Will The Bailout Bill Pass In The House This Time? Lawmakers in the House of Representatives are expected to vote Friday on a revised Wall Street rescue bill. Lawmakers there rejected the plan Monday by 23 votes. The Senate passed a modified version of the package Wednesday. Now some House members will have to become vote switchers, a label no one likes, in order for the bill to pass.
NPR logo

Will The Bailout Bill Pass In The House This Time?

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/95329936/95329897" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Will The Bailout Bill Pass In The House This Time?

Will The Bailout Bill Pass In The House This Time?

Will The Bailout Bill Pass In The House This Time?

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/95329936/95329897" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

Lawmakers in the House of Representatives are expected to vote Friday on a revised Wall Street rescue bill. Lawmakers there rejected the plan Monday by 23 votes. The Senate passed a modified version of the package Wednesday. Now some House members will have to become vote switchers, a label no one likes, in order for the bill to pass.

ARI SHAPIRO, host:

This is Morning Edition from NPR News. I'm Ari Shapiro.

RENEE MONTAGNE, host:

And I'm Renee Montagne. Good morning. The arm-twisting and vote-counting and button holing are nearly over. Today, the House of Representatives plans to take up the massive financial bailout package again. The House rejected it Monday. But now that the Senate approved a modified version, House leaders believe they have the votes to pass it this time. And that means some lawmakers face having John Kerry syndrome, voting against the bill before they vote for it. NPR's Brian Naylor spoke with some of those vote switchers.

BRIAN NAYLOR: It's not often that members of Congress vote one way on Monday and are then asked to change course come Friday. Congressional leaders usually work to protect their members from such awkward pirouettes, but today is different. The original bailout bill lost by 23 votes on Monday. Since then, the stock market has tumbled, gained ground and tumbled again. The credit markets have tightened some more. And some lawmakers, encouraged by their leaders, have had second thoughts about their no votes - like Missouri Democrat Emanuel Cleaver, who says he's worried about what he's been hearing since Monday.

Representative EMANUEL CLEAVER (Democrat, Missouri): I concluded that there are some very, very smart people who believe that the failure for Congress to act would result in a cataclysm. There are 800 bridges in the state of Missouri in need of repair or replacement, and the state right now is unable to get cheap financing that would enable them to do the project.

NAYLOR: Cleaver says Kansas City, which he led as mayor for eight years, can't get bonds sold for a water and sewer project, and he's worried about the Ford plant in town, too. Shelley Berkeley, a Democrat who represents Las Vegas, has heard similar concerns. Berkeley, one of the 95 Democrats who voted no on Monday, today plans to vote yes.

Representative SHELLEY BERKELEY (Democrat, Nevada): I heard from everyone from my gaming industry to my card dealers, builders, developers, restaurateurs, that they needed some relief, and it translated in a very meaningful way to me to the people that I represent.

NAYLOR: The bill approved by the Senate and before the House today differs from the original measure negotiated by congressional leaders and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. It's been sweetened, in the jargon of Congress. One of the sweeteners that helped changed Berkeley's mind is the package of tax cuts that the Senate attached. Among them is an extension of the tax credit for alternative energy sources like solar and wind, which are important to Nevada's burgeoning renewable-energy industry. Still, she says the rescue plan is a roll of the dice.

Rep. BERKELEY: I sure hope Mr. Paulson knows what he's doing because there's a lot riding on his good judgment.

NAYLOR: Zach Wamp of Tennessee was one of the 133 Republicans who voted no on Monday. Now he says he'll vote yes, changing his mind in part after the Senate more than doubled the level of bank deposits that the FDIC will ensure. Wamp says he's worried about the economic conditions in his district.

Representative ZACH WAMP (Republican, Tennessee): I'm from southeast Tennessee, where gasoline is not available right now. You got to go to seven stations to find gas. It happened to me this week. The anxiety level is through the roof.

NAYLOR: Wamp, like other members since Monday, has heard from banks and colleges in his district worried about the availability of college loans and credit for business in farms.

Rep. WAMP: Major institutions in East Tennessee called me this week and said, our pensions are at risk. If the market and the confidence continues to erode and there's no money available and businesses are laying people off, we're not going to be able to honor our pension obligations. Well, at some point you have to say the ox is in the ditch. Let's break the rules and get the ox out of the ditch or our country, which leads the world, will not be leading the world. And the rest of the world is calling, too.

NAYLOR: But, says Wamp, there will be little reward if the financial rescue plan wins approval today. He says half of the voters in his district are already mad at him from Monday's vote. And after today, the other half will be as well. Brian Naylor, NPR News, the Capitol.

Copyright © 2008 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Bush Signs $700 Billion Financial Bailout Bill

House Minority Leader John Boehner (left) and Minority Whip Roy Blunt emerge from a House Republican meeting on the financial bailout package Friday. Alex Wong/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption
Alex Wong/Getty Images

House Minority Leader John Boehner (left) and Minority Whip Roy Blunt emerge from a House Republican meeting on the financial bailout package Friday.

Alex Wong/Getty Images

President Bush signed a $700 billion financial bailout package Friday, shortly after the U.S. House passed the rescue measure, in a vote of 263-171. The action paved the way for the government to start buying up troubled assets from financial institutions caught on the wrong side of record home foreclosures.

"I know some Americans have reservations about this legislation. ... In this situation, action is clearly necessary, and ultimately the cost to taxpayers will be far less than the initial outlay," the president said after the House action.

He said it would take some time for the legislation to have its full effect on the economy.

"There were moments this week when some thought that the federal government could not rise to the challenge. But thanks to the hard work of members of both parties, in both houses, and the spirit of cooperation between Capitol Hill and my administration, we completed this bill in a timely manner," he said in remarks in the Rose Garden.

The House had rejected a similar bill on Monday, causing the Dow Jones industrial average to plummet almost 800 points. The Senate approved a revised version earlier this week, sending it back to the House for another try.

For more than a week, investor sentiment has been revolving around the twin suns of Capitol Hill and Wall Street. Investors had already factored the vote into share prices, and that's part of the reason the stock market moved sideways after the vote.

The Dow had been up about 200 points Friday morning but began a slide after the vote, with investors apparently showing concern that the economy is still in for a rough ride. The Dow was down by 157 points at the close of trading. Analysts say investors are assuming a recession is in the offing and expect the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates to blunt that downturn.

The 450-page bill gives the government the unprecedented authority to buy troubled assets on Wall Street's balance sheets. It contains provisions favored by House Republicans, including $149 billion in tax breaks, a higher limit on federal bank deposit insurance and changes in securities law.

It also restates securities regulators' authority to suspend asset-valuing rules that corporate executives blame for fueling the crisis. The Senate approved the bill Wednesday, 74-25.

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) voted against the bill. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson "pulled the fire alarm and cried fire, fire from the roof," she said on CNBC shortly before the vote. The Senate's version of the bailout bill is nothing more than a dressed-up version of what she voted against Monday, Bachmann said.

"This doesn't address the fundamental problem of the credit crisis," she said. "Coming down the road for the next few years, we may rue the day that this passed."

Credit Markets Remain Tight

The credit markets have been nonplused by all of this activity in Washington. Banks that have cash aren't lending it. The cost of borrowing dollars in London has been rising and shows little sign of easing. The London Interbank Offer Rate is considered a good barometer of how much banks trust — or don't trust — each other. And right now banks have determined they aren't willing to risk lending out their cash because they might not get it back. Their wariness is not misplaced. European and U.S. governments have had to rescue five banks in the past week alone.

Because of the tight lending conditions, banks and institutional firms are going to the Fed to get cash. Commercial banks averaged $44.5 billion in daily borrowing over the past week — up from a little more than $39 billion a week earlier, the central reported Thursday.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger told U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson in a letter Thursday that the state may need to turn to the federal government for short-term borrowing if conditions in the credit market don't improve soon. California usually borrows money this time of year to pay for the state's basic operating expenses and then repays the loans after tax revenues begin pouring in the following spring.

"Absent a clear resolution to this financial crisis that restores confidence and liquidity to the credit markets, California and other states may be unable to obtain the necessary level of financing to maintain government operations and may be forced to turn to the Federal Treasury for short-term financing," the governor wrote.

Investment firms are facing the same dilemma. They drew almost $148 billion for the week ended Wednesday, compared with just $88 billion the previous week. Commercial banks often go to the Fed to get loan privileges so they can cover their reserve requirements. Back in March, as it scrambled to avoid a market meltdown, the Fed gave investment houses permission to do that, too. This is the broadest use of the central bank's lending power since the Great Depression.

Reports Show Economy Weakening

While watching the unfolding events in the House, investors are having to digest a litany of doomcasting reports that seem to indicate the economy is headed for recession. The Labor Department said employers slashed 159,000 jobs from their payrolls in September, the most in five years.

That news comes on the heels of two other gloomy reports Thursday: Weekly jobless claims reached a seven-year high, and factory orders fell 4 percent in August, a full percentage point worse than economists had forecast. Adding insult to injury, the Mortgage Bankers Association said U.S. foreclosures in the second quarter rose to a record 2.75 percent of all mortgages issued that quarter.

Investors are also focusing on how the U.S. Treasury is going to administer the program. Analysts said that until the Treasury explains how it will buy and sell the toxic debt, the nervousness will continue.

"Once the legislation is signed, we're going to be going out and lining up some advisers from the private sector," Paulson told reporters. "There are a wide variety of tools that we have that come with this legislation, and which combined with the other authorities we have ... are going to be very important in protecting the stability of the financial markets, which ultimately protect the economic security of the American people."

Indeed, the Treasury will have to walk a fine line. On one hand, there is concern that the Treasury will buy the debt at such bargain-basement prices that it will hurt the banks rather than help them. Or, if the Treasury just gives the banks the price that the market would give them right now, it raises the question of why the government needs to be involved in the first place.

What seems clear is that the rules governing the financial industry will be under scrutiny when the new Congress returns next year.

"Starting in January ... we have to rewrite how to finance in America," House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) said after the vote. "It would be highly irresponsible, a betrayal of our oath to stop here. ... Now we have to perform more serious reform and it will be our job to enact a set of regulations for all of the financial industry."