Tina Brown's Must-Reads — On Media, The People, And Strife The editor of The Daily Beast returns to recommend three compelling reads on the topic of the stories media tell about conflict in the world around them — and the surging force of social media, which increasingly sets the storytelling agenda.
NPR logo

Tina Brown's Must-Reads: On Media, The People, And Strife

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/195233056/195787471" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript
Tina Brown's Must-Reads: On Media, The People, And Strife

Tina Brown's Must-Reads: On Media, The People, And Strife

  • Download
  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/195233056/195787471" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript


And let's travel now with Tina Brown. The editor of the Daily Beast joins us regularly for our feature Word of Mouth. Her recommended readings this time take us to Syria and to China. But first, Turkey and an article that caught her eye in Foreign Affairs magazine. It's about Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and how he's responding to news coverage of the political unrest in his country. The headline: The Turkish Media's Darkest Hour.

TINA BROWN: One of the most tangible outcomes of the protests in Turkey has been to lay bare the full extent to which the Erdogan government there has brought the Turkish media to heel. The fact is that Erdogan has had a terrible record with jailing journalists and suppressing free speech for a long time. This piece tells us that of the 67 jailed journalists, Reporters Without Borders said in an email that a minimum of 33 journalists and two media assistants have been detained for their reporting. The press has been absolutely cowed.

But what happened, of course, in these demonstrations was that social media took over. Social media would not be cowed. And while the mainstream media was absolutely disgracing itself by not covering the riots - and indeed showing footage at one point of a kind of nature broadcast of penguins - social media and Twitter was just alive with the truth of what was happening, which was an enormous amount of protests, unrest, kind of seeds of a revolution being sown.

So that the mainstream media in the end was kind of shamed by social media. And now they, too, are having to think about how they cover all of this and really whether they've been too cowed, which is a very, very good outcome, frankly, for Turkey.

GREENE: Well, what does this tell us, Tina, if we see Prime Minister Erdogan able to cow the traditional media and social media seems to be flourishing?

BROWN: Well, it's very interesting, because, of course, the first thing that Erdogan condemned, one of the first things he condemned, was Twitter. He said, you know, Twitter has caused all this. He's in a rage because he cannot control social media, which is the best thing about social media. But, of course, it also describes how frankly sometimes capitalism and conglomerates can actually be just as much of a suppressor of the free press by sheer self-interest. They want to be in business with the government, and so they don't want to offend Erdogan. So, it really talks about how important it is that this free press be allowed to flourish and how social media has now made mainstream media stiffen its resolve and grow a pair, frankly.

GREENE: Yeah. Interesting, as you say, that self-interested media moguls may be as much a part of the problem here as a repressive regime.

BROWN: Absolutely. Because, you know, self-censorship can be very bad. I mean, people want to get in the government's favor, they want to get contracts. A lot of these big media people own other things, other than newspapers, and the papers really become a kind of mouthpiece of the government, so they can flatter the Erdogan regime and thereby get the other deals that they want. So, this has become a huge tipping point for the press in Turkey. And I'd like to feel that - I think all of us would like to feel that this is a sign of the future, that actually the press will start to protect democracy instead of become a tool of totalitarianism.

GREENE: Let's talk about another regime that's certainly been acting under pressure for months and months now: the conflict in Syria. You were struck by an article by Robert Worth in the New York Times Magazine. The headline: The Price of Loyalty in Syria.

BROWN: Yeah. This is a wonderful piece of writing by Robert Worth, who's such a gifted writer, I must say. Because he's gone into Syria and talked about something that very few people have talked about, which is the other side, the Alawite side.

GREENE: The Alawites, a religious minority and Assad comes from that sect.

BROWN: Absolutely. They are the Bashar Assad supporters. And what he really discusses is how the rebels have been overly romanticized perhaps by the West. And he interviews some very, very interesting people in the piece who strongly feel that the Western media has become too captive to the rebels - the whole idea of the Arab Spring, the kind of righteousness of the street rising up against a brutally repressive regime, which it is.

But the mainstream media and the Western press have really failed to acknowledge very early on how radically violent and jihadist the rebels became at a very early point. And to demonstrate this, he interviews these two - this very interesting woman, Aliaa. He tells the story through the prism of her and her friend, who's a Sunni, who's on the other side and who is anti-Assad. These two girls were best of friends, but when this situation broke out, gradually they were forced apart by the war.

GREENE: Yeah, the friendship really broke down. It was sad.

BROWN: It really broke down. And you see, again, the use of media, because Aliaa is tracing her friend's increasing radicalism on Facebook. Her Facebook posts begin to change. She starts having Islamic slogans. She marries a man in Iraq who posts a photograph of a black al-Qaida banner. And you see these close people were actually estranged by what happens. And it's a very moving piece.

GREENE: You know, Tina, it's almost like you feel yourself sympathizing with both sides in this conflict, that maybe both sides are aggressors and victims here.

BROWN: It's true. As the main woman who he interviews says, you know, we used to live side by side but now they've been driven apart by Assad because recognizing that this was the way to create divisions and the way to create loyalty, he has exploited that. So, it's a kind of an Arab Spring that became a poisoned chalice for these people who just wanted social change and suddenly find themselves in a hideous, brutal ethnic strife.

GREENE: Well, Tina, you also brought us one book. And I'm just going to read the title of it, because it kind of says it all: "A Death in the Lucky Holiday Hotel: Murder, Money and an Epic Power Struggle in China." How about that?

BROWN: Yeah. I love this book. I mean, I was mesmerized by this fascinating case in China a couple of years back of the British man Neil Hayward, who was found dead in a hotel in China. And at first it was said that he had died from excess alcohol, but gradually it emerged that in fact he'd been poisoned, it was alleged, by the wife of the party chief, Bo Xilai.

GREENE: And a huge embarrassment to the Communist Party.

BROWN: A huge embarrassment. And what this book really does, again, the power of media in China now, you can't suppress this kind of information anymore. But in a country where the government operates in secrecy and the media serves as a mouthpiece, we now have Weibo, which is the Chinese Twitter, which is tearing down the walls that block the information flow across the country. So, Weibo was telling the Chinese people that this whole situation was very different from how it had been put out. That Bo Xilai was a despot, a corrupt guy; there was a power struggle going on in Beijing.

It's a fascinating story, which really gives you the atmosphere of a very scary modern China, where you can declare somebody corrupt, you can have them thrown into jail - they just disappear and they very often die in custody. So, this is the new stick to beat people with, is just declare them corrupt. So, none of these so-called reforms that we're hearing about are in any sense what they seem.

GREENE: And, you know, Tina, just listening to you talk about these three pieces, I'm left with this question: you think about China, you think about Turkey, you think about Syria - are we seeing the power of social media or are we seeing three countries that might be on the verge of really cracking down on the new power of social media?

BROWN: Well, that is, of course, the fascinating million-dollar question is how much China, for instance, can now crack down. I mean, the truth is it's going to be very hard indeed, I think, to put the genie back into the bottle in a place like China at this point because it's just so huge and just so populous. And, you know, technology has now grown very fast.

GREENE: Tina Brown, thanks, as always, for making these connections for us.

BROWN: Thank you.

GREENE: The feature we call Word of Mouth. Tina Brown is editor of the Daily Beast.


GREENE: This is NPR News.

Copyright © 2013 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.