Report On CIA Interrogation Tactics Revives Torture Debate : It's All Politics In a closed-door meeting Thursday, lawmakers will consider whether to approve the report, which human rights groups are pushing to be made public. It's part of an ongoing fight over whether harsh interrogation methods, which critics compared to torture, were effective.
NPR logo

Report On CIA Interrogation Tactics Revives Torture Debate

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Report On CIA Interrogation Tactics Revives Torture Debate

Report On CIA Interrogation Tactics Revives Torture Debate

  • Download
  • <iframe src="" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


The Senate Intelligence Committee is meeting behind closed doors this afternoon to consider whether to approve a secret report. It chronicles CIA detention and interrogation practices, including methods that critics have compared to torture. That report and a big budget spy movie about to come out are rekindling the debate about whether those methods worked.

NPR's Carrie Johnson reports.

CARRIE JOHNSON, BYLINE: California Democrat Dianne Feinstein, who leads the Senate Intelligence panel, told NPR in an email her 6,000-page report is, quote, "comprehensive, strictly factual, and the most definitive review of the CIA program to be conducted." Saxby Chambliss, the top Republican on the committee, has a different view.

SENATOR SAXBY CHAMBLISS: This draft report contains a number of significant errors and omissions about the history and the utility of the CIA's detention and interrogation program. It's really not surprising, given the fact that the review was conducted without interviewing any of the people involved. It was taken solely from written documents.

JOHNSON: Chambliss and several other Republicans on the panel backed away from the investigation and few, if any, of them are expected to vote to approve the report.

DAVID IRVINE: It's entirely possible that a party-line vote would be interpreted in some quarters as just a political statement.

JOHNSON: David Irvine is a retired Army brigadier general who taught junior officers how to interrogate suspects. Irvine, a Republican, thinks a lot more than politics is at stake.

IRVINE: We've been searching for evidence for six years that enhanced interrogation has made the nation safer, and we're still looking.

JOHNSON: Enhanced interrogation. That's the name authorities in the Bush years gave to a series of tough practices: waterboarding, sleep deprivation, forced nudity. Some of those tactics are on display in the new movie "Zero Dark Thirty," about the hunt for Osama bin Laden. In this early scene, a CIA operative is shown getting tough with a detainee.


UNIDENTIFIED MAN: (as character) Can I be honest with you? I am bad news. I'm not your friend. I'm not going to help you. I'm going to break you.

JOHNSON: When President Obama took office, he said he would put an end to the harshest interrogation tactics, which drew some pushback from former Vice President Dick Cheney.

VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY: I don't think we should just roll over when the new administration says - accuses us of committing torture, which we did not, or somehow violating the law, which we did not. I think you need to stand up and respond to that, and that's what I've done.

JOHNSON: Melina Milazzo of Human Rights First.

MELINA MILAZZO: Senator Feinstein has said that this report would show that there is no evidence that torture led to Osama bin Laden's whereabouts or any significant portion of that operation.

JOHNSON: Former Bush intelligence officials disagree but say they can't talk in detail because the information is still classified. That's why human rights groups are pushing for the Senate to make most of the report public as soon as possible. Curt Goering directs the Center for Victims of Torture.

CURT GOERING: Societies are not able to move on until they confront the truth. They can't bury the past. They can't simply move on. There's a process of reckoning with what happened.

JOHNSON: Part of that reckoning, he says, is looking at what was gained from the interrogations and what may have been lost. Tony Camerino conducted 300 interrogations in Iraq.

TONY CAMERINO: As someone much smarter than me once said, if you use coercion, you might get the location of a house. But if you get somebody to cooperate, they'll tell you if it's booby-trapped.

JOHNSON: Camerino opposes the use of harsh tactics and says he'd like to see accountability, such as criminal prosecutions, of the people who employed them. That's unlikely, since a Justice Department investigation into interrogation abuses ended this year with no indictments. But opponents of those methods say they want to keep talking about them, as a reminder for history.

Carrie Johnson, NPR News, Washington.

Copyright © 2012 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.