Diplomatic Abuse of Servants Hard to ProsecuteThe U.S. government aggressively prosecutes cases of domestic slavery — except when the employer is a diplomat. Diplomatic immunity limits the ability to prosecute, even when servants are recognized as victims of human trafficking.
The State Department says that whenever there's evidence that a foreign diplomat in the United States has enslaved a domestic servant, the agency encourages victims to come forward and have their claims investigated.
The State Department says that in some cases, it has asked diplomats to leave the United States because of domestic abuse. But it might be more likely that the U.S. government deals with diplomatic slavery cases more often by compensating the servant — while letting the diplomat go free. Read that story.
For years, stories have circulated around Washington, D.C., of foreign diplomats who mistreat their domestic servants in the United States.
Many diplomats assigned to America bring their domestic workers with them. Some servants have accused employers of withholding their passports, restricting their freedom of movement and burdening them with long work days for extremely low pay. Sometimes, allegations of physical abuse also come into play. But because the accused have diplomatic immunity, U.S. authorities can do little against them.
When Immunity Isn't at Issue
In many ways, the story of Harold and Kimberly Countryman is typical of such accusations of domestic slavery. The key difference: The Countrymans are U.S. citizens.
When Kimberly Countryman was planning the family's move from Korea to the United States, she called a labor broker to find someone who would move to America to work for her. Countryman didn't want to hire a native Korean like herself; she was looking for someone who would be subservient. A Cambodian woman — a survivor of the Khmer Rouge, a widow with four children — answered the ad.
In the United States, the Cambodian woman lived with the Countrymans in a plush, gated house outside Washington, D.C. But she didn't have freedom.
"They held her passport," says Chuck Rosenberg, the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. "Her wages came out to roughly a dollar an hour."
He says the woman was berated and sometimes assaulted.
The Countrymans were not diplomats. So when a neighbor tipped off the authorities, the couple were not protected by diplomatic immunity. They were arrested.
Harold Countryman worked for the State Department. His wife hatched the plan to obtain a fraudulent visitor's visa for the Cambodian woman, and her husband went along with it. Now the couple have pleaded guilty to visa fraud, and they're paying the Cambodian woman $50,000 in restitution. Harold Countryman is on probation; his wife is headed to prison.
The Countrymans' story illustrates what the federal government can do when it decides to prosecute a forced-domestic-labor case — and diplomatic immunity isn't a barrier.
But when diplomatic immunity exists, "it's a game stopper," says prosecutor Rosenberg.
"If there's immunity, it's not really worth fretting over how much evidence we would have otherwise," he says.
Cases Difficult to Prosecute
Nobody really knows how often such servant abuse occurs at the hands of diplomats. No government agency tracks cases.
Recently, the U.S. government's human-trafficking experts asked immigration lawyers in New York and Washington, D.C., how many cases of domestic slavery they had handled in which the employer was a diplomat. The unscientific and unofficial count: more than 40 cases, involving workers from all over the world, from Cameroon to Peru to Russia. None of the cases resulted in convictions.
"The fact that there are these claims means there needs to be investigations," says Gonzalo Gallegos, a spokesman for the U.S. State Department. "And we encourage all of those out there, who believe this may be happening, to go to their authorities and to follow through, so we can find out exactly what is happening and where it is happening."
Immigration lawyer Suzanne Tomatore says she has reported 15 of these cases to authorities. None has been prosecuted. However, Tomatore says the U.S. government has recognized nine of those 15 clients as victims of human trafficking.
"We've actually been able to obtain nine T visas, which are special immigration visas for victims of human trafficking for folks who were trafficked by diplomatic or U.N. officials," she says.
Diplomats Asked to Leave U.S.
The State Department's Gallegos said he could not talk about specific cases. But he described his agency's approach.
"If there's a criminal act, we seek to lift the immunity of that official," Gallegos says. "If the country denies to lift immunity, we can and have asked them to leave the U.S."
Gallegos says the State Department has asked some diplomats to leave the United States because of domestic abuse. He wouldn't say how many.
But lawyers and human-rights workers argue that the State Department should narrow its stance on the scope of diplomatic immunity. That would allow more accused wrongdoers to be held liable for their actions and be prosecuted in a U.S. court of law.
John Miller recently retired as the State Department's top official on human trafficking. He agrees that the agency should redefine diplomatic immunity, and argues that it could go one step further: by rescinding the special class of visas the United States created for the personal servants of foreign diplomats. The State Department issued 1,957 of these "personal servant" visas last year.
"Why do we even have these visas for domestic servants for diplomats?" Miller asks. "When our diplomats go abroad, they don't require visas to take Americans to do domestic work."
Miller says foreign diplomats should simply hire Americans for their domestic work. Abolishing the special servant visas, he says, would eliminate the whole diplomatic dilemma.
No country in the world has done more than the United States to combat modern forms of slavery and human trafficking, says State Department spokesman Gonzalo Gallegos.
"The U.S. government commits about $400 million a year trying to put an end to this," he says. "It's a core basis of this administration."
Gallegos says whenever there's evidence that a foreign diplomat in the United States has enslaved a domestic servant, the State Department encourages victims to come forward and have their claims investigated.
He says there have been cases in which the State Department has asked diplomats to leave the United States because of domestic abuse. He would not say how many. NPR heard of three possible cases from government sources.
But it might be more likely that the U.S. government deals with diplomatic slavery cases more often by compensating the servant — while letting the diplomat go free.
In a number of cases — it's not clear how many — the U.S. government has designated servants of foreign diplomats as victims of human trafficking ... even when U.S. authorities don't prosecute the diplomat for a crime.
Officially Recognized as Victims
In the United States, being designated a victim of human trafficking can carry profound, life-changing benefits. Trafficking victims can qualify for cash assistance, medical care, food stamps and housing.
Among those designated by the U.S. government as victims of human trafficking: Three Indian women whose story was recounted by NPR's Frank Langfitt. The women are currently suing their former employer, a Kuwaiti diplomat, for allegedly holding them as domestic slaves in his suburban Washington, D.C., home. All three women have won specials visas reserved for trafficking victims.
Those visas allow them to remain in the United States legally and apply to bring their families to America, too. Eventually, trafficking victims and their families can apply to become permanent U.S. residents.
Their status as trafficking victims means the government investigates the diplomat. But it does not mean the government prosecutes.
A Contract of Virtual Slavery
The State Department's Gallegos says the problem of diplomats abusing domestic servants is a rare occurrence. But no one really knows how rare.
Last year, the State Department issued 1,957 visas for personal servants of diplomats. Some diplomats bring in two or even three servants. The dirty little secret is: No one tracks them once they're here.
The State Department does require an employment contract between the diplomat and the servant.
"Well, there's that contract, and there's the real contract," says Suzanne Tomatore, an immigration lawyer in New York.
She and others who have defended diplomatic servants say the real contract can be virtual slavery: Working 16 hours a day, at less than $1 an hour, with no time off. Passports are often withheld.
No one at the State Department checks to see if a diplomatic employer is abiding by the official contract, even though the contract is required for a diplomat to obtain a servant's visa. That means that when a diplomat ignores the contract, it's really visa fraud — a crime against the United States, says Washington lawyer Thomas Connell.
Connell is working pro bono in a lawsuit against an Argentine diplomat. A former servant has accused the diplomat of bringing her into the United States under false pretenses, lying about her contract and paying her about $1.60 per hour. That violates U.S. labor laws.
The Immunity Shield
Connell says the State Department has created a "very unfair situation" by creating rights for diplomatic servants with no way to enforce them. The State Department's Gallegos says the government expects diplomats to abide by the laws of the United States.
But in the case against the Argentine diplomat, the State Department recently argued that when a diplomat hires a domestic servant, his actions are shielded by diplomatic immunity.
Connell says the State Department's broad interpretation of diplomatic immunity is the problem. He says it encourages some diplomats to lie to get their workers into the United States, then pay a pittance once the workers arrive.
He says that ignoring such immigration fraud is shocking — especially in a post-Sept. 11 world.