FDA Weighs Safety Of Bisphenol A A new study says people with high amounts of bisphenol A in their urine were more than twice as likely to be diagnosed with diabetes or heart disease. The study's author was at a Food and Drug Administration meeting Tuesday on BPA's safety.
NPR logo

FDA Weighs Safety Of Bisphenol A

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/94680753/94680725" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
FDA Weighs Safety Of Bisphenol A

FDA Weighs Safety Of Bisphenol A

FDA Weighs Safety Of Bisphenol A

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/94680753/94680725" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

A new study says people with high amounts of bisphenol A in their urine were more than twice as likely to be diagnosed with diabetes or heart disease. The study's author was at a Food and Drug Administration meeting Tuesday on BPA's safety.


A new development today in the matter of whether Bisphenol A, or BPA, is safe. BPA is a chemical commonly used in food containers and bottles. A new study suggests that people exposed to lots of BPA are more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes and heart disease. The study was published this morning in the journal of the American Medical Association just as the FDA convened a meeting on whether it should reassess the chemical. The FDA has said BPA is safe. NPR's Allison Aubrey was at that meeting, and she joins us now in the studio. Allison, first of all, tell us more about this study. What was discussed at this FDA meeting?

ALLISON AUBREY: Well, at the FDA meeting the author of the paper was actually there, so he presented a summary of his analysis to the FDA committee, the subcommittee. And most of them hadn't seen the paper, hadn't had time to review it. The main finding of this paper is that in a study of about 1,400 adults, people who had high amounts of BPA in their urine were more than twice as likely to have been diagnosed with diabetes or heart disease, and that's compared to those who had the lowest level in their urine.

So it's a significant finding because it's a human study, albeit a snapshot in time. Now, I should say that it does not prove a cause and effect, but the studies the FDA has been relying on to determine whether the amount of BPA in food containers is safe, these are animal studies. So, yes, this is a significant study.

NORRIS: Now, as we've said, the FDA has said that BPA is safe. Tell us more about their position and how they came to that position.

AUBREY: OK. Well, the whole reason they called the meeting today is that they wanted to discuss their draft proposal that's on the table now for reassessing the safe limits for BPA in food containers. Now, what the draft concludes is that there's already an adequate margin of safety at current levels of exposure. So, they're basically arguing that they don't need to change what's called - and this is going to be sounding like bureaucratic acronyms, and it is - but the NOAEL limit. And that stands for the No Observed Adverse Effect Limit, or bad effect limit. So, the committee is being asked to weigh in on whether they agree with this assessment.

NORRIS: Now, does this new paper out today change things, the reassessing against that NOAEL limit?

AUBREY: That's right. Well, it really remains to be seen. So, the subcommittee has now about six weeks until October 31st to look at the draft proposal, weigh in. And some of them began to tip their hands a little bit at the meeting by asking why the draft proposal didn't include one study or the other, why it relied on just a few studies. Many of the independent scientists at the meeting today and some policy advocates who spoke publicly were very, very critical. They said the FDA is relying mostly on industry-funded studies and ignoring other new studies, some of which have been published in peer review journals. And the one today is a good example. One FDA official at the meeting, Laura Tarantino, defended the proposal that the FDA has on the table. She basically said, you know, of course the FDA will continue to look at new evidence as it comes in, even if it is not part of this official draft.

NORRIS: Allison, a question that will take us out of the meeting into people's kitchens and living rooms and, perhaps, the nursery. A lot of consumers are worried about using baby bottles, other containers that have BPA in them. Where does this leave those people?

AUBREY: Well, a couple of points to make here. If you're concerned about exposure, keep in mind that the most substantial exposure does come through these food containers. The National Toxicology panel recommends not microwaving food in plastics because the chemical compounds can leach and the degree of leaching really depends on temperature. So, also, they're recommending not dishwashing or using harsh detergents because repeated exposure to the high temperatures of a dishwasher can deteriorate the plastic and release the BPA.

Now, in some cases, industry has just moved ahead and eliminated BPA. Nalgene has stopped using BPA in its bottles and sells BPA-free ones. And if you look around in stores like Toys R Us or Wal-Mart, you're beginning to see, you know, products that are marketed as BPA-free. There's baby bottles and other children's products...

NORRIS: You see it right there on the label.

AUBREY: That's right.

NORRIS: Just quickly, before I let you go. How do you know, if you don't see that label, if a container or product has BPA in it?

AUBREY: It's a really good question, and there is no way to be certain. It's obviously not listed as a food ingredient, it's not labeled. It is widely distributed and pretty ubiquitous.

NORRIS: Allison, thank you very much.

AUBREY: Thank you.

NORRIS: That's NPR's Allison Aubrey.

Copyright © 2008 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Study Finds Link Between Plastics Chemical, Disease

Study Finds Link Between Plastics Chemical, Disease

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/94662514/94667068" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

Water bottles made with the controversial carbonate plastic bisphenol A, or BPA. David McNew/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption
David McNew/Getty Images

Q&A: How Am I Affected?

Where is BPA found?

The National Toxicology Program says the main source of human exposure to bisphenol A, or BPA, is the tiny amounts that leach from Nalgene-type polycarbonate water bottles and from metal cans — that could include canned vegetables and fruits — lined with an epoxy resin that contains BPA. The chemical is also found in baby bottles, tableware and food storage containers.

Does BPA cause health problems?

Studies about the effects of BPA have been conflicting. Some animal studies have suggested a link between BPA and effects on the brain, behavior and the prostate gland — and raised concerns about the effects of exposure on the developing fetus and young children. But there are no conclusive studies linking BPA to human health problems.

It's also unclear what determines how much leaching occurs. It may depend on the temperature of the liquid or bottle or how the plastic is reused.

What should I avoid?

To minimize exposure to BPA, the National Toxicology Program recommends that people avoid microwaving plastic food containers or washing them in the dishwasher with harsh detergents. Repeated exposure to high temperatures and harsh cleaning agents can deteriorate the plastic and release BPA.

Additionally, some sources, such as NTP, have advised consumers to avoid hard, clear plastic containers with the No. 7 on the bottom. While the chemical industry maintains that plastic bottles contain little BPA and leach trace amounts too low to be harmful to humans, some companies have voluntarily elected to sell BPA-free products. Nalgene sells BPA-free water bottles, and retailers such as Toys R Us and Wal-Mart offer baby bottles and other children's products that are BPA-free.

— Kathleen Masterson

A new study could change the debate over the safety of bisphenol A, a compound found in many plastics.

It suggests that there is an association between higher exposures to BPA and the development of heart disease and diabetes.

The study, appearing in this week's Journal of the American Medical Association, finds that adults with the highest levels of BPA in their urine were more than twice as likely to report having diabetes or heart disease — compared with adults with the lowest levels of the chemical in their urine.

Though it brings up new possible human health risks, the study, which is being discussed today at a meeting of the Food and Drug Administration's science advisory board, offers no conclusive answers. It does not prove a cause and effect between use of plastic food containers and the development of diabetes or heart disease.

"We don't have a lot of evidence in people about the effects of BPA. This is one of the first studies, and it finds something disturbing. It's suggesting there may be harm in adults, which we didn't really believe based on the animal studies," says David Schardt, a staff scientist with the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

The study uses data drawn from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey — a survey conducted by the federal government — isolating a group of adults between the ages of 18 and 74 who are representative of the U.S. population at large. The survey asked a series of health-related questions, and participants provided a urine sample. Researchers then tested the urine samples for a range of compounds, including bisphenol A.

"We were interested in diseases of the 50 and older age group and that's originally what we looked at. And then we realized that these associations went into the larger adult populations. And it just turned out that these signals were exceptionally strong and exceptionally robust," says David Melzer, the study's director and professor of epidemiology and public health at Peninsula Medical School in England.

The researchers adjusted for things like weight and smoking, but the association between high BPA urine levels and likelihood of having the diseases held.

"If you could take two individuals with same sex, race, age, ethnicity, body build, cigarette smoking status, and had one individual that [had] low levels of BPA and one individual that had high levels of BPA, the individual with high levels of BPA would be more likely to also report being a diabetic or having cardiovascular disease history," says Ken Portier, a statistician with the American Cancer Society and an expert at interpreting these kinds of snapshot-in-time studies.

Portier says the findings are certainly strong enough to merit follow-up, and the next step might be to look at another group of the survey participants and see if the associations hold up.

Melzer is scheduled to discuss his findings today at a Food and Drug Administration meeting where the agency has issued a draft proposal on bisphenol A.

At this time, the FDA finds the current level of exposure to BPA through food containers safe.

Correction Sept. 17, 2008

In some versions of this interview, we mistakenly said 7 pounds of bisphenol A (BPA) are manufactured each year. The correct figure is 7 billion pounds.