Nuclear Reactor Redesigns Aim To Allay Safety Fears Japan's nuclear crisis has raised fears about nuclear power around the world, including in the U.S. But advocates of nuclear power say new technology could allay many of those fears. It's possible to build reactors that are much less vulnerable to a meltdown — even if they're abandoned in an emergency.
NPR logo

Nuclear Reactor Redesigns Aim To Allay Safety Fears

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/134615077/134615040" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Nuclear Reactor Redesigns Aim To Allay Safety Fears

Nuclear Reactor Redesigns Aim To Allay Safety Fears

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/134615077/134615040" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

LINDA WERTHEIMER, Host:

As the people of Japan are finding out, you cannot just turn off a nuclear reactor and walk away. But what if you could? As NPR's Martin Kaste reports, some nuclear power advocates say new reactor designs are getting closer to the goal of so-called walk-away safety.

MARTIN KASTE: Nuclear reactors are like toddlers: as much as you'd like to, you can't leave them alone. But why can't we build a reactor that's a little more self-sufficient?

PER PETERSON: Certainly it's technically possible to do that.

KASTE: Per Peterson is the chair of the department of nuclear engineering at Berkeley. He says, some newer designs use what's called passive safety features. For instance, the Westinghouse AP-1000. Like most reactors, it uses water to cool its fuel, but that cooling system doesn't require anybody at the controls.

PETERSON: You should be able to walk away for 72 hours with no intervention. And then at 72 hours the intervention is to come in and refill a pool of water, which would something you could do in many different ways, such as say just with a fire truck.

KASTE: But the promise of passive safety doesn't convince Edwin Lyman, a physicist at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

EDWIN LYMAN: The idea is, you know, it's too good to be true.

KASTE: For instance, he says, the AP-1000 relies on gravity to move water through the core - and he's not sure that's good enough.

LYMAN: Gravity is just not as strong a driving force as you can achieve with a pump. And when you're dealing with an emergency situation that we're certainly seeing here at the Fukushima, it's not all that easy to be able to reliably inject water into a reactor vessel that's having a crisis.

KASTE: At Idaho National Laboratory, David Petti directs research into this design. He says a loss of primary cooling in one of these reactors would be un-dramatic.

DAVID PETTI: The graphite just heats and heats, and then the vessel - the heat off the edge of the vessel starts to increase and the fuel temperature peaks and then starts to come down.

KASTE: Still, Petti says, compared to water-cooled reactors, the pebble-bed design is more forgiving.

PETTI: These accidents would take four days, five days to evolve. So it's a very slow, sluggish system, unlike some of the other reactor technologies where things happen more quickly.

KASTE: Martin Kaste, NPR News.

Copyright © 2011 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.