Fuel Economy Has Backers; Details to Come President Bush has surprised skeptics by proposing dramatically tougher fuel economy standards for cars and trucks. Starting in 2010, gas mileage would have to improve by 4 percent each year — in most cases, that's a one-mile-per-gallon increase every year.
NPR logo

Fuel Economy Has Backers; Details to Come

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/7120263/7120265" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Fuel Economy Has Backers; Details to Come

Fuel Economy Has Backers; Details to Come

Fuel Economy Has Backers; Details to Come

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/7120263/7120265" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

President Bush has surprised skeptics by proposing dramatically tougher fuel economy standards for cars and trucks. Starting in 2010, gas mileage would have to improve by 4 percent each year — in most cases, that's a one-mile-per-gallon increase every year.


We heard some of that focus on fuel efficiency in President Bush's State of the Union address. He called for new rules to make cars and trucks go much farther on a gallon of gas. Attempts to raise fuel efficiency standards have been stymied for decades.

Now, as NPR's Kathleen Schalch reports, the debate isn't over whether to make cars and trucks get better gas mileage. It's over how to do it.

KATHLEEN SCHALCH: President Bush wants improved fuel economy to save up to eight and a half billion gallons of gasoline annually by the year 2017. David Friedman, a frequent critic of the administration's energy policy, is impressed.

Mr. DAVID FRIEDMAN (Union of Concerned Scientists): If you're going to get 8.5 billion gallons of gasoline saved, you need to raise fuel economy standards to 34 miles per gallon by that time.

SCHALCH: In other words, a decade from now, cars and trucks would have to go an average of 10 miles farter on a gallon of gas than they do today.

Friedman, a clean vehicles expert with the Union of Concerned Scientists, says that's pretty dramatic when you consider the lack of progress until now. On average, Friedman says, vehicles sold today actually get worse gas mileage than they did two decades ago.

Mr. FRIEDMAN: It could be a breakthrough if this ends up in law. I think with so much momentum with the fact that the president now agrees with leaders in Congress on how far we need to raise these standards. It's time for them to stop debating and get this done.

SCHALCH: Key lawmakers plan to introduce bills to raise gas mileage by 4 percent per year. That's the president's goal, too. But they disagree over how to get there says Richard Newell. He's an energy economist with Duke University and Resources for the Future.

Mr. RICHARD NEWELL (Duke University): The administration has not supported the idea that Congress would write a number into legislation, and so I believe it will continue to not support that idea.

SCHALCH: Instead, President Bush wants the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to decide how much to boost fuel economy and then write a rule. NTSA administrator Nicole Nathan.

Ms. NICOLE NATHAN (National Traffic Safety Administration): It would be a very aggressive rule making, but we are also asking for the authority to make sure that we are doing the rule making based on a cost benefit analysis using sound science and without impacting safety, for example, and that is why we prefer to have the authority to do the rule making process ourselves.

SCHALCH: The new rule for passenger cars would be quite different from the existing one. That rule focuses on fleet averages. The cars each company sells must average at least 27.5 miles per gallon. Detroit's Big Three complain that's unfair because their cars are bigger on average than their competitors, so it's harder to make them fuel efficient. The proposed rule would set different fuel economy standards based on the size of each vehicle.

But this approach unnerved some lawmakers, including Massachusetts Democrat Ed Markey. He called it faith-based rule making.

Representative ED MARKEY (Democrat, Massachusetts): The plan has no guarantee that in fact the Department of Transportation will increase in any meaningful way the fuel economy standards of the American automotive fleet.

SCHALCH: Markey also worries that leaving it to the federal bureaucracy would take too long. He says the technology needed to raise fuel economy is available now. But Honda Motors manager John German told lawmakers this week most carmakers and consumers haven't made this a priority.

Mr. JOHN GERMAN (Manager, Honda Motors): Since 1987, technology's gone into the fleet at a rate that could have improved fuel economy by almost 1.5 percent per year if it had not gone to other attributes valued more highly by consumers, such as performance, luxury, utility and safety.

SCHALCH: Rising oil prices and worries about global warming have fueled a new bipartisan sense of urgency. Lawmakers who once advocated leaving fuel economy to the market to decide are changing their minds. The question is whether the president and Congress will find a way to compromise.

Kathleen Schalch, NPR News. Washington.

Copyright © 2007 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

CAFE Standards: Gas-Sipping Etiquette for Cars

SUVs on a lot average 17 miles per gallon. Tim Boyle/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption
Tim Boyle/Getty Images

Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards have pretty much stayed flat for more than a decade. Efforts to require cars and trucks to be more fuel efficient have repeatedly been stymied in Congress. Doug Beach for NPR/Source: NHTSA hide caption

toggle caption
Doug Beach for NPR/Source: NHTSA

Note: CAFE standards were in place for light trucks as early as 1979. Until 1982, automakers could comply with separate standards for two-wheel drive and four-wheel drive trucks. From 1982 until 1991, automakers could continue to comply with the separate standards or with a combined standard for all light trucks. Beginning in 1992, light trucks only needed to meet the combined standard. For the purposes of this graph, only the combined standard for light trucks is shown.

Doug Beach for NPR/Source: NHTSA

  Doug Beach for NPR/Source: EPA hide caption

toggle caption
Doug Beach for NPR/Source: EPA


Doug Beach for NPR/Source: EPA

The average fuel economy of new U.S. vehicles — a figure that counts both cars and trucks — jumped dramatically in the first 10 years after federal standards were introduced. Improvements became sluggish from the mid to late '80s — and fuel economy actually slid from the late '80s to the mid-'90s.


Since then, overall fuel efficiency hasn't budged much. The main reason: Americans have switched to driving bigger cars and trucks, which guzzle more gas than passenger vehicles.

Pumping gas
Judith Bicking


The Environmental Protection Agency has long been criticized for the testing procedure it uses to gauge fuel economy — which determines the mileage numbers that car shoppers seen on window stickers.


The current EPA method, introduced in the 1970s, is based on outdated assumptions: that motorists drive slower than they really do, that they never use air-conditioning, never go up a hill, never start their cars in the cold, never get stuck in traffic jams, etc.


In 1985, the EPA tried to account for some of the shortcomings in its lab-based tests by adjusting its fuel-economy numbers downward by 10 percent for city driving, and 22 percent for highway mileage. The revised figures were slightly more realistic, but critics argued that they still failed to account for real-world driving conditions that can drag down gas mileage.


In early 2006, the EPA proposed going one step further, adding tests to simulate high-speed driving, rapid acceleration and stop-and-go traffic, among other factors. The new system will likely slash mileage ratings for many models by 10 percent to 20 percent for city driving.


The revamped testing procedure is expected to be in place for 2008 models. The change will force carmakers to post lower mileage numbers on window stickers, but it won't affect whether they are judged to be in compliance with CAFE standards.


That's because back when the EPA first revised its mileage numbers downward, automakers won a lawsuit barring the agency from using the new numbers for CAFE purposes. The Department of Transportation, which administers the CAFE program, still uses the overly optimistic numbers produced by the earliest mpg tests.

CAFE standards — short for Corporate Average Fuel Economy — dictate the number of miles per gallon that an automaker should get for the range of vehicles it sells. Originating during the energy crisis of the 1970s, the standards represented the federal government's attempt at reducing fuel consumption by boosting the fuel economy of cars and light trucks.

The standards ushered in an early surge in fuel economy for new cars and trucks. But CAFE requirements haven't changed much in more than a decade — and neither has the gas mileage of the vehicles that Americans drive. Below, a primer on these gas-sipping rules of the road:

What are current CAFE standards?

The current standard for passenger automobiles is 27.5 mpg. The standard for light-trucks — a classification that also includes SUVs under 8,500 pounds — rose to 22.2 mpg for model-year 2007 and will get bumped up to 22.5 for 2008 models.

Why don't light trucks and SUVs have to meet the same fuel-economy standards as passenger cars?

Light trucks and SUVs are subject to different fuel-economy standards because, when the standards were first conceived, lawmakers wanted to give U.S. farmers a break during the oil embargo of the '70s. Those breaks remained in place long after the embargo disappeared.

The Bush administration has taken small steps to correct this. Rules that went into effect in April 2006 will boost fuel-economy standards for light trucks by an average of slightly less than 2 mpg over four years. The expected gas savings — an estimated 10.7 billion gallons of gas over the next two decades — is less than what Americans now use in a single month.

What's the fuel-economy standard for a Hummer?

Actually, there is no standard for a Hummer. That's because really big vehicles — those weighing more than 8,500 pounds — aren't covered by fuel-economy standards. When the standards were first developed in the '70s, lawmakers assumed that any vehicle that large would only have industrial uses. They didn't foresee that an American family might actually cruise around in a behemoth the size of a Hummer or a Ford Excursion, which get ghastly gas mileage. The Hummer is not officially tested for fuel efficiency, but reports suggest it gets a measly 11 mpg.

Have CAFE standards been successful in boosting fuel economy?

CAFE standards led to a dramatic surge in fuel economy in the first decade after they were introduced. But starting in the mid-'80s, improvements became sluggish. And from 1990 to 2005, the average fuel economy of new vehicles — both cars and trucks combined — actually declined slightly. The reason: American drivers have increasingly switched to driving SUVs and trucks (they account for half of all new vehicles sold), which guzzle more gas than passenger cars.

What's the argument for raising fuel-economy standards?

One argument for higher CAFE standards is that the standards have barely budged since the 1980s. Supporters say the program would be more effective if lawmakers raised fuel-economy requirements, given that new technologies make better gas mileage quite feasible. But critics say the whole program has failed; they want to do away with the standards altogether.

Lawmakers who want to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil argue that boosting fuel economy in transportation — which accounts for about 27 percent of U.S. energy consumption — would go a long way toward that goal. Environmentalists note that easing our addiction to gas would reduce air pollution and help fight global warming.

What kind of existing technology could make vehicles more fuel efficient?

Technology already exists to make vehicles get at least 10 more miles per gallon; supporters of raising fuel-economy standards say it could be incorporated into cars in a cost-effective manner.

One study found that, when gas costs more than $2.30 a gallon, technologies that raise fuel-efficiency to around 33 mpg across the fleet pay for themselves within three to four years.

According to Tom Cole of the Center for Automotive Research, even big cars could save a lot of fuel with improvements, such as six-speed automatic transmissions, cylinders that shut down when they are not needed, and improved aerodynamics and materials. For an extra $1,000, Cole says, a conventional, gas-powered car could go 25 percent farther on a single gallon of gas.

What are the arguments against higher CAFE standards?

Struggling U.S. automakers argue that raising fuel-economy standards could push them over the financial edge. They say that higher fuel-efficiency standards could add thousands of dollars to the manufacturing cost of each vehicle; these costs will be higher for U.S. automakers than for their foreign counterparts, whose fleets are already filled with lighter, more efficient trucks. Thus, the argument goes, higher fuel-economy standards would lead to financial losses and job cuts.

CAFE supporters counter that the world's demand for oil — especially in places such as China — is increasing, but its supply is inexorably dwindling. They say American automakers need to get on the fuel-efficient bandwagon if they are to remain competitive with their Japanese counterparts.

What about safety concerns?

Opponents of higher fuel-economy standards often cite safety concerns. They argue that, in order to meet tougher standards, carmakers would be forced to make smaller, lighter vehicles — and these are more likely to crumple in a crash.

CAFE proponents cite a 2001 study by the National Academy of Sciences that concluded the fuel economy of passenger cars and trucks could be boosted cost-efficiently and without compromising safety. They also note that SUVs are less maneuverable than passenger cars and have a history of being more prone to rollovers.