Why Harvard Is Halting Its Early Action Program Starting in the fall of '07, Harvard will no longer offer "early action" option for applicants. Critics say that such policies put underprivileged students at a disadvantage and ratchet up the pressure for everyone.
NPR logo Why Harvard Is Halting Its Early Action Program

Why Harvard Is Halting Its Early Action Program

Harvard's decision to eliminate early action for the Class of 2012 adds one more twist to the already confusing application process. We've got nine things you need to know about applying early in the wake of the Harvard announcement. Scroll down to smarten up.

Harvard University is ending its policy of admitting some students much earlier in their senior year of high school. The new Harvard policy will take effect in the fall of 2007, for students hoping to enter Harvard as freshmen in September 2008. Critics say such early admissions policies discriminate against students from poorer families and ratchet up the pressure on students. NPR's Education Editor Steve Drummond answers some questions about the announcement.

What will the new policy be?

Currently, students have the option of applying for early admission to Harvard by Nov. 1 of their senior year of high school. In mid-December, those applicants find out whether they've gotten in. That's a big advantage. They know early so they can stop worrying.

The new policy sets one application deadline for everyone: January 1. And all applicants will now have to wait until April to find out whether they're in.

Q: There was some concern that early admissions was an unfair policy?

Critics say that early admissions favors students from more educated families and from more affluent high schools. These students have the know-how to get their applications in early. Poorer families or students whose parents didn't go to college might not even know that early admissions exists. Critics also say that those students often need to weigh several admissions offers to see which has the best financial aid. So they might skip the early admissions process because they wouldn't be able to make those comparisons.

Interim Harvard President Derek Bok says the new policy will be "simpler and fairer." Harvard students from families that earn less than $60,000 a year already receive a free ride.

What's the point of early admissions?

In some ways, the rise of early admissions policies has been a response to the U.S. News college rankings. Until 2003, U.S. News ranked "yield" -- the proportion of students who were admitted and who actually attended a school. Early admissions was seen as a way of "locking in" those students and preventing them from going somewhere else. Many of these policies required students who'd been accepted to attend, though Harvard's was nonbinding. Harvard says it's concerned that not many students were able to see that distinction.

Why isn't Harvard instituting this policy for this fall?

Bok says the one-year delay will give other universities time to respond and adjust their policies accordingly. And Harvard says it hopes other schools will follow suit.

How significant is this?

It's significant in terms of the relatively few highly selective colleges and universities in the country. Harvard, of course, is an Ivy League school and a leader in this field. It's likely that other institutions will follow suit. In some ways though, for the vast majority of the 15 million college students in the country -- many of whom attend community colleges or state colleges or universities that admit virtually every applicant -- this won't have much of an effect.

Nine Things You Need to Know About Early Action

Harvard's decision to eliminate early action for the Class of 2012 adds one more twist to an already confusing process. If other schools follow suit and phase out early admissions programs, the college application process could change radically. Here are nine things you need to know about applying early in the wake of the Harvard announcement, courtesy of three experts in higher education.

Jack Maguire is the former Dean of Admissions at Boston College and founded Maguire Associates, a consulting firm which advises higher-education clients on marketing to prospective students.

Jonathan Reider is the director of college counseling at San Francisco's University High School and a former senior associate director of admissions at Stanford University.

Chris Avery is the Roy E. Larsen Professor of Public Policy at Harvard University and co-author of The Early Admissions Game. In his current research, he studies college application patterns and enrollment choices of high school students.

1. Harvard's decision may eventually simplify the admissions process, but for now, you need to be familiar with five options.

Depending on where you apply, you'll probably have at least two options from this menu: regular decision, early decision, single-choice early action, multiple-choice early action, and rolling admissions.

Regular and rolling admissions are the least complex. With regular admissions, you can apply to as many schools as you'd like, and weigh various financial-aid packages before making a final decision. But you may not find out whether you're accepted until April, and at many schools, the acceptance rate for regular admission applicants is lower than for early applicants.

With early decision, you apply in the fall and find out in December if you're admitted. The decision is binding; if admitted, you must withdraw all your other applications.

Early action has two variations: single-choice and multiple-choice. With both variations, you apply early and find out your decision in December, but the decision is nonbinding. You are allowed to also apply to schools through regular decision, and compare financial-aid packages.

2. Next year's class of high school seniors can no longer apply to Harvard for early action.

The new policy takes effect for next year's applicants to Harvard. However, some Ivy Leagues have not followed Harvard's lead. Yale, for instance, has decided to keep its early action option.

3. Some students benefit from early decision; others don't.

At selective schools, the acceptance rate for early applicants is almost always higher than for the pool of regular applicants. "If you know exactly where you want to go," says Chris Avery, "It will help your admissions chances to apply early."

But early decision presents what Jack Maguire calls a "catch-22" for students who need financial aid: "If you apply early you might have a higher chance of getting in versus if you apply late you might have a higher chance of getting money."

4. Harvard can afford to abolish early action, but not every school can.

Harvard's yield is the highest in the country. Almost 80 percent of the students admitted to Harvard's Class of 2006 decided to enroll, so the school doesn't have to worry that ending early action will have any impact on the profile of its student body.

"A kid has to be very thoughtful about turning Harvard down," Reider says.

5. Applying early isn't good for a high school student's stress level (not to mention their parents'.)

Instead of digging into their senior year classes, early applicants may end up spending way too much time focusing on their application.

6. Early application can come back to haunt you in freshman year.

Many early admittees slack off the second they get their December acceptance. That may sound good to high schoolers, but what colleges have found is that many of these kids have gaps in their senior year education as a result.

"Both college and high school faculty are concerned that seniors aren't working hard enough," says Maguire. Harvard's decision will mean that their applicants will have to work throughout the spring in order to be accepted in April.

7. Harvard's decision won't have dire consequences for legacy applicants.

Harvard's "not going to forget about legacy and development cases. They're not going to revolutionize the process," Reider says. Nor should overachievers worry. If you're the head of your class and president of the Drama Club and scored a 1600 on the SATs, there's no reason to think this decision will affect your chances.

"The top kids — the wicked smart kids who were getting in early — are still going to get in regular later," says Reider. "What's going to change is a little bit at the end of the process, you're going to have more spaces to fill."

8. Athletes who dream of representing the Crimson needn't worry, either.

If you're trying to become the next Harvard quarterback, the end of early action won't affect you one way or the other. Harvard is part of Division 1, which recruits athletes independent of the early decision timetable.

9. In the coming weeks, at least a few other schools are likely to follow in Harvard's footsteps.

Yale and Stanford are two possible copycats, Reider says. When Harvard announced it was changing from multiple early-action to single early-action, the two schools each followed suit. And other selective schools have a habit of following Ivy League initiatives as well.

Bonus Tip: Don't think about cheating the system if you are applying early decision.

No matter how sneaky you are, your high school counselor must send your transcripts out. And a counselor will not send out more than one transcript if you've applied early decision or single-choice early action. But what if you somehow manage to outfox your overworked counselor? Then you could be in big trouble — if the schools find out, they'll all reject you.