.

Exxon-Mobil, the world's largest publicly traded oil company, recently reported a profit of $9.4 billion. Impressive, but not quite as impressive as the $10.5 billion it reported a year earlier — more money than any publicly traded company has made in U.S. history.

Which countries are benefiting from higher oil prices?

The traditional big-oil producers, such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and other Persian Gulf nations, but also relative newcomers to the oil game, such as Kazakhstan and other nations that border the oil-rich Caspian Sea. Iran, Russia and Venezuela are also big winners. Higher oil prices might embolden leaders of those nations to play a more assertive role on the world stage and, in the case of Iran, deflect international pressure to dismantle its nuclear program.

And the countries that suffer?

Any nation that is a net importer of oil, such as the U.S. and most European nations. The European pain, however, is blunted by the strong Euro and Europe's fuel-efficient transport systems. China is another loser. It's appetite for oil is seemingly insatiable, and it's already paying more for that addiction. India is potentially even more vulnerable: It uses less oil than China but imports 70 percent of it, compared with 50 percent for China.

How high can oil prices get?

Technically, there's no limit. The market determines the price. A few analysts foresee oil prices climbing to $120 or even $150 per barrel in coming months. Eventually, though, the law of supply and demand will kick in and prices will fall, especially if consumers begin to cut back on the gasoline they consume (something that hasn't happened yet). Some analysts call the current price spike an "oil bubble," one that will pop sooner rather than later. Also, oil prices are cyclical. They tend to go up in the autumn as people stockpile supplies for the winter and then fall again in the spring.

Might anything good come from expensive oil?

Some environmentalists certainly think so. With oil so expensive, developing alternative energy becomes a much more attractive proposition. In fact, some proponents of cleaner energy sources are openly rooting for oil prices to keep going up, up, up.