Big Political Donors Shy Away From Public Scrutiny Some donors willing to write seven-figure checks to superPACs have gotten something they weren't counting on: attention from the political opposition and the media. One donor says he feels like he has a "target strapped on my back."
NPR logo

Big Political Donors Shy Away From Public Scrutiny

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Big Political Donors Shy Away From Public Scrutiny

Big Political Donors Shy Away From Public Scrutiny

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


This is MORNING EDITION from NPR News. I'm Linda Wertheimer.


And I'm Renee Montagne.

There are several dozen wealthy donors taking advantage of what might be called a post-Citizens United world, writing seven-figure checks to political superPACs. NPR has been profiling these contributors in our series Million Dollar Donors. And it hasn't been easy. It turns out those wealthy donors are not so generous with their thoughts about why they're writing those checks. NPR's Andrea Seabrook reports.

ANDREA SEABROOK, BYLINE: It seems there's something wealthy donors weren't counting on when they wrote those checks - attracting attention. Attention from the political opposition, attention from the media.

FRANK VANDERSLOOT: There has been a ton of so-called electronic media journalists that have lodged all kinds of innuendo in my direction, accused me of all kinds of bad things.

SEABROOK: Frank VanderSloot wrote checks totaling $1 million to the superPAC supporting Mitt Romney. Actually, the money came through his company, Melaleuca, which uses Amway-style marketing to sell cleaning products.

Any superPAC donor who gives more than $200 has to be reported to the Federal Election Commission, and that's released to the public. That's how journalists found out about his big donation and began looking into VanderSloot. And that's how the Obama campaign got his name, too. On a website titled Keeping GOP Honest, the Obama campaign posted a list of big donors to the pro-Romney superPAC, including VanderSloot. That, he told Fox News really took him by surprise.

VANDERSLOOT: That really worried me at first, I'll tell you. And my first anticipation was that, yeah, I've got a target strapped to my back. And sure enough, then the attacks started coming, and I really thought I'd made a mistake.

SEABROOK: VanderSloot says he's gotten negative press, received unsavory emails and lost customers.

Charles and David Koch say they've been targets of attacks, too. The brothers are high-dollar contributors to conservative nonprofit groups also running ads in the presidential race. Though, because their donations are going to so-called social welfare organizations, the contributions remain secret.

The Koch brothers' spokesman, Mark Holden, talked to Martin Bashir on MSNBC.


MARK HOLDEN: That has led to death threats against our owners. Charles and David Koch have received phone death threats. They've received email death threats, Internet death threats. This is where this leads. It's irresponsible.

SEABROOK: The top Republican in the U.S. Senate, Mitch McConnell, says the problem has gotten so bad it's infringing on these donors right to free speech.

SENATOR MITCH MCCONNELL: This is nothing less than an effort by the government itself to expose its critics to harassment and intimidation.

SEABROOK: McConnell spoke at the conservative think tank the American Enterprise Institute. In his speech he said, if donors are giving to independent superPACs or to those social welfare groups, they shouldn't be forced into the public eye by campaign disclosure laws.

MCCONNELL: And that's why it's critically important for all conservatives and, indeed, all Americans, to stand up and unite in defense of the freedom to organize around the causes we believe in.

SEABROOK: To which, Norm Ornstein, also of the American Enterprise Institute, responds...

NORM ORNSTEIN: The fact that you get negative press coverage because you have decided to get involved in politics is, as Justice Scalia said, a part of the price of democracy and getting involved.

SEABROOK: Ornstein says those donors had to have known their names would be public and they chose to contribute. The fact that they don't want to talk about it now, he says, doesn't make much sense.

Now, NPR's political reporters contacted many wealthy contributors for this Million Dollar Donors series. Not one of them would speak on tape. For this story, we again attempted to contact those donors to ask why they turned us down for the first interviews. No response on that either.

ORNSTEIN: Give me some numbers. I'll call them up and find out why they wouldn't talk to you about why they wouldn't talk to you about why they wouldn't talk to you.

SEABROOK: Ornstein says there's a reason journalists and the political opposition are paying attention to these big donors: Voters want to know about them.

ORNSTEIN: If you are judging candidates and making your vote choices based on what you hear, you have got to be able to know who is saying the things that you hear or the things that you see.

SEABROOK: In other words, voters want to know who is trying to influence the election and toward which candidate. And, says Ornstein, writing big checks to groups running political ads is, by definition, trying to influence the election.

Andrea Seabrook, NPR News, Washington.

MONTAGNE: For more on our series Million Dollar Donors, go to

Copyright © 2012 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.