Report: WMD Attack Likely By 2013 A new intelligence report warns that without drastic new measures, the international community faces the real prospect of a nuclear or biological attack by 2013. The panel that issued the report has briefed vice president-elect Joe Biden on its contents.
NPR logo

Report: WMD Attack Likely By 2013

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Report: WMD Attack Likely By 2013

Report: WMD Attack Likely By 2013

Report: WMD Attack Likely By 2013

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

A new intelligence report warns that without drastic new measures, the international community faces the real prospect of a nuclear or biological attack by 2013. The panel that issued the report has briefed vice president-elect Joe Biden on its contents.


From NPR News, this is All Things Considered. I'm Michele Norris.


And I'm Melissa Block. Today, Vice President-elect Joe Biden was briefed on a new report about terrorists getting their hands on weapons of mass destruction. The bipartisan report was requested by Congress. It predicts there could be a terrorist attack with a nuclear or more likely a biological weapon in the next five years. NPR's Michele Kelemen reports.

MICHELE KELEMEN: Authors of the report say they didn't want to frighten Americans, but former Florida Senator Bob Graham, a Democrat, certainly came up with a rather alarming headline for the report issued today.

BOB GRAHAM: It is more likely than not that a weapon of mass destruction will be used someplace in the world prior to the end of the year 2013.

KELEMEN: And he said that the weapon would more likely be biological rather than nuclear. That's an issue Jim Talent, a former Republican senator from Missouri, emphasized at today's news conference.

JIM TALENT: We're trying to raise a visibility in the mind of policymakers and the public as well of the danger of this threat. It is - the terrorists are organizationally sophisticated enough to get either the nuclear or bioweapons. But the bioweapon would be even easier for them to get and then to weaponize.

KELEMEN: Experts say that it's hard to back up estimates like these. David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security, says they were simply judgment calls of the commissioners.

DAVID ALBRIGHT: They fall back on this better-than-even chance and numbers that are hard to - I personally feel it would be hard to defend technically. But they know if they put out those numbers, it'll get everyone's attention. And then that'll lead to greater action, which is really the intention of this commission.

KELEMEN: The advice on the nuclear front is fairly conventional: strengthening the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, staying tough on Iran and North Korea, and continuing efforts to safeguard nuclear material around the globe. Tom Inglesby, who's deputy director for biosecurity at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, says trying to lock down biological material is much harder.

TOM INGLESBY: Given that pathogens are in laboratories big and small around the world and given, as they say in the report, that it doesn't require any more than a few skilled individuals to make and use a biological weapon, our efforts to prevent biological attack should be strengthened, but the country can't bank on prevention as its sole strategy.

KELEMEN: He says the government and public health agencies need to get far more prepared. President-elect Barack Obama has shown a lot of interest in this area, and he is expected to take the advice of the bipartisan commission and appoint a top official at the White House to coordinate government efforts to keep weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of terrorists. The report is also encouraging him to pay close attention to Pakistan. Commission member Tim Roemer, a former congressman from Indiana, says the group was forced to cancel a trip to Pakistan this fall.

TIM ROEMER: We were hours away from the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad when the terrorists hit it. That was a near miss for this commission and for its members, but certainly a signal that Pakistan - when you're looking at the confluence of terrorism and proliferation, all roads lead to Pakistan.

KELEMEN: And the recent rampage in India, an attack India blamed on terrorists from Pakistan, is once again raising tensions in the region. Michele Kelemen, NPR News, Washington.

Copyright © 2008 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Report: Terrorists Could Use WMD By 2013

It is "more likely than not" that a weapon of mass destruction — specifically a biological weapon that could include something like the deadly anthrax bacteria — will be used in a terrorist attack by the end of 2013.

That's the conclusion of a high-powered commission created by Congress, which has just released its report, titled "World at Risk."

The commission, chaired by retired Democratic Sen. Bob Graham, says the report is meant to neither frighten nor reassure Americans, but emphasize that the U.S. government is not doing enough to adapt to the growing risk of weapons of mass destruction.

The commission says the risks are growing faster than the government's defenses. The margin of safety, its members say, is shrinking, not growing.

Biological Attack More Likely

The commission focused on nuclear and biological weapons, saying they posed the "greatest evil." But since there are more controls on both nuclear weapons and materials, the commission says the threat of a biological terror attack is more likely than a nuclear one.

The U.S. government has focused its efforts on reducing nuclear proliferation — including securing Russian sites — the report says. But federal officials have placed too little emphasis on prevention of a biological attack.

"In many areas, we have improved the security of the nation," Graham said in a news conference. "However, while that has been occurring, there have also been changes in the environment in which we are operating, particularly as it relates to biological weapons, which have made them more accessible to potential terrorists."

Jim Talent, a former Republican senator and a commission member, echoed those concerns.

"The terrorists could acquire the biological capabilities, or they could convince biological scientists to become terrorists and then get the capability right away," he said. "So we know they want to do it."

Biological Stockpiles Not Adequately Secured

In the U.S. and other countries, laboratories that hold samples of biological materials — such as anthrax and botulinum toxin — are not adequately secured and therefore vulnerable to theft, the report says.

The commission came up with a number of recommendations, including better security at labs that house such biological pathogens, and an international conference to discuss ways to better prevent theft and proliferation.

Talent said the report is meant to spur the government to act.

"We say to the government, 'Look, you need to ... be more aggressive in trying to prevent it; in particular, by building a culture of accountability and a partnership with the life science community, reforming how we regulate the high-containment labs, where they work on these kinds of pathogens, and have a single agency responsible,' " Talent said.

Donald A. Henderson, a biosecurity expert who has advised the federal government and who is now a resident scholar at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, says the report does not break fresh ground.

"The report is just out, and I have scanned it. ... However, I saw nothing new," Henderson said in an e-mail response to questions from NPR. "The report indicates that more needs to be done in terms of preparedness, but this has been said before. The mystery is why they focused on 2013? My guess is that it is five years hence, and giving a year rather than stating 'within the next five years' made it seem stronger and would give the report an added element of interest."

Worries Over Anthrax

For years, especially just before the Iraq war, the American military in particular was worried about weaponized anthrax.

Anthrax spores can easily be spread over a wide area and be inhaled by troops, the surest route to infection. Tests have shown that enough anthrax to fill two sugar packets could drift over 250 kilometers in optimum conditions, while the same amount of botulinum would travel only a half-kilometer.

U.S. troops were vaccinated against anthrax before heading into Iraq in 2003, and also wore protective suits to guard against other types of biological or chemical weapons.

Over the past several years, the Bush administration has increased spending for chemical and biological defense, including new detection devices and enhanced protection against threats such as anthrax.

Graham said he has met with the congressional leadership about the report and expects they will be "active partners in achieving the goals of these recommendations. So I am very pleased with the initial reception by the people who appointed us."

Separately, congressional lawmakers and staff say the federal government will recommend a site in Kansas for a new $450 million laboratory to study biological threats like anthrax and foot-and-mouth disease.

The Department of Homeland Security's choice of Manhattan, Kan., beat out intense competition from other sites in Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina and Texas.

Related NPR Stories