SCOTT SIMON, HOST:
This week, a U.S. federal judge in Virginia struck down that state's ban on same-sex marriage. It is the latest in a string of similar rulings and it indicates that the strategy for winning marriage equality in federal courts may be moving faster than many had expected. NPR's Richard Gonzales reports.
RICHARD GONZALES, BYLINE: In a ruling, U.S. District Judge Arenda Wright Allen said Virginia's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional because core civil rights are at stake. And she compared the case to the landmark 1967 Supreme Court ruling recognizing interracial marriage. But the judge stayed her order pending appeal, which means same-sex couples in Virginia can't rush to the alter yet.
Still, Matthew McGill, one of the attorneys on the case, says the ruling is significant.
MATTHEW MCGILL: You have district courts across the country in places that are not seen as remotely liberal all recognizing that this is what our federal Constitution and its promise of equality requires.
GONZALES: The ruling follows another decision issued this week by a federal judge in Kentucky ordering officials there to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. One of the attorneys in the Kentucky case, Dawn Elliott, says her strategy was to chip away at the state's same-sex marriage ban.
DAWN ELLIOTT: The ultimate goal is for everybody in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, you know, who is a gay and lesbian couple to be able to marry. But we figured we'd start out small and then ultimately hit the ball right out of the park.
GONZALES: The ruling in Kentucky follows on the heals of other similar decisions by federal judges in Utah and Oklahoma. In Texas this week, a federal judge heard a challenge to the same-sex marriage ban in that state. Also, lawyers in Missouri and Alabama filed lawsuits on behalf of same-sex couples there. Evan Wolfson, president of Freedom to Marry, says there's a dynamic legal landscape with over 40 cases in 25 states.
EVAN WOLFSON: All making the case that discrimination against gay people and marriage is unconstitutional.
GONZALES: Wolfson says the decision supporting same-sex marriage even in red and purple states come out of the Supreme Court's ruling last year striking down the Defense of Marriage Act or DOMA.
WOLFSON: Which said that under our Constitution, there really is no legitimate reason for treating one group of committed couples differently from the other.
GONZALES: But opponents of same-sex marriage say the federal district courts are misreading the Supreme Court's DOMA ruling.
JOHN EASTMAN: Which relied heavily on the fact that traditionally states have been able to determine marriage policy.
GONZALES: John Eastman, a professor at the Chapman University Law School recalls that the Supreme Court said that the federal government was obligated to accept state laws on marriage.
EASTMAN: If you follow the logic that the federal government, including the federal courts, ought to be respecting the decisions of the states of Utah and Oklahoma and Virginia and Kentucky if they choose a different policy and continue to adhere to a different purpose for marriage.
GONZALES: Eastman says he's not surprised by the pace of the court rulings striking down same-sex marriage bans. After all, he says, there's a coordinated effort to take advantage of the dispute about what the DOMA decision really means. Still, the recent decisions also focused on equal protection as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
Ned Flaherty who tracks every lawsuit in the country for Marriage Equality U.S.A. says there's less coordination than meets the eye and that the legal momentum for same-sex marriage is taking on a life of its own.
NED FLAHERTY: Every day when a new suit is announced somewhere, it's news to everybody.
GONZALES: Flaherty says the news will keep coming as there are seven more federal rulings due in the coming months. Richard Gonzales, NPR News, San Francisco.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
SIMON: And you're listening to NPR News.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.