Proposed OSHA Cuts Spotlight Regulatory Debate Congressional Republicans, promising to scrub the government for "job killing" regulations, have focused on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Its chief says the GOP's proposed 20 percent budget cut would be devastating to OSHA's mission: worker safety.
NPR logo

OSHA Budget Cut Plan Spotlights Regulatory Debate

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/134177079/134177054" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
OSHA Budget Cut Plan Spotlights Regulatory Debate

OSHA Budget Cut Plan Spotlights Regulatory Debate

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/134177079/134177054" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

MICHELE NORRIS, Host:

NPR's Brian Naylor has the story.

BRIAN NAYLOR: OSHA administrator David Michaels.

NORRIS: The Republicans have proposed a 20 percent cut and given half the year's over, that really means a 40 percent cut. It would really have a devastating effect on all of our activities.

NAYLOR: Peg Seminario, the safety and health director of the AFL-CIO, agrees. She says the Republicans' proposed cuts would diminish the agency's staffing and abilities.

NORRIS: We now have a much bigger workforce than we had 40 years ago when OSHA was started. But they would propose to slash the agency, slash enforcement, slash standards-setting, leaving the agency essentially crippled and unable to do its job to protect workers.

NAYLOR: Republicans argue that OSHA's stepped-up enforcement threatens jobs. At a recent hearing on the issue, the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Workforce Protections, Michigan Republican Tim Walberg, questioned the agency's priorities.

NORRIS: Over the last two years, OSHA has not only attempted to implement several policy changes that would have profound impact on the workplace, it has become an administration more focused on punishment than prevention. Our goal should be to prevent workplace accidents before they happen, not simply shame an employer once a tragedy has occurred on the job site.

NAYLOR: Joe Trauger, a vice president at the National Association of Manufacturers, calls the recording proposal problematic.

NORRIS: It's very difficult for an employer to discern whether or not an injury actually occurred in the workplace or if it occurred outside the workplace. Because the definitions were expanded to such a degree that if a person felt like they had a muscle soreness, that would be a reportable incident. Well, it may not have anything to do with what actually happens in the workplace.

NAYLOR: Michaels at OSHA says the repetitive motion proposal has been misunderstood and that the agency has decided to further explain the requirement before implementing it. He says the agency always looks at the cost of complying with its rules and invites comments on its proposals before implementing them. He says OSHA can protect jobs and workers at the same time.

NORRIS: We believe we can do both. We know that OSHA doesn't kill jobs. It stops jobs from killing workers. When employers embrace safety, they actually save money.

NAYLOR: Brian Naylor, NPR News, Washington.

Copyright © 2011 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.